Vuelta a Espana st 1 ttt **spoilers**

specialgueststar
specialgueststar Posts: 3,418
edited August 2014 in Pro race
12. 6 km ttt on this parcours - flamin mental - thats 1.4 km per rider

stage1_profile.png

Gama-Garvey-Jerez.jpg
hedonist.jpg
untitled+folder+21.jpg
«13

Comments

  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,241
    Apparently the course features 19 roundabouts.
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • RichN95 wrote:
    Apparently the course features 19 roundabouts.
    that's 70 metres per rider between roundabouts?

    ~notGCSEmathsday
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,310
    RichN95 wrote:
    Apparently the course features 19 roundabouts.

    Circus stage. Shouldn't be allowed. Riders should have a union. No way to decide a GC.
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • monumento_michelin.jpg
    Rotonda.jpg
    Rotonda_casino_panoramica_jerez_01.jpg
  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,241
    RichN95 wrote:
    Apparently the course features 19 roundabouts.

    Circus stage. Shouldn't be allowed. Riders should have a union. No way to decide a GC.
    I said 19 roundabouts, not 19 hungry tigers.
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,310
    RichN95 wrote:
    RichN95 wrote:
    Apparently the course features 19 roundabouts.

    Circus stage. Shouldn't be allowed. Riders should have a union. No way to decide a GC.
    I said 19 roundabouts, not 19 hungry tigers.

    THAT WOULD BE FRICKIN AWESOME!!!!
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • milton50
    milton50 Posts: 3,856
    I'm guessing the route mainly goes straight over the roundabouts without much need to change direction? If there are a dozen 90 or 360 degree turns then, yes, it's a pretty rubbish route.

    I assume it's not forecast to rain in Jerez tomorrow?
  • kingstonian
    kingstonian Posts: 2,847
    Milton50 wrote:
    I'm guessing the route mainly goes straight over the roundabouts without much need to change direction? If there are a dozen 90 or 360 degree turns then, yes, it's a pretty rubbish route.

    I assume it's not forecast to rain in Jerez tomorrow?

    Would be kinda funny to watch if each one was a 90 degree turn.
  • gpreeves
    gpreeves Posts: 454
    Milton50 wrote:
    I'm guessing the route mainly goes straight over the roundabouts without much need to change direction? If there are a dozen 90 or 360 degree turns then, yes, it's a pretty rubbish route.

    I assume it's not forecast to rain in Jerez tomorrow?

    map-01.jpg

    That map suggests they have to make some sort of turn at half of the roundabouts. Thankfully the forecast predicts a dry day.
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,310
    Bvqa58RIgAMp2y2.jpg:large
    This has popped up on my twitter.

    The chap in the sunglasses? Betacur?
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • Dippydog2
    Dippydog2 Posts: 291
    Can I repeat my question please?

    What is this *spoilers* thing?

    How can you spoil something that hasn't happened?

    Yes, I know people record things to watch later, but surely anyone that looks at an Internet forum has the brain cells to realise that they might read about the past?
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,310
    Dippydog2 wrote:
    Can I repeat my question please?

    What is this *spoilers* thing?

    How can you spoil something that hasn't happened?

    Yes, I know people record things to watch later, but surely anyone that looks at an Internet forum has the brain cells to realise that they might read about the past?

    It is a courtesy to forum readers who may want to read other threads but avoid the race which is happening that day. The OP has added **spoilers** to the title in anticipation that other forum posters will add results etc. at a later date.
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • inseine
    inseine Posts: 5,788
    Local times.........

    19:04 MTN-Qhubeka
    19:08 Cofidis
    19:12 Europar
    19:16 Giant-Shimano
    19:20 AG2R
    19:24 Caja Rural
    19:28 IAM Cycling
    19:32 GreenEdge
    19:36 Cannondale
    19:40 FDJ
    19:44 Lampre-Merida
    19:48 BMC
    19:52 Trek
    19:56 Belkin
    20:00 Garmin
    20:04 Lotto-Belisol
    20:08 Astana
    20:12 Katusha
    20:16 Team Sky
    20:20 Omega Pharma Quick Step
    20:24 Tinkoff-Saxo
    20:28 Movistar
  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,241
    inseine wrote:
    Local times.........

    19:04 MTN-Qhubeka
    ....
    20:28 Movistar
    That's no good. It clashes with Doctor Who.
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • From CW re Horner True?
  • Dippydog2
    Dippydog2 Posts: 291
    Dippydog2 wrote:
    Can I repeat my question please?

    What is this *spoilers* thing?

    How can you spoil something that hasn't happened?

    Yes, I know people record things to watch later, but surely anyone that looks at an Internet forum has the brain cells to realise that they might read about the past?

    It is a courtesy to forum readers who may want to read other threads but avoid the race which is happening that day. The OP has added **spoilers** to the title in anticipation that other forum posters will add results etc. at a later date.

    Ok, it's a courtesy for those who do not have the brain cells to avoid articles about things they do not want to know!

    If the thread was titled "green socks" and the poster wanted to talk about green socks at the Vuelta I can understand that it would be courteous to call the thread "green socks, mag contain Vuelta spoilers", but if the title is just "Vuelta" isn't that sufficient hint?
  • inseine
    inseine Posts: 5,788
    Dippydog2 wrote:
    Dippydog2 wrote:
    Can I repeat my question please?

    What is this *spoilers* thing?

    How can you spoil something that hasn't happened?

    Yes, I know people record things to watch later, but surely anyone that looks at an Internet forum has the brain cells to realise that they might read about the past?

    It is a courtesy to forum readers who may want to read other threads but avoid the race which is happening that day. The OP has added **spoilers** to the title in anticipation that other forum posters will add results etc. at a later date.

    Ok, it's a courtesy for those who do not have the brain cells to avoid articles about things they do not want to know!

    If the thread was titled "green socks" and the poster wanted to talk about green socks at the Vuelta I can understand that it would be courteous to call the thread "green socks, mag contain Vuelta spoilers", but if the title is just "Vuelta" isn't that sufficient hint?

    Or just put 'spoiler' in the title. Does it really upset you so much? Can we just move on and talk about cycling?
  • danlikesbikes
    danlikesbikes Posts: 3,898
    Dippydog2 wrote:

    Ok, it's a courtesy for those who do not have the brain cells to avoid articles about things they do not want to know!

    If the thread was titled "green socks" and the poster wanted to talk about green socks at the Vuelta I can understand that it would be courteous to call the thread "green socks, mag contain Vuelta spoilers", but if the title is just "Vuelta" isn't that sufficient hint?

    Generally in BR land you tend to find a spoilers post where as the name suggests people post about the days events and often as it's happening for those who would like to read it on situ e.g. Those at work who want to know what's going on as it happens.

    I for one do have a few brain cells (but not many lol) and will avoid the spoilers post to watch the race later but am happy to go into other posts about stages coming up where generally the talk is not about what happened on the previous stage as that's covered in the spoilers post.

    So in answer to your question it's just simpler to have 2 threads one for the days events which may contain spoilers and one for future stages for speculation, rumours and banter of what may come.

    All quite civilised really and seems to work for the masses with or without brain cells
    Pain hurts much less if its topped off with beating your mates to top of a climb.
  • ocdupalais
    ocdupalais Posts: 4,314
    I'd been hunting around for for some chat on green socks and got excited to find this thread in my search - only to find it's someone whingeing about "spoilers"... Well, it certainly spoiled it for me.

    Can we put "Not Green Socks" on threads from now on, please?
  • above_the_cows
    above_the_cows Posts: 11,406
    stage1_profile.png

    Hey that's the profile of my ride today! Well a bit longer actually and may include the odd bridge so maybe not actually 'that' flat.
    Correlation is not causation.
  • above_the_cows
    above_the_cows Posts: 11,406
    RichN95 wrote:
    Apparently the course features 19 roundabouts.

    OK this is very like my ride today. It might also rain here.
    Correlation is not causation.
  • frenchfighter
    frenchfighter Posts: 30,642
    This is a GT so we should have a spoiler per stage. An overriding spoiler for a stage race should only be for the smaller ones. With the ridiculously good line up I am sure there will be a ton to talk about.

    Re green socks. The BR pro race community have that covered :wink:
    viewtopic.php?f=40002&t=12929935&hilit=green+socks
    Contador is the Greatest
  • frenchfighter
    frenchfighter Posts: 30,642
    Valverde says he will work for Nairo if needed but says he has a strong chance to finish high and is in good shape and form. May cause some issues later in the race if there are two leaders, one selfish.
    http://m.cyclingnews.com/news/valverde- ... f-a-leader
    Contador is the Greatest
  • inseine
    inseine Posts: 5,788
    RichN95 wrote:
    Apparently the course features 19 roundabouts.

    OK this is very like my ride today. It might also rain here.

    Plus they go round some more than once, so more like 22. There's going to be some skill involved in getting teams to slow from 60+, round the roundabout and up to speed again without losing too much time. OPQS time
  • joelsim
    joelsim Posts: 7,552
    Hope Bertie is on form. It will be good to see a Quintana Froome Contador shoot off!
  • Macaloon
    Macaloon Posts: 5,545
    Valverde says he will work for Nairo if needed but says he has a strong chance to finish high and is in good shape and form. May cause some issues later in the race if there are two leaders, one selfish.
    http://m.cyclingnews.com/news/valverde- ... f-a-leader

    Doubt Nairo will lose much sleep to the challenge from a guy convincingly trounced by Peraud and Pinot a few weeks ago. (I'll never forgive Movistar for fielding Valvader at the Tour over Naironman, despite the promise of a Vuelta Nairo/Froome/Contador showdown).

    Bte9tvFIEAAcus-.png:large
    ...a rare 100% loyal Pro Race poster. A poster boy for the community.
  • frenchfighter
    frenchfighter Posts: 30,642
    Good to see you back Maca. Nice avatar.
    Contador is the Greatest
  • alan_a
    alan_a Posts: 1,581
    inseine wrote:
    Local times.........

    19:04 MTN-Qhubeka
    19:08 Cofidis
    19:12 Europar
    19:16 Giant-Shimano
    19:20 AG2R
    19:24 Caja Rural
    19:28 IAM Cycling
    19:32 GreenEdge
    19:36 Cannondale
    19:40 FDJ
    19:44 Lampre-Merida
    19:48 BMC
    19:52 Trek
    19:56 Belkin
    20:00 Garmin
    20:04 Lotto-Belisol
    20:08 Astana
    20:12 Katusha
    20:16 Team Sky
    20:20 Omega Pharma Quick Step
    20:24 Tinkoff-Saxo
    20:28 Movistar

    Excellent scheduling, should finish just before Dr Who starts.
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 19,310
    RichN95 wrote:
    That's no good. It clashes with Doctor Who.
    Alan A wrote:
    Excellent scheduling, should finish just before Dr Who starts.


    Er....
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,241
    RichN95 wrote:
    That's no good. It clashes with Doctor Who.
    Alan A wrote:
    Excellent scheduling, should finish just before Dr Who starts.


    Er....
    Alan's right. I hadn't looked at the schedules. Assumed it was on at 7pm (UK time).
    Twitter: @RichN95