Team sky tweet
Comments
-
The matt black is classy. I like a matt finish but I'm not sure I'm liking the rear end. The seat post/seat stay/top tube amalgamation while it may be aero is not aesthetically pleasing.Correlation is not causation.0
-
frenchfighter wrote:I reckon it looks fine. If they kept it matt that would be good. Shame he is in the opposite gear combo he should to properly present the bike.
For once I find myself in complete agreement with FF.
Other than that... it's a bike, it looks like a bike, probably rides like most other bikes.0 -
r0bh wrote:it's a bike, it looks like a bike, probably rides like most other bikes.
I read that in the M&S advert voice.Correlation is not causation.0 -
Above The Cows wrote:The matt black is classy. I like a matt finish but I'm not sure I'm liking the rear end. The seat post/seat stay/top tube amalgamation while it may be aero is not aesthetically pleasing.Follow me on Twitter - http://twitter.com/scalesjason - All posts are strictly my personal view.0
-
Looks like a propel without the rear wheel cutout. Not sure about the curved TT but otherwise like it. Although stem looks oddly small compared to head tube.0
-
I wish bikes would go back to being graceful with narrow tubes, they're getting chunkier and chunkier. Time for a UCI width:depth ratio of 1:1 I reckon0
-
ddraver wrote:It reminds me of my MTB Hardtail quite a lot I must say...
Mine too, the head tube looks like it should be on a downhill bike though.0 -
Macaloon wrote:Pross wrote:I wish bikes would go back to being graceful with narrow tubes, they're getting chunkier and chunkier. Time for a UCI width:depth ratio of 1:1 I reckon
+1x1010, Tubes not Planks.
Luddites. We all like a nice looking bike, but let's not discard the time honoured design mantra of "form follows function". You lot are worse than the bloody UCI.... ;-)Warning No formatter is installed for the format0