Nodders, millions of em!
Comments
-
There's a new family moved into my street. I saw the Dad come on a proper BSO and he was pedalling with his HEELS!!! Seems like a nice bloke all the same so I decided to bite my lip rather than take the mick.0
-
Yep, called pretty accurately, looking at the new TFL cycleflow data:
http://data.london.gov.uk/datastore/pac ... ad-network
Up nearly 50% last month!If I know you, and I like you, you can borrow my bike box for £30 a week. PM for details.0 -
notsoblue wrote:I bet these guys don't have to wear Hi-Viz...
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/f ... ker-deaths
That's unfortunate url shortening0 -
Keyser__Soze wrote:BigMat wrote:Leave the nodders alone. I'm in hi viz today, so what? It shouldn't be compulsory but it isn't hurting anyone.
I'm in hi-vis today too (Gabba in yellow), but as the proportion of cyclists wearing hi-vis rises, it becomes expected of cyclists by car drivers, police, and worryingly the justice system, so much so that cyclists are seen as negligent if they aren't wearing hi-vis. Get hit wearing non-hi-vis and I'll bet someone will try to proportion blame to you. I have no issues with individuals wearing it, but I am worried that due to the ignorance of others there'll soon be legal precedent for a reduced payment or contributory negligence for not wearing it, compelling everyone to have to wear it.
Compulsion by convention, or something. The only time I've been almost run into by a car in the last year or so, I was wearing a high-vis yellow/scotchlite l/s top. Fortunately the driver (taxi) saw me at the the last second and swerved away. He stopped, apologised and said SMIDSY. I pointed out the profusion of yellow and he replied that he associates high-vis with stationary workmen, not fast moving cyclists, so I just didn't register as a risk. Perhaps cyclists need our own high-vis colour (normal = yellow, rail = orange, cyclist =pink?) :?:0