2014 Cube Fritzz Pro (27.5") Now collected with pics
AAddict
Posts: 77
I live in the Lake District and do lots of forest riding, I'm looking for a new AM bike and am considering these two. I ride 10-25 mile loops of varied single track, technical and forest fire roads, I regularly do the North Face trail and other similar red routes. I feel I have reached the limits of a my current XC hard tail on the rougher and steeper downward sections and am looking for something that will allow me to 'attack' and enjoy these trails a bit more.
http://www.cube.eu/en/bikes/fullsuspension/fritzz/fritzz-160-hpa-pro-275/
http://www.on-one.co.uk/i/q/CBTIELGX5/titus_el_guapo_sram_x5_mountain_bike
Any thoughts? There are a few of the german direct bikes that I like but part funding with a cycle to work voucher so they are out.
http://www.cube.eu/en/bikes/fullsuspension/fritzz/fritzz-160-hpa-pro-275/
http://www.on-one.co.uk/i/q/CBTIELGX5/titus_el_guapo_sram_x5_mountain_bike
Any thoughts? There are a few of the german direct bikes that I like but part funding with a cycle to work voucher so they are out.
0
Comments
-
Both are extremely over the top for the riding you describe. Something with 120-140mm suspension would probably be more suitable.
These bikes will kill you on the climbs.Transition Patrol - viewtopic.php?f=10017&t=130702350 -
Cube for me, I like shimano over SRAM group set. I have a carbon cube hardtail never had any issues in 2 years apart from a new press fit bottom bracketCube reaction gtc race 2011 26er, Canyon spectral al 8.0 2014, cube reaction gtc race 2015 29er
How much for that!!!!!0 -
RockmonkeySC wrote:Both are extremely over the top for the riding you describe. Something with 120-140mm suspension would probably be more suitable.
These bikes will kill you on the climbs.
Really? The Cube especially (based on the stereo), is known as a good climber and not heavy at 13.8Kg. I enjoy downhill sections, am not adverse to the odd jump and drop off and felt these bikes would work great as a 'do it all' bike?0 -
I used to live in the lakes and it still the place I do most of my off road riding, even though I live down south now (Preston). My rides sound a bit like yours with the odd pass thrown in (Walna, Garbun)in summer. I've ridden loads of bikes up there and my conclusion is don't go past 140mm - My 5.5 Meta was fine but the Reign I had was far too sluggish. More recently I went back to a hardtail (Whyte 905) and that is probably the best bike I know for that terrain - slack angles give you more confidence but still really light. Load of people I used to ride with like the Orange 5 though.
In fairness, I'm see myself as more an xc / trail rider than AM or anything hardcore. I still stick by the 140mm max observation though - for both hardtail & FS. That said geometry of the frame is probably more important than travel.'Happiness serves hardly any other purpose than to make unhappiness possible' Marcel Proust.0 -
passout wrote:I used to live in the lakes and it still the place I do most of my off road riding, even though I live down south now (Preston). My rides sound a bit like yours with the odd pass thrown in (Walna, Garbun)in summer. I've ridden loads of bikes up there and my conclusion is don't go past 140mm - My 5.5 Meta was fine but the Reign I had was far too sluggish. More recently I went back to a hardtail (Whyte 905) and that is probably the best bike I know for that terrain - slack angles give you more confidence but still really light. Load of people I used to ride with like the Orange 5 though.
In fairness, I'm see myself as more an xc / trail rider than AM or anything hardcore. I still stick by the 140mm max observation though - for both hardtail & FS. That said geometry of the frame is probably more important than travel.
Thanks for that input, I appreciate it. I agree that geometry would be more important than travel. I notice the Whyte 905 even has a slightly slacker head angle than the Fritzz, and is only 1.3KG lighter. I'm getting a bit lost now. I want something far removed from the 100mm XC geometry that I've been riding for the last 2 years, I've put slicks on this now and use for commuting and shortish road cycling. So for my MTB I'm craving something a bit more fun, a bit slacker and won't flinch when you slam into a rock garden at speed. But yes, I also need it to climb up the long hills both fire road and technical climbs.0 -
Funnily enough I've turned my old hardtail into a commuter - a Kinesis Versa with 100mm travel. I know what you mean. I am very happy with the Whyte off road though - only 20mm more travel but just feels much more capable on the tricky stuff. On paper the differences don't look great though.
I'm not anti FS - makes sense for the Lakes - go for it if you want to try it.'Happiness serves hardly any other purpose than to make unhappiness possible' Marcel Proust.0 -
passout wrote:Funnily enough I've turned my old hardtail into a commuter - a Kinesis Versa with 100mm travel. I know what you mean. I am very happy with the Whyte off road though - only 20mm more travel but just feels much more capable on the tricky stuff. On paper the differences don't look great though.
I'm not anti FS - makes sense for the Lakes - go for it if you want to try it.
I've riden the Fritzz around the carpark and it didn't feel like a wallowy lay-zee-boi or anything, but in the back of mind I worry that that first time I hit that big climb out of Grizedale visitor centre I'm gonna die a death be stuck with a bike that makes me get off and push. Though this review of the top spec Fritzz mentions it climbing well:
http://www.imbikemag.com/issue27/?page=970 -
one of the canyon spectrals would suit your needs better IMO as nothing youre doing sounds too hardcore0
-
I really think a 160mm bike is way over the top unless you are doing a lot of uplifted riding, those bikes are designed for tearing down mountains with just the odd short climb. I used to have a Giant Reign X and it was just hard work.
I now ride a 130/150mm travel Nukeproof Mega TR and there's very few trails where it feels oit of it's depth, the 67 degree head angle keeps it stable while the short travel keeps it light and fast. Its still up to doing 6' drops, road gaps and rock gardens.
Something of that style might be better suited to days in the lakes.Transition Patrol - viewtopic.php?f=10017&t=130702350 -
RockmonkeySC wrote:I really think a 160mm bike is way over the top unless you are doing a lot of uplifted riding, those bikes are designed for tearing down mountains with just the odd short climb. I used to have a Giant Reign X and it was just hard work.
I now ride a 130/150mm travel Nukeproof Mega TR and there's very few trails where it feels oit of it's depth, the 67 degree head angle keeps it stable while the short travel keeps it light and fast. Its still up to doing 6' drops, road gaps and rock gardens.
Something of that style might be better suited to days in the lakes.
Is the Mega TR that different a bike from the Fritzz? Angles, sizes and weight look pretty much the same, I really wonder if 10mm at one end and 30mm at the other automatically changes the bike drastically when the geometry is very similar.
I'm not being argumentative and really appreciate the input, it's all helping.0 -
The Mega TR is lighter, mine is 29lb and could easily drop a couple pounds. It also pedals a lot better than the Fritz.
I was very unimpressed with my mates Fritz, he obviously wasn't too impressed, he only kept it 6 months.Transition Patrol - viewtopic.php?f=10017&t=130702350 -
RockmonkeySC wrote:The Mega TR is lighter, mine is 29lb and could easily drop a couple pounds. It also pedals a lot better than the Fritz.
I was very unimpressed with my mates Fritz, he obviously wasn't too impressed, he only kept it 6 months.
Hmm, this years Fritzz is actually an aluminium version of the carbon Cube Stereo from last year, very different to the Fritzz of old.0 -
Still has very linear rear suspension, like nearly all German bikes.Transition Patrol - viewtopic.php?f=10017&t=130702350
-
Any more opinions anyone?0
-
The El Guapo is amazing value, but could be too much as noted above. I'd look for something with less travel and a bit more agile. Trance, or even an Anthem.0
-
Thanks, the Trance may be worth a look, but the Anthems too XC for what I want.0
-
This is worth consideration:
http://www.decathlon.co.uk/rockrider-92 ... ctFeatures
Reasoanbly light, excellent fork, good parts, highly regarded frame.0 -
Thanks for the advice guys, Cube Fritzz ordered this morning, should be here by the end of the week0
-
AAddict wrote:Thanks for the advice guys, Cube Fritzz ordered this morning, should be here by the end of the week
0 -
Nice bike, pretty distinctive colour scheme too, mind cubes always are a bit bright. Nice bike though, if its too heavy you can always updgrade wheels, go tubeless etc but you have a solid frame and fork to flatten those rock gardens with. I live in the lakes too, but gone from Orange 5 to cotic bfe, really need to get used to picking my lines again! whereabouts do you ride?coiler - http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/1463278/
single speed -http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/1370469/0 -
fizik wrote:Nice bike, pretty distinctive colour scheme too, mind cubes always are a bit bright. Nice bike though, if its too heavy you can always updgrade wheels, go tubeless etc but you have a solid frame and fork to flatten those rock gardens with. I live in the lakes too, but gone from Orange 5 to cotic bfe, really need to get used to picking my lines again! whereabouts do you ride?
Thanks, When I test rode it was lighter (13.8kg) than my Cube Hardtail (but that was a bottom end bike). In and around Grizedale/Coniston/Satterthwaite etc mainly.0 -
petriodet wrote:AAddict wrote:Thanks for the advice guys, Cube Fritzz ordered this morning, should be here by the end of the week
Thanks, so looking forward to it. Hoping to get back a little of the confidence I used to have 10-12 years ago on my Stinky.0 -
AAddict wrote:fizik wrote:Nice bike, pretty distinctive colour scheme too, mind cubes always are a bit bright. Nice bike though, if its too heavy you can always updgrade wheels, go tubeless etc but you have a solid frame and fork to flatten those rock gardens with. I live in the lakes too, but gone from Orange 5 to cotic bfe, really need to get used to picking my lines again! whereabouts do you ride?
Thanks, When I test rode it was lighter (13.8kg) than my Cube Hardtail (but that was a bottom end bike). In and around Grizedale/Coniston/Satterthwaite etc mainly.
Ah right should fly down the fox and the parkamoor descent down to high nibthwaite on this then! good riding out there, me and some shipyard colleagues frequent it fairly often. Get it from wheelbase by chance? saw one in there the other day the same.coiler - http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/1463278/
single speed -http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/1370469/0 -
fizik wrote:AAddict wrote:fizik wrote:Nice bike, pretty distinctive colour scheme too, mind cubes always are a bit bright. Nice bike though, if its too heavy you can always updgrade wheels, go tubeless etc but you have a solid frame and fork to flatten those rock gardens with. I live in the lakes too, but gone from Orange 5 to cotic bfe, really need to get used to picking my lines again! whereabouts do you ride?
Thanks, When I test rode it was lighter (13.8kg) than my Cube Hardtail (but that was a bottom end bike). In and around Grizedale/Coniston/Satterthwaite etc mainly.
Ah right should fly down the fox and the parkamoor descent down to high nibthwaite on this then! good riding out there, me and some shipyard colleagues frequent it fairly often. Get it from wheelbase by chance? saw one in there the other day the same.
I've ordered it from Gill Cycles at Ulverston.0 -
Yarp i ride a 160mm bike, never had an issue with it not pedaling up well or being sluggish and comes down anything with confidence. Geometry is the biggest thing.
so i think your choice is great0 -
Feeling happy after collecting earlier
0 -
Looks lovely.
How does it ride?0 -
Good looking machine!0