what a hunt!

2»

Comments

  • joelsim
    joelsim Posts: 7,552
    Urgh. What a stupid biatch
  • secretsam
    secretsam Posts: 5,120
    pinarello001 wrote:
    team47b wrote:
    pinarello001 wrote:
    *For reasons other than the acquisition of food.

    Oh, as long as it's for something essential cruelty/slaughter is OK then :wink:

    My dear pedantic yet concerned friend and one who normally notes such detail:

    There is an asterix next to 'slaughter' and it refers only to slaughter and not any other adjective in my statement.

    If you want me to go anal on you:

    An action which deliberately intends to hurt an animal for pleasure or sport, the acquisition of resources for vanity and perceived medical benefits whereas slaughter is an action not deliberately intended to cause suffering. :P

    If we're being "anal" (eww): "Asterix" was a fictional humorous character. "Asterisk" is a little star thingy next to a word, used to direct the reader to a footnote.
    It's just a hill. Get over it.
  • RonB
    RonB Posts: 3,984
    Would it be controversial to suggest that the BetFair bear is next on her "to do" list? :wink:
  • ballysmate
    ballysmate Posts: 15,930
    Ballysmate wrote:
    Just came across this atrocity being perpetrated in China, would you believe. I know we are all aware of the Chinese attitude to animals, but it still shocks when you are confronted by it.
    Don't look, Pinar. I really wish I hadn't.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... video.html


    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... bbits.html

    Hopefully consumer pressure may make a difference, although I doubt it will alter the mindset of the savage bastards that can cause so much suffering.

Categories