Gearing - is it time to change?

Having just competed in the Monsal Head hill climb today, I drove home contemplating my gearing. I currently have a 50/34 with a 12-30 cassette. Living in the Peak District, 90% of my rides are hilly, in fact I target 15-25% gradients as I enjoy riding hills. I would say I'm a decent climber, especially on longer climbs, it's not a discipline I shy away from, but I want to get stronger and quicker.
having that cassette means that psychologically (like today) I'll always make use of all the cogs available but as I look towards some quality winter training I wonder if I should now start pushing some bigger gears and going to something like 12-27?
I'm sure this is not an uncommon dilemma, would welcome some thoughts from people.
having that cassette means that psychologically (like today) I'll always make use of all the cogs available but as I look towards some quality winter training I wonder if I should now start pushing some bigger gears and going to something like 12-27?
I'm sure this is not an uncommon dilemma, would welcome some thoughts from people.
Trainer Road Blog: https://hitthesweetspot.home.blog/
Cycling blog: https://harderfasterlonger.wordpress.com/
Blog: https://supermurphtt2015.wordpress.com/
TCTP: https://supermurph.wordpress.com/
Cycling blog: https://harderfasterlonger.wordpress.com/
Blog: https://supermurphtt2015.wordpress.com/
TCTP: https://supermurph.wordpress.com/
0
Posts
If you enjoy hills then you're not riding hard enough!
^^This
Cycling blog: https://harderfasterlonger.wordpress.com/
Blog: https://supermurphtt2015.wordpress.com/
TCTP: https://supermurph.wordpress.com/
Great suggestions above. If you take a small scew driver you could always adjust it back if required.
Nothing more add.
That makes no sense to me.
If we assume that "the same intensity" equals the same power output then I don't understand how it is physically possible to climb faster on one gear than on another...
You'll be just mashing harder gear unnecessarily and getting tired more quickly on longer rides.
This ^^ totally.
It's purely psychological. Just make sure you're in the right gear for the slope. If you need to use the 30, then use it, doesn't mean you'll go any faster if you use a 27.
If you find that you're never really using the 30, THEN get a 27-11 (not 12 please!) cassette.
You'd be amazed how fast you can go if you spin the 34-30 like a mad b*star*d!!!
Cycling blog: https://harderfasterlonger.wordpress.com/
Blog: https://supermurphtt2015.wordpress.com/
TCTP: https://supermurph.wordpress.com/
I have that confidence, thanks for the input I'll consider some options.
Cycling blog: https://harderfasterlonger.wordpress.com/
Blog: https://supermurphtt2015.wordpress.com/
TCTP: https://supermurph.wordpress.com/
It's nothing to do with 'confidence' surely; if the gradient is steep (and it is as the OP has mentioned 15 to 25%), then 30 may well be the perfect gear at the perfect cadence. Thinking of going to the 27 'cos it's a harder gear', is quite likely to be counter-productive.
If your HR is at or near the max, and you know you're knocking out pretty much max power, what good is changing down going to do?
If you're trying to improve your strength, seated lower cadence climbs are a good way to do this, but watch out for knee pains.
Every other part of the ride you spin away at the pace you need to go for the length of ride you are doing, so why do you assume you are not doing that on a steep hill?
Come on! You call this a storm? Blow, you son of a censored ! Blow! It's time for a showdown! You and me! I'm right here! Come and get me!
Because on the flat you can soft pedal - even for a couple of seconds - to get some respite. On a hill you don't (often) get that - you've just got to go up it. I recognise the OPs problem - I went from a 39/52 with 26-12 on my first road bike to a 34/50 with 28-11 on the current one - I got up everything including (short) 25%ers on my first road bike - so why do I need such low gearing on the current one? I don't - it's just that the gear is there and I'll click down to it if I'm not concentrating on gearing. I'll change the setup at somepoint - just haven't decided what too (39/53 with the 28-11 cassette?)
It doesn't sound like you have that confidence, as you can't allow yourself to not use the 30t. In other words, if you had the confidence to use a lower gear, you'd be doing so already.
Burls Ti Tourer for Tarmac, Saracen aluminium full suss for trails
But thats my point, why is it OK to ease up on the flat, but on a hill everyone seems to want to get up it as fast as physically possible without making it easy at any point in any way.
Come on! You call this a storm? Blow, you son of a censored ! Blow! It's time for a showdown! You and me! I'm right here! Come and get me!
Its a trade off though surely?
If you go down to a 25 or 27t then you get closer ratios over the cassette which are nicer to ride over the rest of the route, and which is worth a bit of suffering on short stretches of 15%+ gradients.
Because you can ease up on the flat without dropping speed too much. As soon as you drop power input on a good hill you'll find yourself in grind mode.
Come on! You call this a storm? Blow, you son of a censored ! Blow! It's time for a showdown! You and me! I'm right here! Come and get me!
I don't think it is about getting up as fast as possible - rather as efficiently as possible. What always strikes me, as a reasonably decent climber, that however hard I am finding a climb, the folk I'm passing are finding it harder. Even if they are pushing out exactly the same wattage as I am, they are spending much longer doing it. Chances are, the quickest way up a climb for you (assuming you are sticking to a threshold and not trying to get a Strava KOM) is also the easiest even if you might not think it at the time.
Believe me - this is one of my issues - I want to just MTFU and go up the hill - I've even done it on occasion - but othertimes I just give up and click through the gears until I run out. I know it doesn't really matter, but on the occasions where the will power is lacking then setting the bike so it's impossible to wimp out might just make the difference.
If you're in the 30, and don't quite have the power/willpower to go to the 27, here's a tip;
Drop it 3 gears, to the 21 or 19, and stand up and pedal. You change your muscle groups and get some fresher fibres working for you. Cadence drops of course, but this is normal when 'en danseuse'. (French - literally 'like a dancer'). Your speed should be about the same, possibly a touch faster.
Then when the freshness wears off, sit down and go back up to the 24 or 27. You should now be able to hold the 27 for at least a while, before going back to the 30.
Et voila!
Touch of sarcasm there perhaps....?!
What I said may seem kind of basic stuff, but having passed 11 000 riders on this year's Etape, it's amazing how many don't climb comfortably.
I do stand on some longer climbs (sometimes) but usually when I'm at the end of my grinding ability - and often I don't change down before doing so - if I did it'd only be down a sprocket ...
I have no problem standing and climbing - did plenty of that on Saturday - quite fun overtaking everyone else on the (short) climbs - a new experience for me! but they weren't steep or long and I wasn't struggling up them.
One of the hills I want to improve on is avg 7% with plenty of bumps but it's 3/4 mile long - if I get time tonight I might just try your technique ...
On a hill like that I would normally climb it about half in, half out of the saddle.
If going for a KOM or maxxing out, possibly all out of saddle or 75% out.
You should really be spinning quite fast (cadence >80) whilst sitting, so that you HAVE to drop 2 or 3 gears when you stand up. Then cadence drops to 60 or so. This is how the economy bonus works for you - going from light force, high cardiovascular work (seated) to high force, lower CV work (standing).
(N.B. Not everyone gets on with out of saddle climbing - I think it helps to be light, but I'm convinced it's a useful skill to train)
I'll try and sum up the reason for my post again. First of all, I have total confidence going up climbs, I really do not fear them, my rides take me straight to them not around them. My thinking was that if I went to a 12-28 from a 12-30 my easiest gear would be harder than what I have now so if I can build my strength further then I'll eventually be spinning the same in a 28t as I was in the 30t thus going quicker? I'm going to focus on keeping out the 30t for now (which I actually do sometimes anyway when attempting to over gear myself sometimes), but I just felt that removing it all together would make sense.
Cycling blog: https://harderfasterlonger.wordpress.com/
Blog: https://supermurphtt2015.wordpress.com/
TCTP: https://supermurph.wordpress.com/
Did you count them all?
Bianchi Via Nirone 7 Ultegra
Brompton S Type
Carrera Vengeance Ultimate Ltd
Gary Fisher Aquila '98
Front half of a Viking Saratoga Tandem
If you want to build your strength, just practice going up in the 28 or 25. This may build strength, but will probably be sub-optimal in terms of climbing speed.
Once again, if you feel the need to use the 30, then there is a reason for that, and therefore it's place is justified.
Grinding up a hill in too high a gear is one of the worst ways to do it IMO, (unless it's for a specific type of strength training).
(I use 50/34 (compact) with 21-11 for 'normal' riding and 28-11 for Alps, etc).
Had a 607 start number but rode it with my mate who had a 12000 something number.
Finished with about 1000 in front, hence the 11000.