Friday Debate
Comments
-
Veronese68 wrote:daviesee wrote:Fair enough. I was just going for topical.
Playing along - custard creams.
I haven't put a winking smiley thing as I would hope it's obvious to all I'm only joking.None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.0 -
daviesee wrote:Veronese68 wrote:daviesee wrote:Fair enough. I was just going for topical.
Playing along - custard creams.
I haven't put a winking smiley thing as I would hope it's obvious to all I'm only joking.
Regarding to dunk or not it depends on the biscuit. Always dunk a ginger nut, good structural integrity even when moist.0 -
walkingbootweather wrote:More to the point to dunk or not to dunk?
If you dunk Custard Creams or Bourbons I will hunt you down and kill you.
(I may have got slightly emotional in that response....)Chunky Cyclists need your love too! :-)
2009 Specialized Tricross Sport
2011 Trek Madone 4.5
2012 Felt F65X
Proud CX Pervert and quiet roadie. 12 mile commuter0 -
Kieran_Burns wrote:walkingbootweather wrote:More to the point to dunk or not to dunk?
If you dunk Custard Creams or Bourbons I will hunt you down and kill you.
(I may have got slightly emotional in that response....)
No I meant Amanda Hutton
Nobody told me we had a communication problem0 -
walkingbootweather wrote:No I meant Amanda HuttonNone of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.0
-
Miliband played it smart with this mail stuff.
He is on the reasonable side of the argument (he has cross party support) and has taken the spotlight away from the tory conference.
Has also been an opportunity for him to show he can 'stand up' to people - he's often looked weak in the past.0 -
This is the problem with this forum; people complain about the oiks from BB being allowed in here and then, when presented with the simple question of Custard Creams or Bourbons, immediately start talking Tunnocks Wafers. Now who has the moral high ground? Eh?Faster than a tent.......0
-
My thread, my prerogative.
I never claimed any morals anyway.None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.0 -
Rolf F wrote:None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.0
-
daviesee wrote:Rolf F wrote:
That's not what we normally call you but seeing as we're in civilised company I'll leave it at that
Nice new avatar by the way daviesee"Arran, you are like the Tony Benn of smut. You have never diluted your depravity and always stand by your beliefs. You have my respect sir and your wife my pity"
seanoconn0 -
Kieran_Burns wrote:Veronese68 wrote:<snip>
I certainly don't know what the answer is. I'm certainly not a fan of the popular press. sensationalism and celebrity culture seems to be all they are interested in as that seems to be what sells. They don't seem to care about news, all rather sad.
I've been quoted several times in the past saying that there are very few journalists left; the press is made up of 'reporters' who simply regurgitate the Reuters / whatever feed.0