Friday Debate

2»

Comments

  • daviesee
    daviesee Posts: 6,386
    Veronese68 wrote:
    daviesee wrote:
    Fair enough. I was just going for topical.

    Playing along - custard creams.
    I knew you were a wrong un.

    I haven't put a winking smiley thing as I would hope it's obvious to all I'm only joking.
    Tunnocks Wafers to be honest but thats probably going to far.
    None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.
  • veronese68
    veronese68 Posts: 27,692
    daviesee wrote:
    Veronese68 wrote:
    daviesee wrote:
    Fair enough. I was just going for topical.

    Playing along - custard creams.
    I knew you were a wrong un.

    I haven't put a winking smiley thing as I would hope it's obvious to all I'm only joking.
    Tunnocks Wafers to be honest but thats probably going to far.
    I'll accept that though. A former colleague referred to them as cocaine he was so hooked on them.

    Regarding to dunk or not it depends on the biscuit. Always dunk a ginger nut, good structural integrity even when moist.
  • Kieran_Burns
    Kieran_Burns Posts: 9,757
    More to the point to dunk or not to dunk?

    If you dunk Custard Creams or Bourbons I will hunt you down and kill you.

    (I may have got slightly emotional in that response....)
    Chunky Cyclists need your love too! :-)
    2009 Specialized Tricross Sport
    2011 Trek Madone 4.5
    2012 Felt F65X
    Proud CX Pervert and quiet roadie. 12 mile commuter
  • More to the point to dunk or not to dunk?

    If you dunk Custard Creams or Bourbons I will hunt you down and kill you.

    (I may have got slightly emotional in that response....)

    No I meant Amanda Hutton

    Cucking_stool.png
    Nobody told me we had a communication problem
  • daviesee
    daviesee Posts: 6,386
    No I meant Amanda Hutton
    :lol: :P :lol:
    None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,625
    Miliband played it smart with this mail stuff.

    He is on the reasonable side of the argument (he has cross party support) and has taken the spotlight away from the tory conference.

    Has also been an opportunity for him to show he can 'stand up' to people - he's often looked weak in the past.
  • rolf_f
    rolf_f Posts: 16,015
    This is the problem with this forum; people complain about the oiks from BB being allowed in here and then, when presented with the simple question of Custard Creams or Bourbons, immediately start talking Tunnocks Wafers. Now who has the moral high ground? Eh?
    Faster than a tent.......
  • daviesee
    daviesee Posts: 6,386
    My thread, my prerogative.
    I never claimed any morals anyway. :wink:
    None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.
  • rolf_f
    rolf_f Posts: 16,015
    daviesee wrote:
    My thread, my prerogative.
    I never claimed any morals anyway. :wink:

    Your thread, my thread hijack! :lol:
    Faster than a tent.......
  • daviesee
    daviesee Posts: 6,386
    Rolf F wrote:
    daviesee wrote:
    My thread, my prerogative.
    I never claimed any morals anyway. :wink:

    Your thread, my thread hijack! :lol:
    Quite frankly my dear, that was the plan. :wink:
    None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.
  • rolf_f
    rolf_f Posts: 16,015
    daviesee wrote:
    Rolf F wrote:
    daviesee wrote:
    My thread, my prerogative.
    I never claimed any morals anyway. :wink:

    Your thread, my thread hijack! :lol:
    Quite frankly my dear, that was the plan. :wink:

    That's always been your problem - too cold and calculating!
    Faster than a tent.......
  • daviesee
    daviesee Posts: 6,386
    Rolf F wrote:
    daviesee wrote:
    Rolf F wrote:
    daviesee wrote:
    My thread, my prerogative.
    I never claimed any morals anyway. :wink:

    Your thread, my thread hijack! :lol:
    Quite frankly my dear, that was the plan. :wink:

    That's always been your problem - too cold and calculating!
    Ive been called many things but that is a new one. Thanks! :P
    None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.
  • arran77
    arran77 Posts: 9,260
    daviesee wrote:
    Rolf F wrote:
    daviesee wrote:
    Rolf F wrote:
    daviesee wrote:
    My thread, my prerogative.
    I never claimed any morals anyway. :wink:

    Your thread, my thread hijack! :lol:
    Quite frankly my dear, that was the plan. :wink:

    That's always been your problem - too cold and calculating!
    Ive been called many things but that is a new one. Thanks! :P

    That's not what we normally call you but seeing as we're in civilised company I'll leave it at that :lol:

    Nice new avatar by the way daviesee :wink:
    "Arran, you are like the Tony Benn of smut. You have never diluted your depravity and always stand by your beliefs. You have my respect sir and your wife my pity" :lol:

    seanoconn
  • daviesee
    daviesee Posts: 6,386
    arran77 wrote:
    Nice new avatar by the way daviesee :wink:
    Thought youd appreciate that.

    Touched that you noticed. :oops:

    :wink::lol: :P
    None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.
  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 16,683
    Veronese68 wrote:
    <snip>
    I certainly don't know what the answer is. I'm certainly not a fan of the popular press. sensationalism and celebrity culture seems to be all they are interested in as that seems to be what sells. They don't seem to care about news, all rather sad.


    I've been quoted several times in the past saying that there are very few journalists left; the press is made up of 'reporters' who simply regurgitate the Reuters / whatever feed.
    In my view, there aren't many journalists left. Most of the news we read is picked up from Reuters and regurgitated.