Crank arm Length

glasgowbhoy
glasgowbhoy Posts: 1,341
edited September 2013 in Training, fitness and health
I bought another chainset recently and forgot to ask the size on it. It turns out to be a 170.

On my racing bike I have 175's and on a TT bike 172.5's . To be honest I've not really noticed the difference but going from 175 to 170 on my race bike is it likely to be more noticable? I'm about 178cm and would say I'm longer in the legs than the torso. I have had comments when racing that I do look like I'm riding a bit 'over geared', so, would shorter cranks and poentially more spinning be a good thing?

Comments

  • Here is what the very wise Sheldon Brown has to say on the subject.
    http://sheldonbrown.com/cranks.html
  • Will fit them and see how I go then, cheers for the link
  • If you're overgeared why not (if you think it's important to you) just gear down.

    Crank length doesn't have any effect on performance. Just select the cranks that allow you to get in the best position.

    Ric
    Coach to Michael Freiberg - Track World Champion (Omnium) 2011
    Coach to James Hayden - Transcontinental Race winner 2017, and 2018
    Coach to Jeff Jones - 2011 BBAR winner and 12-hour record
    Check out our new website https://www.cyclecoach.com
  • The biggest problem is probably that you'll have to add 5mm of spacers under your stem and 5mm to the seat post to get the same leg extension at the bottom of your pedal stroke. Not necessarily a big problem but it can take some fiddling to get your head around the fit implications (depending on tube angles etc between frames).

    Now that I'm used to is I barely notice the move from 172.5 on the road bike to 165 on the track bike. I wouldn't worry about the crank length too much, you'll have a bit of time adapting but probably not long.
  • shorter lengths seem to work well for a TT bikes with what I have researched, longer cranks for road bikes, good for climbing and longer legs
  • mrwibble
    mrwibble Posts: 980
    edited September 2013
    and some one else will say the opposite, so personal preference. I read somewhere shorter crank length for TT helps open the hip angle which sounded logical.
  • Crank length doesn't have any effect on performance.

    Whilst I would tend to agree that whether you use 175mm cranks or 170mm cranks is if no real consequence, surely there must be a limit to this? Suppose I had a set of 100mm cranks made up, and a set of 200mm cranks, would there really be no effect on performance if I swapped between them?
    "an original thinker… the intellectual heir of Galileo and Einstein… suspicious of orthodoxy - any orthodoxy… He relishes all forms of ontological argument": jane90.
  • TT'ing requires an high cadence to set fast time so if you are used to fast spinning then a shorter crank means the circumference distance is shorter for the pedaling?
  • Grill
    Grill Posts: 5,610
    Shorter cranks on TT bikes. Besides that preference is key.
    English Cycles V3 | Cervelo P5 | Cervelo T4 | Trek Domane Koppenberg
  • @grill
    what's your Foil 20 like? What is the stiffness like, too much?
  • Grill
    Grill Posts: 5,610
    mrwibble wrote:
    @grill
    what's your Foil 20 like? What is the stiffness like, too much?

    Fantastic bike (I've had 2). Plenty comfy for me as it's now been relegated to my winter bike. Done loads of audaxes on it, including 400k and 600k.
    English Cycles V3 | Cervelo P5 | Cervelo T4 | Trek Domane Koppenberg