UCI Shocker! Pat Does The Right Thing
Richmond Racer
Posts: 8,561
and says the right things too
World Series of Cycling booted into the long grass
http://velonews.competitor.com/2013/02/ ... ved_274151
World Series of Cycling booted into the long grass
http://velonews.competitor.com/2013/02/ ... ved_274151
0
Comments
-
Now if he could just sort out the damned points system! Dunno about you guys but I don't actually think there is much wrong with the races themselves. This crusade to re-brand and re-formulate the racing seems odd to me - it's not just the UCI though (De Ronde being the prime example!).
By all means sort out the associated activities like funding for races, media coverage, rewards/points just not the races themselves.0 -
Hmm saw the tittle and expected the long awaited resignation.0
-
Something isn't right. Surely some splinter group from within the UCI should be releasing a press release about how much they disagree with the decision.
Otherwise, good job UCI.0 -
andi1363 wrote:Hmm saw the tittle and expected the long awaited resignation.
I know. Bit of a teaser to draw you all in...0 -
Has he resigned yet?Contador is the Greatest0
-
frenchfighter wrote:Has he resigned yet?
No it was just RR faking an orgasm (on the rest of BR's behalf!)0 -
andi1363 wrote:Hmm saw the tittle and expected the long awaited resignation.
Didnt see this before I posted. My thoughts exactly.Contador is the Greatest0 -
andi1363 wrote:Hmm saw the tittle and expected the long awaited resignation.
I was thinking ritual suicide.0 -
WTF would he resign? Because a bunch of people on the internetz think so?Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.0
-
The internetz makes revolutionz now don't-chu know.
Oh... right. Sorry. Another piece of raging Twitshit.0 -
I smell money.Warning No formatter is installed for the format0
-
Why cant people just say 'Internet'. 'internetz' is cringeworthy.
Pat should resign as he is incompetent and there needs to be fresh blood in a sport which is supposedly coming through to a new era. I'm sure a poll of those actively involved in the sport would lead to a sub 50%.Contador is the Greatest0 -
-
I feel truly sick now0
-
frenchfighter wrote:Why cant people just say 'Internet'. 'internetz' is cringeworthy.
Pat should resign as he is incompetent and there needs to be fresh blood in a sport which is supposedly coming through to a new era. I'm sure a poll of those actively involved in the sport would lead to a sub 50%.0 -
iainf72 wrote:
Wot Jai-lookat-Meeee sells
St Mellons Tesco: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/8484116.stmTwitter: @RichN950 -
iainf72 wrote:WTF would he resign? Because a bunch of people on the internetz think so?
No, because he is incompetent, hopeless and helpless. Possibly even complicit in helping to hide or turn a blind eye to doping, or assisting his predecessor in doing so.
I am a cyclist and a BC member and I believe the only way forward for cycling is to dump the UCI. They are only interested in so called "Globalising" of cycling, to attract more money, and care little how they do it.
Pro cycling should do what football did, when forming the Premiership, and split from the UCI. The sponsors would follow and the UCI would be left high and dry. An expensive, office based, self serving management is not necessary in cycling. The races have there own promotion companies and the teams generate there own cash. The amateur side of the sport is left to its own devices anyway so there would be no difference there.
Wasting money on a big office bound expense account management is wasteful and un-necessary.0 -
mike6 wrote:I am a cyclist and a BC member and I believe the only way forward for cycling is to dump the UCI. They are only interested in so called "Globalising" of cycling, to attract more money, and care little how they do it.
Pro cycling should do what football did, when forming the Premiership, and split from the UCI. The sponsors would follow and the UCI would be left high and dry. An expensive, office based, self serving management is not necessary in cycling. The races have there own promotion companies and the teams generate there own cash. The amateur side of the sport is left to its own devices anyway so there would be no difference there.Twitter: @RichN950 -
frenchfighter wrote:Why cant people just say 'Internet'. 'internetz' is cringeworthy.
Pat should resign as he is incompetent and there needs to be fresh blood in a sport which is supposedly coming through to a new era. I'm sure a poll of those actively involved in the sport would lead to a sub 50%.
I thought it was all the fresh blood in the sport that caused all the trouble in the first place or was it re-cycled blood? All this science confuses me!0 -
'twas mostly recycled, though does EPO count as new blood?
This quote was most telling: "The UCI wants to develop the WorldTour with new races, in new places, so to speak, in major commercial markets, and we want to work with people who can help us do that."
So more races in China operated by the UCI?0 -
Who'll know the answer? Oh I know
*paging Dr Ferrari...*0 -
frenchfighterz wrote:Why cant people just say 'Internet'. 'internetz' is cringeworthy.
It's kind of ironic condescension. 'Cringeworthy' is a desirable outcome. It's cringeworthy that a relatively small but loud mass of people on the internet think they can effect real world change by furiously mashing away at their keyboards. (Although, it's a lovely notion.)
That's my point at least.0 -
The thing about WSC was that it gave price's gifted group control over the teams - gifted would essentially sell their services back to the races and pocket the profit. Don't think pat liked the thought f anyone else making money out of the teams but him :
Should the calendar be streamlined, though I.e. sort out the obvious clashes like P-N? Personally would like to see far more integration of the women's sport along the lines of te recently announced Aussie model.0 -
EKIMIKE wrote:frenchfighterz wrote:Why cant people just say 'Internet'. 'internetz' is cringeworthy.
It's kind of ironic condescension. 'Cringeworthy' is a desirable outcome. It's cringeworthy that a relatively small but loud mass of people on the internet think they can effect real world change by furiously mashing away at their keyboards. (Although, it's a lovely notion.)
That's my point at least.
I suppose it is lost over the keyboards...
I hear often people having a go at people who have strong opinions on change - it is just an opinion. I suspect only a small minority think they have huge influence on the machinations of our sport with what they say on this forum. That being said, voicing an opinion on here or in blogs, twitter etc is not by any means useless.Contador is the Greatest0 -
micron wrote:The thing about WSC was that it gave price's gifted group control over the teams - gifted would essentially sell their services back to the races and pocket the profit. Don't think pat liked the thought f anyone else making money out of the teams but him :
Because Pat makes money off of races now?Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.0 -
frenchfighter wrote:That being said, voicing an opinion on here or in blogs, twitter etc is not by any means useless.
Absolutely not. It just requires a stepping out from behind the keyboard and into real world action to effect real world change- CCN is a prime example (whether successful or not).
The integration of women's cycling would be a definite positive and it's definitely possible for many races. My gripe would come if for example every race ended in a circuit, like they've done with Flanders and if every stage race had one on those silly little 'sprint off's' like we've seen a rarely but increasingly (leave it to the track boys). That's obviously not the case at the moment but you can see it happening if they smell money.
For me, If they really want to generate money (which is a legit aim) then the obvious step is to sort out the broadcasting, not change the contents of the racing. No harm in shuffling the calendar either, especially if it helps towards the broadcasting aims.0 -
RichN95 wrote:mike6 wrote:I am a cyclist and a BC member and I believe the only way forward for cycling is to dump the UCI. They are only interested in so called "Globalising" of cycling, to attract more money, and care little how they do it.
Pro cycling should do what football did, when forming the Premiership, and split from the UCI. The sponsors would follow and the UCI would be left high and dry. An expensive, office based, self serving management is not necessary in cycling. The races have there own promotion companies and the teams generate there own cash. The amateur side of the sport is left to its own devices anyway so there would be no difference there.
Exactly. Why waste tons of cash on a jobs for the boys UCI when it can be done properly within cycling and the money stays in the sport, to be used for the good of the sport.0 -
The UCI has a portfolio under its umbrella for governance etc:
Road (I assume you're just talking road as you specifiy pro cycling)
Track
MTB
Cyclo cross
BMX
Trials
Indoor cyling
Paracycling
So when you do away with all those overheads like an expensive building, staff - that kind of 'luxury' - that covers all these branches of cycling...What happens to all the rest?0 -
iainf I imagine you guys have looked into the murky funding of GCP?0