Small ring v big ring?????
nickyg1987
Posts: 18
I was told to stay out of the big ring at the front and spin away on the front while training and it would help burn fat instead of building strength in the big ring! Is there any truth in this???
0
Comments
-
Absolutely. Try it for an hour on a ride you know and see how you feel compared to riding with both. Try and keep spinning on the downs too for maximum heart rate elevation!0
-
Erm, you could spin in any ring you like providing the effort is relatively light.
All exercise burns calories. Hard effort burns more than light effort. light effort uses a higher proportion of fat as fuel(allegedly)
How old are you? Spinning is good for young legs. Its also good for long distances.
As with many things there is no right/wrong answer.
#clearasmudDeath or Glory- Just another Story0 -
nickyg1987 wrote:I was told to stay out of the big ring at the front and spin away on the front while training and it would help burn fat instead of building strength in the big ring! Is there any truth in this???
IOW, it's just folklore/mythology.0 -
Thanks for the replies!! I'm 26 on Monday coming!! Getting old I'd horrible lol0
-
mec287 wrote:Absolutely. Try it for an hour on a ride you know and see how you feel compared to riding with both. Try and keep spinning on the downs too for maximum heart rate elevation!0
-
nickyg1987 wrote:I was told to stay out of the big ring at the front and spin away on the front while training and it would help burn fat instead of building strength in the big ring! Is there any truth in this???
Nah spin the Big ring as hard as you can! Pissing about in a little gear isnt going to burn much fat, and its not going to make you any faster either!0 -
Cheers for the replies!! I'll switch to the big ring then!! Weight loss is easier said than done!!0
-
point your handlebars towards the heavens and sweat like you're in hell0
-
Alex_Simmons/RST wrote:nickyg1987 wrote:I was told to stay out of the big ring at the front and spin away on the front while training and it would help burn fat instead of building strength in the big ring! Is there any truth in this???
IOW, it's just folklore/mythology.
^^ like ^^
Low cadence - working the legs hard, heart rate will be slightly lower
High cadence - working the cardiovascular system harder, heart rate will be slightly higher
Middle cadence - both systems taking a fair proportion of the stress = optimal ?
A coach told me he reckons he tested hundreds of riders and hardly any had an optimum cadence of anywhere near 100 - more likely 90 ish or possibly even lower. I dunno how lance did it then, he must have had an awesome cardio vascular system lol
In my first 18 mths back to the sport I forced myself to train at high cadence. This was because I knew I would get back problems if I dived straight into my "optimum" cadence.
Since then..
I've been using slow pedalling in training for specific (core engagement related) reasons
And I've been using fast pedalling in training for specific (pedalling technique) and other (see above) reasons
But mostly I've been training at race cadence 85-95.
Hopefully my logic isn't too far off, but it might be !0 -
In cycling, people often improve but not for the reasons they attribute it to.0