Seemingly trivial things that annoy you
Comments
-
team47b wrote:A fire station is not, generally, where the fire is so it is not a train station but a railway station, for trains.
Do you mean a bus terminus?
No, I think he means a road terminus for buses :P"Arran, you are like the Tony Benn of smut. You have never diluted your depravity and always stand by your beliefs. You have my respect sir and your wife my pity"
seanoconn0 -
team47b wrote:A fire station is not, generally, where the fire is so it is not a train station but a railway station, for trains.
Do you mean a bus terminus?
A terminus is surely the end of the line, not necessarily always the case with a bus station.
Take your point with the fire station though.0 -
The twunt at work who asks if I've seen such and such a film, No says I but its on the list to watch this week/weekend/ASAP, only for him to tell me how it ends or a plot spoiler
Aaaaaaarrrrgh the prick does it all the effing time0 -
team47b wrote:A fire station is not, generally, where the fire is so it is not a train station but a railway station, for trains.
Do you mean a bus terminus?
Following your line of reasoning it should rightly be called a "Litter, tramps and pools of vomit station", as this is generally what is there. And as others have pointed out, it's only a terminus if the bus route finishes there.
The older I get, the better I was.0 -
People who leave their rear windscreen wiper on when it's not raining.0
-
People who drive around with their fog lights on when its clear or even daylight.“Give a man a fish and feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and feed him for a lifetime. Teach a man to cycle and he will realize fishing is stupid and boring”
Desmond Tutu0 -
Slowmart wrote:People who drive around with their fog lights on when its clear or even daylight.
That's not trivial. That's grounds for justifiable homocide.Chunky Cyclists need your love too! :-)
2009 Specialized Tricross Sport
2011 Trek Madone 4.5
2012 Felt F65X
Proud CX Pervert and quiet roadie. 12 mile commuter0 -
People who write "should of" or "could of" instead of "should have" (or the abbreviated version should've).0
-
People who don't spell check their postsmy isetta is a 300cc bike0
-
Homocide? That doesn't sound right.I'm left handed, if that matters.0
-
Homogenise sounds smart thoughmy isetta is a 300cc bike0
-
Acho que eu deveria ter tentado isso primeiro para ver por mim mesmo :oops:my isetta is a 300cc bike0
-
k-dog wrote:Homocide? That doesn't sound right.
:oops:Chunky Cyclists need your love too! :-)
2009 Specialized Tricross Sport
2011 Trek Madone 4.5
2012 Felt F65X
Proud CX Pervert and quiet roadie. 12 mile commuter0 -
0
-
The way news broadcasters and journalists insist on using the suffix -gate when referring to any political scandal, eg Plebgate. Though in that case there was an actual gate involved; so maybe it should have been called Gategate.0
-
The increasing habit of using some contentious statement as the actual headline in a news bulletin, declaimed in a serious, declarative way, as if the objective truth, e.g.
"The Royal Family are a bunch of alien lizards from outer space"
...
...
... "that's what David Icke is saying in an interview today"
but then the list of annoying habits of today's tabloid news programmes could probably fill a thread of its own.0 -
Also, while I'm in a suitably grumpy mood, why is this forum getting taken over by firearms enthusiasts who seem to delight in telling use whenever they've been out shooting? At least I assume that's what "just pulled the trigger" means?
All these internet clichés are making me as sick as a parrot, IMHO.0 -
-
k-dog wrote:^ this will be up your street then http://youtu.be/vB9JgxhXW5w
Lovely! My point exactly, perfectly made by Mitchell & Webb.
To go back to Plebgate (or Gategate), amidst all the fuss about who did or didn't say what, the real issue gets ignored: Why was the cyclist MP (can't remember his name) so insistent on having the main gates opened for him to cycle through when it must have been quicker and easier to use the smaller side gate, as the copper involved told him to? As far as I know, no-one ever asked him that. Could the reason be he's a self important little wazzock?0 -
oblongomaculatus wrote:The way news broadcasters and journalists insist on using the suffix -gate when referring to any political scandal, eg Plebgate. Though in that case there was an actual gate involved; so maybe it should have been called Gategate.
What annoys me is when broadcasters refer to things as the "So called" whatevergate. It's only "So called" because you dickhead lazy journalists called it so!0 -
Losing to the Netherlands at cricket
0 -
Alain Quay wrote:cricket0
-
-
Alain Quay wrote:Losing to the Netherlands at cricket
Nearly posted the same thing earlier. Stuard Broad will not make a good captain and Ashely Giles should not be allowed anywhere near the top job coaching the test team.0 -
oblongomaculatus wrote:The way news broadcasters and journalists insist on using the suffix -gate when referring to any political scandal, eg Plebgate. Though in that case there was an actual gate involved; so maybe it should have been called Gategate.
On that basis I'm looking forward to an MP getting nobbled for putting in a claim for turfing a lawn.- - - - - - - - - -
On Strava.{/url}0 -
Manager-speak. You know the sort of thing. Leverage. Paradigm shift. (anyone have a clue what those mean?) Team Leader. When I worked in an office I used to hate being asked to "action" something. I also used to make a point of correcting managers who referred to "leave" instead of holiday, pointing out that it was neither the army nor prison, even if it managed to combine the worst aspects of both. And I didn't much like "Human Resources", because, paradoxically, those in charge there didn't seem to be human (best guess: some sort of life force sucking space vampires). But that's another story... The one which wasn't around then, and which I now hate with a passion, is of course "going forward". What's wrong with "in future" or "from now on"?0
-
I want to see an advert on the TV. It will feature a group of young men sitting on a hillside watching a really fit woman mowing the grass. One of them will then roll a can of soft drink down the hill towards the woman, he will have to motion her to open the can, because of course, she's too thick to do this without prompting. She is also too dim to realise that when she does open the can, it will go all over her and the men think this is a great laugh. She then takes her top off so that the blokes can get a good look at her and carries on mowing the grass.
What? I can't have that? Oh, it's sexist, I see.
What about a famous celeb dressed up as king and he advertises an online bingo site. At the end of the ad he gropes the arses of his two female escorts who are half his age.
That's unacceptable too? well well.
The older I get, the better I was.0 -
oblongomaculatus wrote:Manager-speak. You know the sort of thing. Leverage. Paradigm shift. (anyone have a clue what those mean?)
Leverage is what you have when you have photos of your boss in a compromising position with his secretary. Paradigm shift is what he will do to try to get those photos from you.0 -
Residential parking. It is becoming almost impossible for me to park near my house. workers from neighbouring shops park on our street all day every day and local car mechanics leave their cars waiting for parts here as well. Council won't put any parking control/permit measures in place. think this problem is spreading around the country. Why would commuters etc pay to park when they can leave their car for free in residential areas.0