And also Alan Davies has apologised for his idiotic comments over Hillsborough on BBC breakfast. Got nothing to do with A) he's playing Lpool Empire on Sunday night and is terrified of backlash and he has sold hardly any tickets and is desperate for scousers to come see him.
A mystery even J Creek could solve.
The dissenter is every human being at those moments of his life when he resigns
momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.
Hmm, I'm no fan of his but the journo actually makes me feel sorry for him, that is not journalism, it's abuse! Both [email protected]
MacKenzie was a career opportunist using controversial material to forward his own profile - but you can't help thinking that's exactly whats happening here. :shock:
'
"Feel sorry" for Kelvin Mackenzie! Are you alright? You sure that you're not spending too much time in one of those coffee shops. The man is a total cnut and deserves to be hounded for the rest of his life.
The Channel 4 journo cannot for a moment be compared to Kelvin McKuntzie. He is a hypocritical, predatory, evil, lying basket who has made millions for himself and Murdoch through the red top culture which is - "A feedback loop into incipient vacancy".
He has preyed on the vulnerable, sensationalised and soddomised peoples often ordinary existences which in turn kept his boss in control of politicians and opinions to further his own ends without any sense of morality or dignity.
I would have the bast4rds balls in a vice until he squeaked like a Jenny.
The Channel 4 journo cannot for a moment be compared to Kelvin McKuntzie. He is a hypocritical, predatory, evil, lying basket who has made millions for himself and Murdoch through the red top culture which is - "A feedback loop into incipient vacancy".
He has preyed on the vulnerable, sensationalised and soddomised peoples often ordinary existences which in turn kept his boss in control of politicians and opinions to further his own ends without any sense of morality or dignity.
I would have the bast4rds balls in a vice until he squeaked like a Jenny.
The Channel 4 journo cannot for a moment be compared to Kelvin McKuntzie. He is a hypocritical, predatory, evil, lying basket who has made millions for himself and Murdoch through the red top culture which is - "A feedback loop into incipient vacancy".
He has preyed on the vulnerable, sensationalised and soddomised peoples often ordinary existences which in turn kept his boss in control of politicians and opinions to further his own ends without any sense of morality or dignity.
I would have the bast4rds balls in a vice until he squeaked like a Jenny.
So it's fine to be a censored , as long as your a censored to another censored ?
OK...
The c4 bloke has done exactly the same, What would you do if someone came on to your property and stopped you getting in your car whilst telling you not to assault him? I'm amazed KM didnt smack the censored ! Frankly this is even more intrusive than the guy who papped Kate's Norks! This is the problem, he's made the story all about him and not about KM or what he actually did! This is one of the things I dislike most about the GB press. Just because KM is as much a part of that as the c4 bloke, it does nt make the c4 bloke right.
We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
- @ddraver
So it's fine to be a censored , as long as your a censored to another censored ?
OK...
The c4 bloke has done exactly the same, What would you do if someone came on to your property and stopped you getting in your car whilst telling you not to assault him? I'm amazed KM didnt smack the censored ! Frankly this is even more intrusive than the guy who papped Kate's Norks! This is the problem, he's made the story all about him and not about KM or what he actually did! This is one of the things I dislike most about the GB press. Just because KM is as much a part of that as the c4 bloke, it does nt make the c4 bloke right.
MacKenzie is a scumbag. He is a censored . Simple as. He went against his senior editor and published disgusting stuff about 96 people who died. That isn't comparable with turning up at someone's doorstep and probing them.
So it's fine to be a censored , as long as your a censored to another censored ?
Is the C4 bloke deliberately being a censored to make the point about what a censored MacKensie is?
Possibly, but by being a censored to show us what a censored the censored is, he reduces the dickery of the censored by being a censored . The latter censored could have highlighted the dickery of the fomer censored by being less of a censored thereby letting the full dickness of the censored hang out
We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
- @ddraver
So it's fine to be a censored , as long as your a censored to another censored ?
Is the C4 bloke deliberately being a censored to make the point about what a censored MacKensie is?
Possibly, but by being a censored to show us what a censored the censored is, he reduces the dickery of the censored by being a censored . The latter censored could have highlighted the dickery of the fomer censored by being less of a censored thereby letting the full dickness of the censored hang out
I feel 'censored ' when referring to MacKensie is by far not a strong enough a description, more in the region of 'pudding gutted ar*e-wipe' or maybe a bit stronger, he and a few others that have been found out recently indicate just how low the newspaper industry had become. :twisted:
So it's fine to be a censored , as long as your a censored to another censored ?
Is the C4 bloke deliberately being a censored to make the point about what a censored MacKensie is?
Possibly, but by being a censored to show us what a censored the censored is, he reduces the dickery of the censored by being a censored . The latter censored could have highlighted the dickery of the fomer censored by being less of a censored thereby letting the full dickness of the censored hang out
I'm amazed KM didnt smack the censored ! Frankly this is even more intrusive than the guy who papped Kate's Norks!
KM eh? Sounds very pally, you seem so angry on his behalf. And preventing someone from driving off is more intrusive than secretly taking a picture of a person half naked? You sure about that?
Admit it ddraver, you secretly like the censored don't you.
He's a very clever man is Kelv - very much a man of the media. With the wapping dispute and the emergence of sky/bsb the newspapers were under threat and needed to keep their medium in the public eye. Hence the eye catching headlines - the 'gotchas' and the suchlike - it was Kelvin using the system to draw attention to himself to seem like he is an invaluable asster to those who pay his wages. Nowadays with the newspapers in in decline and his paymasters being the bbc/sky/who ever will have him - he's doing the same thing - making an apology on his own terms is a career move. A manipulative cold hearted man - he'll always have friends in high places though, given that he says what the tories can't express in public.
The dissenter is every human being at those moments of his life when he resigns
momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.
So it's fine to be a censored , as long as your a censored to another censored ?
Is the C4 bloke deliberately being a censored to make the point about what a censored MacKensie is?
Possibly, but by being a censored to show us what a censored the censored is, he reduces the dickery of the censored by being a censored . The latter censored could have highlighted the dickery of the fomer censored by being less of a censored thereby letting the full dickness of the censored hang out
I'm amazed KM didnt smack the censored ! Frankly this is even more intrusive than the guy who papped Kate's Norks!
KM eh? Sounds very pally, you seem so angry on his behalf. And preventing someone from driving off is more intrusive than secretly taking a picture of a person half naked? You sure about that?
Admit it ddraver, you secretly like the censored don't you.
Ha ha, I knew some one had to smash that full toss out of the park...
(honestly, I ve not heard of him before, I kind of merge alll tabloid editors into one horrendous super censored if you will, I use KM becasue I can't remember what he's called, after correcting Kevin Mcloud a few times I just gave up :oops: )
We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
- @ddraver
Perspective. It's in the public interest to put difficult questions to a former newspaper editor who published some frightful, offensive and inaccurate headlines (without being prosecuted, which would have been an appropriate response to the horrors published in the Sun in 1989). It's in the public interest - and quite right- to do as was shown in the video. It is certain there will be no opportunity to pose the necessary questions in any other way. Those above who question this are lacking judgement in a way that makes me wonder what sort of jobs they do.
Clastic sedimentology... you tell him dd (hope that's not too pally).
Now I had to look that up, but far from lacking judgement it would seem that you are perfectly qualified to comment on this. Which rock would be best for Mackenzie to crawl back under? I'm thinking large and very unstable myself. What do you think?
baldwin471
Posts: 366
Posts
Both [email protected]
- @ddraver
And also Alan Davies has apologised for his idiotic comments over Hillsborough on BBC breakfast. Got nothing to do with A) he's playing Lpool Empire on Sunday night and is terrified of backlash and
A mystery even J Creek could solve.
momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.
I'd say bad journalist, if it was anyone but MacKenzie. He's scum who's been making profit out of treating others much worse for many, many years.
Edit: Does Alan Davies ever sell out? Least funny man since Dave Gorman!
MacKenzie was a career opportunist using controversial material to forward his own profile - but you can't help thinking that's exactly whats happening here. :shock:
'
"Feel sorry" for Kelvin Mackenzie! Are you alright? You sure that you're not spending too much time in one of those coffee
- @ddraver
The Channel 4 journo cannot for a moment be compared to Kelvin McKuntzie. He is a hypocritical, predatory, evil, lying basket who has made millions for himself and Murdoch through the red top culture which is - "A feedback loop into incipient vacancy".
He has preyed on the vulnerable, sensationalised and soddomised peoples often ordinary existences which in turn kept his boss in control of politicians and opinions to further his own ends without any sense of morality or dignity.
I would have the bast4rds balls in a vice until he squeaked like a Jenny.
Well said
And again
OK...
The c4 bloke has done exactly the same, What would you do if someone came on to your property and stopped you getting in your car whilst telling you not to assault him? I'm amazed KM didnt smack the censored ! Frankly this is even more intrusive than the guy who papped Kate's Norks! This is the problem, he's made the story all about him and not about KM or what he actually did! This is one of the things I dislike most about the GB press. Just because KM is as much a part of that as the c4 bloke, it does nt make the c4 bloke right.
- @ddraver
MacKenzie is a scumbag. He is a censored . Simple as. He went against his senior editor and published disgusting stuff about 96 people who died. That isn't comparable with turning up at someone's doorstep and probing them.
- @ddraver
Sometimes, yes. Then they might learn not to be a censored in the future.
Is the C4 bloke deliberately being a censored to make the point about what a censored MacKensie is?
Possibly, but by being a censored to show us what a censored the censored is, he reduces the dickery of the censored by being a censored . The latter censored could have highlighted the dickery of the fomer censored by being less of a censored thereby letting the full dickness of the censored hang out
- @ddraver
I feel 'censored ' when referring to MacKensie is by far not a strong enough a description, more in the region of 'pudding gutted ar*e-wipe' or maybe a bit stronger, he and a few others that have been found out recently indicate just how low the newspaper industry had become. :twisted:
KM eh? Sounds very pally, you seem so angry on his behalf. And preventing someone from driving off is more intrusive than secretly taking a picture of a person half naked? You sure about that?
Admit it ddraver, you secretly like the censored don't you.
momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.
If it doesn't move and should, use the WD40.
If it shouldn't move and does, use the tape.
Ha ha, I knew some one had to smash that full toss out of the park...
(honestly, I ve not heard of him before, I kind of merge alll tabloid editors into one horrendous super censored if you will, I use KM becasue I can't remember what he's called, after correcting Kevin Mcloud a few times I just gave up :oops: )
- @ddraver
Or Mackenzies dickness doesn't negate the C4 journalists dickness.
Is reachable from here.
Believe in miracles
And cures and healing wells
Yourself? I assume a high priest or philosopher with a comment like that.
- @ddraver
Now I had to look that up, but far from lacking judgement it would seem that you are perfectly qualified to comment on this. Which rock would be best for Mackenzie to crawl back under? I'm thinking large and very unstable myself. What do you think?
- @ddraver