Johan Bruyneel subpoenaed

dave_1
dave_1 Posts: 9,512
edited May 2012 in Pro race
when arrived in the USA on route to Tour of Cali. Must relate to Landis, Hamilton?? Or LanceA?? Or?
«1

Comments

  • Beatmaker
    Beatmaker Posts: 1,092
    Source? Can't find anything on this story.
  • nic_77
    nic_77 Posts: 929
    @TheRaceRadio was tweeting about it this morning...
  • iainf72
    iainf72 Posts: 15,784
    Interesting one. Who wants to talk to him and about what?

    You add in the timing of the the Lance article and you get the feeling something big is going on. It's not the USADA as they don't have power to subpoena people
    Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.
  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,253
    nic_77 wrote:
    @TheRaceRadio was tweeting about it this morning...

    Are there any reliable sources? That one 'lost it' a long time ago.
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • Beatmaker
    Beatmaker Posts: 1,092
    iainf72 wrote:
    Interesting one. Who wants to talk to him and about what?

    You add in the timing of the the Lance article and you get the feeling something big is going on. It's not the USADA as they don't have power to subpoena people

    This exactly.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Nothing on Google news yet.
  • dave_1
    dave_1 Posts: 9,512
    I was willing to believe race radio this time as Landis is under federal investigation and a more general probe into doping in cycling in the USA might be ongoing???
  • Tusher
    Tusher Posts: 2,762
    Plenty of time before the Tour though.

    Which is when any major doping story HAS to break.
  • LeicesterLad
    LeicesterLad Posts: 3,908
    Not Pat McQuaid ‏ @UCI_Overlord
    getting ready for the Bruyneel story avalanche.... first one coming shortly.....

    Not Pat McQuaid ‏ @UCI_Overlord
    Too bad @rsnt and Maertens are ignoring phone calls. Stories are moving forward without their comments. Can't hide this one.
  • Tusher
    Tusher Posts: 2,762
    ears prick up
  • BikingBernie
    BikingBernie Posts: 2,163
    RichN95 wrote:
    nic_77 wrote:
    @TheRaceRadio was tweeting about it this morning...
    Are there any reliable sources? That one 'lost it' a long time ago.
    For someone who "'lost it' a long time ago" they often seem to be 'ahead of the curve' when it comes to the disclosure of information. :wink:
  • RichN95.
    RichN95. Posts: 27,253
    RichN95 wrote:
    nic_77 wrote:
    @TheRaceRadio was tweeting about it this morning...
    Are there any reliable sources? That one 'lost it' a long time ago.
    For someone who "'lost it' a long time ago" they often seem to be 'ahead of the curve' when it comes to the disclosure of information. :wink:

    He's only ahead of the curve in that he's 'revealed' things that turned out not to be true. His predictions have been largely wrong and he's never said anything of interest that wasn't said by someone else. He is, like you, an Armstrong obsessive, so I can see why you see you think he's some sort of prophet. People who tell us what we already think are always the wisest.

    There may well be something in this story, but let's wait until a proper journalist writes about it. Anonymous people on Twitter will never be reliable sources to even minded. To the fanatics they will always great sources though.
    Twitter: @RichN95
  • BikingBernie
    BikingBernie Posts: 2,163
    RichN95 wrote:
    He is, like you, an Armstrong obsessive, so I can see why you see you think he's some sort of prophet.
    A 'prophet'? Hardly! I just was amused by your haste to dismiss what was reported, which rather came across as wishful thinking, and the partial confirmations that have followed.
    RichN95 wrote:
    There may well be something in this story, but let's wait until a proper journalist writes about it. Anonymous people on Twitter will never be reliable sources to even minded. To the fanatics they will always great sources though.
    Conversely, the 'fanatical' disciples of Armstrong are always quick to dismiss any source of information that reveals the truth about their messiah. Unfortunately this also includes those with a large degree of credibility.

    By the way, I think that if you read this thread you will find that I made absolutely no claims about the veracity of the rumour. However, plenty of others including Dave_1, nic77, Iain and LeicesterLad all commented on it in an uncritical way or have repeated what other 'Anonymous people on Twitter' have said. Following your 'logic' does not this mean that they are all greater 'fanatics' and 'Armstrong obesessives' than - in your opinion - I am?

    Perhaps the reality is that you would like to believe that anyone who does not buy into the 'Armstrong myth' has 'lost it'. As they say, 'Faith is believing what you know isn't true'. :lol:
  • Yellow Peril
    Yellow Peril Posts: 4,466
    :D
    RichN95 wrote:
    He is, like you, an Armstrong obsessive, so I can see why you see you think he's some sort of prophet.
    A 'prophet'? Hardly! I just was amused by your haste to dismiss what was reported, which rather came across as wishful thinking, and the partial confirmations that have followed.
    RichN95 wrote:
    There may well be something in this story, but let's wait until a proper journalist writes about it. Anonymous people on Twitter will never be reliable sources to even minded. To the fanatics they will always great sources though.
    Conversely, the 'fanatical' disciples of Armstrong are always quick to dismiss any source of information that reveals the truth about their messiah. Unfortunately this also includes those with a large degree of credibility.

    By the way, I think that if you read this thread you will find that I made absolutely no claims about the veracity of the rumour. However, plenty of others including Dave_1, nic77, Iain and LeicesterLad all commented on it in an uncritical way or have repeated what other 'Anonymous people on Twitter' have said. Following your 'logic' does not this mean that they are all greater 'fanatics' and 'Armstrong obesessives' than - in your opinion - I am?

    Perhaps the reality is that you would like to believe that anyone who does not buy into the 'Armstrong myth' has 'lost it'. As they say, 'Faith is believing what you know isn't true'. :lol:

    Bernie, you're going to have to pace yourself. You are currently full gas on two threads and I believe the absence of Armstrong threads recently means that you might not be "Forum fit". Like Schleck in the Giro you might need to measure your efforts and post yourself back to fitness. These threads could turn out to be grand Tours and not chippers. :D
    @JaunePeril

    Winner of the Bike Radar Pro Race Wiggins Hour Prediction Competition
  • blazing_saddles
    blazing_saddles Posts: 22,725
    Well, there might actually be something to this rumour, just as long as Race Radio isn't Velonation's source!
    "Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.
  • BikingBernie
    BikingBernie Posts: 2,163
    Bernie, you're going to have to pace yourself. You are currently full gas on two threads and I believe the absence of Armstrong threads recently means that you might not be "Forum fit". Like Schleck in the Giro you might need to measure your efforts and post yourself back to fitness. These threads could turn out to be grand Tours and not chippers. :D
    :lol:
  • takethehighroad
    takethehighroad Posts: 6,821
    Tusher wrote:
    Plenty of time before the Tour though.

    Which is when any major doping story HAS to break.

    Tour of California starts today, which is when one major story has broken each year for the last three
  • BikingBernie
    BikingBernie Posts: 2,163
    Well, there might actually be something to this rumour, just as long as Race Radio isn't Velonation's source!
    That is just what I thought!

    That said, some other details that could be confirmed (or otherwise) are surfacing. For example, 'The one who has lost it' has said that Bruyneel was not at the Tour of California press conference, which would be odd if true.

    Also, VeloNews, who are clearly trying to chase this story up, have reported that:
    RadioShack manger Johan Bruyneel is at Hilton Sonoma but not speaking w/ press. Team media director Philip Maertens would not comment.
  • iainf72
    iainf72 Posts: 15,784
    I would probably say the Velonation source is RaceRadio. Shane and RR chat a lot on twitter.
    Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.
  • BikingBernie
    BikingBernie Posts: 2,163
    iainf72 wrote:
    I would probably say the Velonation source is RaceRadio. Shane and RR chat a lot on twitter.
    Could be, but are not others, such as VeloNews, now corroborating what has been said?
  • dennisn
    dennisn Posts: 10,601
    :D
    RichN95 wrote:
    He is, like you, an Armstrong obsessive, so I can see why you see you think he's some sort of prophet.
    A 'prophet'? Hardly! I just was amused by your haste to dismiss what was reported, which rather came across as wishful thinking, and the partial confirmations that have followed.
    RichN95 wrote:
    There may well be something in this story, but let's wait until a proper journalist writes about it. Anonymous people on Twitter will never be reliable sources to even minded. To the fanatics they will always great sources though.
    Conversely, the 'fanatical' disciples of Armstrong are always quick to dismiss any source of information that reveals the truth about their messiah. Unfortunately this also includes those with a large degree of credibility.

    By the way, I think that if you read this thread you will find that I made absolutely no claims about the veracity of the rumour. However, plenty of others including Dave_1, nic77, Iain and LeicesterLad all commented on it in an uncritical way or have repeated what other 'Anonymous people on Twitter' have said. Following your 'logic' does not this mean that they are all greater 'fanatics' and 'Armstrong obesessives' than - in your opinion - I am?

    Perhaps the reality is that you would like to believe that anyone who does not buy into the 'Armstrong myth' has 'lost it'. As they say, 'Faith is believing what you know isn't true'. :lol:

    Bernie, you're going to have to pace yourself. You are currently full gas on two threads and I believe the absence of Armstrong threads recently means that you might not be "Forum fit". Like Schleck in the Giro you might need to measure your efforts and post yourself back to fitness. These threads could turn out to be grand Tours and not chippers. :D

    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
    Now THAT made my day. "Forum fit" - too funny
  • Tusher
    Tusher Posts: 2,762
    Hiya Dennis! :)
    Good to have you back. Here's a large mug of tea with some home made chocolate chip cookies. With extra chocolate.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    This might still be a chipper. Can't see anyone other than race radio being cited.

    Velonation is using race radio, and the only other site I can find is referencing velonation.

    Why would you want to go to the states if you live in Fulham anyway ;)?
  • calvjones
    calvjones Posts: 3,850
    Tusher wrote:
    Hiya Dennis! :)
    Good to have you back. Here's a large mug of tea with some home made chocolate chip cookies. With extra chocolate.

    As I yawned my way to bed last night I thought 'I wonder if that Bruyneel thread will see Dennis and/or Moray pop up.

    [Muad'dib]

    Oh for an unpredictable life

    [/Muad'dib]
    ___________________

    Strava is not Zen.
  • Tusher
    Tusher Posts: 2,762
    Victoria sponge, Mr Jones?

    I've a pot of stovies on for Moray when he gets in.
  • dennisn
    dennisn Posts: 10,601
    Tusher wrote:
    Hiya Dennis! :)
    Good to have you back. Here's a large mug of tea with some home made chocolate chip cookies. With extra chocolate.

    Thanx. I've been away on another forum. Most likely getting banned or already banned. It was a Tai Chi forum and if you can believe it they didn't like my ideas either.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    dennisn wrote:
    Tusher wrote:
    Hiya Dennis! :)
    Good to have you back. Here's a large mug of tea with some home made chocolate chip cookies. With extra chocolate.

    Thanx. I've been away on another forum. Most likely getting banned or already banned. It was a Tai Chi forum and if you can believe it they didn't like my ideas either.

    No. Way.

    Well, behave, and no bannage will occur :).

    Pro race is pretty civilised now. To be honest, I think it's going through a bit of a purple patch, though that just might be because I'm in on most of the jokes.
  • BikingBernie
    BikingBernie Posts: 2,163
    This is from Laura Weislo, ‏the US editor of Cyclingnews.com:
    Reporter to Bruyneel: is it true you were served a subpoena? JB eyeing suspiciously race badge: who the ** are you?
    http://twitter.com/#!/Laura_Weislo
  • jerry3571
    jerry3571 Posts: 1,532
    I know it's old news but I posted on here about how the Disco and USPS chaps seemed to win at will and not get caught for doping. As soon as a good rider left the LA/ Bruyneel Umbrella they got busted. So many riders got caught after leaving this Team it seems amazing. Even up to AC leaving Astana, I said AC would get caught for doping and "Ta Da" it happened. If it wasn't so obvious then they could hide all this (I think I heard about doping control and coded text messages to certain Team members). This all seems to sniff like UK Prime Ministers and certain Media Barons. There's a mass grave of skeletons in a very big closet somewhere and I will wonder if it will ever see the light of day. Time will tell.

    -Jerry

    PS-In case I'm a troll then this above is all mumbo jumbo; wild, crazy ranting and is based on fiction. Sorry Lance; don't sew me please! :wink:
    “Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving”- Albert Einstein

    "You can't ride the Tour de France on mineral water."
    -Jacques Anquetil