training for first 100

DonutDad
DonutDad Posts: 104
I'm certain this will have been covered before, but I can't quite find it.

Is there a guide for an average person, of average fitness, taking up the challenge of a 100 mile sportive for the first time? My aim is to complete the ride, have a nice day out and not worry about racing/times.

Everything i've seen includes 'speed work', high intensity training etc., with the aim of being faster/stronger/Olympic, whereas I just need to know I won't be a liability on the day and possibly even enjoy it.

I'm an ordinary bloke, who has set this personal challenge. I have a turbo trainer for when I can't get out, a new road bike and I'm raring to go - just going out and riding seems a little aimless, but is that basically it ? increasing the distance as I go?

Obviously I'm primarily interested in building endurance - have an HRM also, so would like specific turbo/HRM workouts maybe (best HR to build general fitness/stamina), but the whole aim is to get round this ride on the day (June 30th).

Beyond that, I'm enjoying getting into cycling again, and maybe next year, with a fitness base firmly established, I'll look to improve times and take on more challenges etc., but I need to know I'm doing the right prep for this first one.

Any pointers gratefully received, and again, apologies if this is covered somewhere. Any links ?

Comments

  • jgsi
    jgsi Posts: 5,062
    To be fair on yourself, it is a matter of getting used to the miles on the bike, on the road.
    Don't go out to be aimless. Every 20/30/40 /50 mile ride is getting you to that place you want to be.
    I would suggest that by May, you ought to be in a position to ride 80 miles , either in 1 hit or split into 2 x 40 milers in 1 day.
    Well , thats my take on it for you.
  • DonutDad
    DonutDad Posts: 104
    Cheers JGSI,
    seems a reasonable enough assumption, but knowing I'm doing the right thing is confidence boosting in itself.
    There is lots of baffling talk of thresholds and intensities, and I can totally see the point of it all in fine tuning the athlete, but first we need to get off the couch and create the athlete.
    I always push on rather than coast on rides, so I guess as my capacity to do so improves, so will my relative times/distances and ability. I also vary the terrain, my 100 miler is a hilly route, so I look for them on every other ride at the moment.

    If that's all there is to it, then that's probably all I need to know.
    It may be useful for others to see written so simply to, who are in the same situation.
  • sub55
    sub55 Posts: 1,025
    DonutDad wrote:
    Cheers JGSI,
    seems a reasonable enough assumption, but knowing I'm doing the right thing is confidence boosting in itself.
    There is lots of baffling talk of thresholds and intensities, and I can totally see the point of it all in fine tuning the athlete, but first we need to get off the couch and create the athlete.
    I always push on rather than coast on rides, so I guess as my capacity to do so improves, so will my relative times/distances and ability. I also vary the terrain, my 100 miler is a hilly route, so I look for them on every other ride at the moment.

    If that's all there is to it, then that's probably all I need to know.
    It may be useful for others to see written so simply to, who are in the same situation.

    that is so true
    constantly reavalueating the situation and altering the perceived parameters accordingly