Should all Racist, Homophobic or opinionated people.....

2»

Comments

  • tim_wand
    tim_wand Posts: 2,552
    edited January 2012
    A very wise and dignified man once said " Judge a man only by the content of his character"

    There are a few showing their true character on here at the moment.
  • Tom Dean
    Tom Dean Posts: 1,723
    Anyone who disagrees with me is gay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • MattC59
    MattC59 Posts: 5,408
    aaahhh........... this thread is making me laugh :lol:
    Science adjusts it’s beliefs based on what’s observed.
    Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved
  • tim_wand
    tim_wand Posts: 2,552
    Go on Matt dare ya. go and find a suitable Homo Erotic image for us all to get off on. You know you wanna.

    Its the only reason we're here.
  • MattC59
    MattC59 Posts: 5,408
    edited January 2012
    not entirely sure whether this fits the bill ?

    gay31.jpg
    Science adjusts it’s beliefs based on what’s observed.
    Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved
  • tim_wand
    tim_wand Posts: 2,552
    Arise Sir Matt C59 once again stirling public service sir!!! God love ya I dont know where you find them.

    I dont want to quote Big Hairy Wallpapers, But can we just all now chill out.
  • Class.
    That's made me smile.
    Thats Tevez earning his money!!
  • cornerblock
    cornerblock Posts: 3,228
    Now I can see why someone might refuse to shake hands with Tevez.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 20,305
    Jez mon wrote:
    Having said that, generally, once you invoke the colour of someone's skin, or someone's sexual orientation in all probability, you should shut up.
    ...unless you study or work in a Michigan school, in which case you've now got a law thanks to Republicans that specifically allows bullying if it's for religious reasons. I assume that if they aren't going to protect children in school from bullying, they are unlikely to protect adults in a football stadium either.
  • Yossie
    Yossie Posts: 2,600
    I think, essentially, what our learned friend BHW is trying to say is that he sees no problem with heading out on a Saturday, going to a public place full of other men, women and children he doesn't know, shouting vile racist, anti Semitic and criminal abuse at people he doesn't know, then getting aggressive with anyone who doesn't agree with his form of "entertainment".

    This aggressiveness also seems to manifest itself on forums where anyone who doesn't agree with him is classed as a "bender" - so lets bring sexual orientation into his portfolio of hate as well.

    I also like the way he has invoked the stereotypical far right wing apologist argument of anyone who doesn't think that shouting vile abuse at people is unpatriotic - unfortunately he also failed to see that we don't live on a ship so its not the "union jack" (his errandum) and rather the Union Flag whilst we are on land. If he does live on a boat then I apologise for my errandum.

    I was also wondering whether he feels that his patriotic duty of supporting our troops whilst they do their jobs only relates to white troops, or is he happy to support troops who aren't white? I suppose there may be one or two kicking around. Or is it ok to shout vile abuse at them in a football ground but outside he is wearing his Union Flag lycra and cheering with the rest of his mates?

    Before BHW doubts my backing of our troops, perhaps he should check my past posts about what I do. Mrs Y of posts passim will also confirm my sexual orientation, so I can't be classed as a "bender" either (well, to the best of my knowledge).

    BHW: it's a free world. We all have the right to have personal beliefs, no matter how wrong/vile they seem to others, however I believe that your racist/homophobic comments here are slightly out of place on a fairly well balanced cycling forum and you seem to be in a group of 1 that supports them. May be best if you head off to BNP.co.uk - its over there on the right. I understand that they do cleated bovver boots in case you need them.

    Mods: any chance that this thread can be closed down? Its all a bit, well, repugnant if you ask me.
  • bianchimoon
    bianchimoon Posts: 3,942
    +1 well composed Yossie
    All lies and jest..still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest....
  • MattC59
    MattC59 Posts: 5,408
    Chapeaux Yossie !
    Science adjusts it’s beliefs based on what’s observed.
    Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved
  • ddraver
    ddraver Posts: 26,695
    Wow, Yossie's gone all serious on us guys!!!!
    We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
    - @ddraver
  • DonDaddyD
    DonDaddyD Posts: 12,689
    CiB wrote:
    Oh. My clumsy stab at pointing out that football is entirely based on tribalism seems to have left me open to accusations of being a racist tw@t. It wasn't meant to and I'm not. If you've gleaned that impression from it, apologies from me.

    Not an apology actually, but an unreserved withdrawal of my comments and a full and unreserved apology for my clumsy stab at wondering where banter becomes hate-crime.

    I'll be off now.

    In all honesty I think your clumsiness exemplifies the grey area between "You fat bastard" (sung to Lampard), "You gay c*nt" (shouted at Grame Le Saux). Or my personal favourite "Adebayor your mum's a whore".

    The grey area not being when is it jest and when is it hurtful. But simply some people being offended and other not so much.

    Racial abuse against my ethnicity offends me obviously. But then I don't perceive homophobic chants or chants about gingers, Scottish etc as being equally offensive (even though to others it is). - See clumsy grey area.
    Food Chain number = 4

    A true scalp is not only overtaking someone but leaving them stopped at a set of lights. As you, who have clearly beaten the lights, pummels nothing but the open air ahead. ~ 'DondaddyD'. Player of the Unspoken Game
  • tim wand wrote:
    Obviously having not aquitted themselves well in the Anton Ferdinand / John Terry debate earlier on this forum the O/P is now trying to distort the issue.

    Surely the question should be Is it acceptable for Racist , Homophobic views to be publicly voiced at football matches.

    Answer No its a Hate Crime.

    I wont class opiniated people in this group , it is possible to have opinions without seeking to offend or intimidate anyone else with them.

    Its not illegal to hold opinions of a Homophobic or Racist nature ( fortunatley we havent got thought police yet)

    But the vocalisation and propergation of these thoughts in a Public environment in order to harrass or intimidate others is quite rightly a crime.

    Say all you want about a Nambie Pambie , Politically correct . world gone mad , Footballs a mans game, environment , but there is rightly no public place for the airing of these views, and thats for good reason.

    Yes you are entitled to your thoughts, but others are equally at right not to feel intimidated or harrassed by your public expression of them.

    In a previous thread, the OP stated that they and a great deal of other people didnt care if John Terry was racist.

    Well fortunatley I do and so do a great deal of right thinking people too.


    Suppression of opinionated people. Congratulations you've just closed the Internet.
  • Yossie
    Yossie Posts: 2,600
    Suppression of opinionated people. Congratulations you've just closed the Internet.

    Huzzah! Huzzah! At last! Now we can all get back to digging out 2nd hand (literally) spank mags from lay by dust bins instead of having to remember to delete our search history on our computers at home and not realising that you now have to clear Google search box history separately until its too late ......

    Oh, but to return to the halcyonic days of glosssy paper and bashing one out in the bathroom before dinner time .....