Drove a BMW for the first time today.

2»

Comments

  • bails87
    bails87 Posts: 12,998
    Mich wrote:
    6series 4.5 V8 on the drive, it's an absolute winner!

    In Bedworth?!

    Christ, you've just doubled the value of the entire town!
    MTB/CX

    "As I said last time, it won't happen again."
  • freeagent wrote:
    looks like it'll be a sensible Passat estate next time... :(
    Ooh, I'd urge you to reconsider.
    I borrow my father's Passat when my car is being serviced, and it's a thoroughly loathsome thing. Handles like a battleship floating on blancmange, and everything seems to be placed in the most annoying, or uncomfortable place.

    Also the electronic handbrake on them has a national reputation for failing completely either by not working - or working at times when it shouldn't - i.e. whilst do ~70mph down a lump of dual carriageway.....
  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Posts: 79,665
    Oh yeah, that reminds me, the electronics of the car in general are pi** poor. keeps locking and unlocking itself, switching the hazards on and off, and opening and closing the windows.

    Seems to be cause by having a big box full of electronics underneath the passenger seat footwell, rather than nice and high up out of the way.
  • Alex
    Alex Posts: 2,086
    Nick,

    That's the boggo spec one :(
  • Richie63
    Richie63 Posts: 2,132
    Why has no-one asked why in a BMW in the first place


    WHY?
    I'm going to blow the bank on a new build ( within reason ) NOW DONE!!
    http://i570.photobucket.com/albums/ss14 ... 010362.jpg
  • nicklouse
    nicklouse Posts: 50,673
    Alex wrote:
    Nick,

    That's the boggo spec one :(

    what else do you expect as a rental while your car is having warranty work done. :wink:
    "Do not follow where the path may lead, Go instead where there is no path, and Leave a Trail."
    Parktools :?:SheldonBrown
  • Briggo
    Briggo Posts: 3,537
    nicklouse wrote:
    Yep.

    Oh and

    140 KMH in the BMW 2,5K RPM. in the Swift 4,5 RPM

    Thats a bad thing because?

    Remember its a diesel, the power is lower down, 2.5k is probably where you want to be for the turbo to be spooled up ready.

    I drove a 1 series and that was pants, although the engine was nice.

    My old E36 (R Reg) 325 was a dream to drive, so smooth and the straight 6 engine made such an awesome sound.
  • bentes
    bentes Posts: 286
    Briggo wrote:

    Thats a bad thing because?

    I think you missed the point. :wink:
  • Also the electronic handbrake on them has a national reputation for failing completely either by not working - or working at times when it shouldn't - i.e. whilst do ~70mph down a lump of dual carriageway.....
    That's one of the reasons we got a Jetta instead of the Passat, bigger boot, more ecenomical, cheaper, and there's less to go wrong. Never gone wrong at all, hell, it even towed a BMW out of the snow last winter.
    "Youth's a mask, but it don't last
    live it long and live it fast."
    My dustcap topic:
    http://www.bikeradar.com/mtb/forum/view ... &highlight
  • nicklouse
    nicklouse Posts: 50,673
    bentes wrote:
    Briggo wrote:

    Thats a bad thing because?

    I think you missed the point. :wink:

    totally.
    "Do not follow where the path may lead, Go instead where there is no path, and Leave a Trail."
    Parktools :?:SheldonBrown
  • Tartanyak
    Tartanyak Posts: 1,538
    Briggo wrote:


    My old E36 (R Reg) 325 was a dream to drive, so smooth and the straight 6 engine made such an awesome sound.

    325 at R reg? Did that have the M52 engine in or the older one? I asked because I've got an S reg 323i with the newer 2.5 in.

    I agree though. Gorgeously smooth and sounds so nice. Also just nicely wafts everywhere.
  • Briggo
    Briggo Posts: 3,537
    bentes wrote:
    Briggo wrote:

    Thats a bad thing because?

    I think you missed the point. :wink:

    Perhaps I have, do pray tell.

    Oh and yes it was a 323, not 325, I always used to say its a 325 as people used to say "but if its got a 2.5 engine in it surely it should be 325 not 323"

    Got bored of explaining its a restricted 325 engine in the exhaust section.

    The car was in that lovely purply blue colour.
  • Tartanyak
    Tartanyak Posts: 1,538
    See, I thought it was designated 323 rather than 325 to differentiate it from the old 325 coupes with the old engines.