Which is the better bike????
Comments
-
Whoops,
I misunderstood. Thanks very much for clearing that up.
2009 Boardman Pro FS0 -
marcel147 wrote:I have read & researched all I can.
Nooooo, how can one resist the Stumpy, its lines are so sexy. My head is battered :shock:
You may have read and researched all you want but till you get that leg over the bike you wont truly know.
Im guessing your thought process is based on reviews and looks.0 -
I agree with trying them out. But the Boardman has the better spec, almost every part. I'd take a reba over a float rl anyday, has much more adjustment an tunability. That said the triad shades the monarch, but even the monarch has floodgate.0
-
Briggo wrote:marcel147 wrote:I have read & researched all I can.
Nooooo, how can one resist the Stumpy, its lines are so sexy. My head is battered :shock:
You may have read and researched all you want but till you get that leg over the bike you wont truly know.
Im guessing your thought process is based on reviews and looks.
Correct, the Stumpy looks best and the ex8 I guess would be the better specced bike
2009 Boardman Pro FS0 -
supersonic wrote:I agree with trying them out. But the Boardman has the better spec, almost every part. I'd take a reba over a float rl anyday, has much more adjustment an tunability. That said the triad shades the monarch, but even the monarch has floodgate.
2009 Boardman Pro FS0 -
marcel147 wrote:supersonic wrote:I agree with trying them out. But the Boardman has the better spec, almost every part. I'd take a reba over a float rl anyday, has much more adjustment an tunability. That said the triad shades the monarch, but even the monarch has floodgate.
http://www.bikeradar.com/gear/category/ ... 8-10-36868
I'm guessing you've seen the review.0 -
Yep, the EX8 is the trail bike of the year, but the Boardman won awards too.
And the Boardman is still better specced, and probably lighter too.
Go and see them in the shops.0 -
supersonic wrote:I agree with trying them out. But the Boardman has the better spec, almost every part. I'd take a reba over a float rl anyday, has much more adjustment an tunability. That said the triad shades the monarch, but even the monarch has floodgate.
Disagree entirely on the fork, the other half has 120mm Rebas on her focus and the floats are so much more better, give a much better feel and control (yes I did have the Rebas pumped up for my weight when messing around on her bike)
You really must be on the Halfords payroll.0 -
Yes the Boardman is about 20% lighter. Will it's specification make it a better ride though? Hard to tell when I can't test ride them all.
Mountain bike of the year is a pretty strong title to ignore even if spec of boardman is better. And who knows, does all that equipment work in harmony on that frame???
2009 Boardman Pro FS0 -
Briggo wrote:supersonic wrote:I agree with trying them out. But the Boardman has the better spec, almost every part. I'd take a reba over a float rl anyday, has much more adjustment an tunability. That said the triad shades the monarch, but even the monarch has floodgate.
Disagree entirely on the fork, the other half has 120mm Rebas on her focus and the floats are so much more better, give a much better feel and control (yes I did have the Rebas pumped up for my weight when messing around on her bike)
You really must be on the Halfords payroll.
Erm, no, if you read all my posts on Halfords you will see they are not all complimentary. Farfrom it. But credit where credit is due, I haven't let some stories bias my opinion.
Ah, but did you set the sag, negative air, comp damping and threshold? The weight guides are useless. The Floats are easier to get on and ride with middle of the road settings, but the Reba, with time, I find better to tune to almost any feel you want.
I prefer the Reba, you prefer the Float0 -
marcel147 wrote:Yes the Boardman is about 20% lighter. Will it's specification make it a better ride though? Hard to tell when I can't test ride them all.
Mountain bike of the year is a pretty strong title to ignore even if spec of boardman is better. And who knows, does all that equipment work in harmony on that frame???
All are excellent bikes, the Boardman and Trek winning awards at WMB. On paper the Boardman, IMO, has the better spec. Not being able to test throws a spanner in the works.
Very unlikely you will go wrong with any of them. But personally, I'd take the better equipped, lighter bike and pocket the change.0 -
I am so upset, it was too expensive for me
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=380313868361&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT
2009 Boardman Pro FS0 -
marcel147 wrote:I am so upset, it was too expensive for me
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=380313868361&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT
How tall are you? 21.5" frames are for freaks!0 -
bails87 wrote:marcel147 wrote:I am so upset, it was too expensive for me
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=380313868361&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT
How tall are you? 21.5" frames are for freaks!
In which case, I am the exact height central to a 20" frame according to their chart.
2009 Boardman Pro FS0 -
For me, I'd go for the Boardman and do the servicing myself. If you can't use a spanner then buy a Trek.CAAD9
Kona Jake the Snake
Merlin Malt 40 -
Buckled_Rims wrote:For me, I'd go for the Boardman and do the servicing myself. If you can't use a spanner then buy a Trek.
2009 Boardman Pro FS0 -
supersonic wrote:For years the same company made Carrera and Specialized bikes.....
Supersonic is totally correct!!
Don't be a marketing victim.
Boardman is the better bike and better value! the extra cash will go a long way for upgrades!!Constantly trying to upgrade my parts.It is a long road ahead as things are so expensive for little gain. n+1 is always the principle in my mind.0 -
mikeyj28 wrote:Supersonic is totally correct!!
Don't be a marketing victim.
Boardman is the better bike and better value! the extra cash will go a long way for upgrades!!
My mistake earlier, the Boardman is only 10% lighter! That quite a saving however.
2009 Boardman Pro FS0