Anything Sram produces is a bad option if you want a good quality reliable groupset.
If this is what you are looking for, Campagnolo is the answer.
Not bigging up SRAM by any means but I've not seen any bad words on the chainsets myself .......Campag UT on the other hand...... that's had a fair chunk of bad press in its time.
The Campag stuff certainly looks the business though.
Facts are meaningless, you can use facts to prove anything that's remotely true! - Homer
Posts
triple ?
compact ?
BB30 or std ?
threaded BB shell or pressfit ?
alu or carbon ?
http://www.ribblecycles.co.uk/sp/road-t ... RAMCHAR200
http://www.ribblecycles.co.uk/sp/road-t ... RAMCHAR240
I have the Red and it's light, stiff and handsome....
Otherwise Campagnolo carbon UT
If this is what you are looking for, Campagnolo is the answer.
The cups aren't in a brilliant state (someone was a little heavy handed installing them so they have a few scratches etc. round the outsides!)
LOL ... I don't much care for SRAM either though their chainsets are among the better parts of the groups.
Not bigging up SRAM by any means but I've not seen any bad words on the chainsets myself .......Campag UT on the other hand...... that's had a fair chunk of bad press in its time.
The Campag stuff certainly looks the business though.
http://fairwheelbikes.com/forum/viewtop ... =77&t=5991
Not much in it between Red and Record in terms of performance
Q-factor would be a PITA coming from Campagnolo.
I find CULT bearings the smoothest of the main manufacturers' offerings.
And IMO Campagnolo carbon looks far nicer than Red.
But the 52-36 option is sweet - wish Campag offered that stock.