Posh Man marries Posh Woman - & moves to wales

RichN95.

nicensleazy wrote:

I suppose the tax payer has to again pick up the bill :twisted:

And then they'll reap the benefits. This wedding could be worth over a billion quid to the British economy (according to a business bloke on the radio today).

As an investment, it's a golden opportunity. It'll give a far superior return than the Olympics, for example.

Some people are too dumb to see the bigger picture, I guess.

tx14

RichN95 wrote:

nicensleazy wrote:

I suppose the tax payer has to again pick up the bill :twisted:

And then they'll reap the benefits. This wedding could be worth over a billion quid to the British economy (according to a business bloke on the radio today).

As an investment, it's a golden opportunity. It'll give a far superior return than the Olympics, for example.

Some people are too dumb to see the bigger picture, I guess.

big return over a week perhaps, with no long term effects.
don't really care about it tbh, a famous couple got married, so what?

RichN95.

tx14 wrote:

big return over a week perhaps, with no long term effects.

So you think that what is effectively a 4+ hour advert for Britain on TVs all over the world, isn't going to help tourism?

And then there's the government using wedding invitations as leverage to secure business contracts (same as businesses inviting clients to Wimbledon, but on a grander scale)

etc, etc.

nicensleazy

And do you really think the British tax payer will see a return on their money spend, I hardly think so........we just keep on paying!

ratsbeyfus

Don't forget the lucrative tea-towel sales as well.

softlad

RichN95 wrote:

So you think that what is effectively a 4+ hour advert for Britain on TVs all over the world, isn't going to help tourism?

And then there's the government using wedding invitations as leverage to secure business contracts (same as businesses inviting clients to Wimbledon, but on a grander scale)

etc, etc.

are you making this up..?

BarryBonds

afx237vi wrote:

gavintc wrote:

Tonymufc wrote:

What makes me laugh is some toff on the radio has just said "its just what the country needs". Feck me how out of touch are these people. The next news story was about how GMP had to save 130 million quid and the impending job losses.

I am no royalist, but I do think this will have a morale boost to the nation. The British public do like the Royals and weddings and this will go down well.

Really? Can't say I've ever met many royalists in my neck of the woods.

Join me and sit on my right side in the revoloution brother

MattC59

I've just seen on TV that it's expected that the wedding will bring and extra £1 Billion into the economy.

That'll do !

ratsbeyfus

Can I have my share of that (about £16) up front as I'm a bit skint at the mo'?

tx14

RichN95 wrote:

tx14 wrote:

big return over a week perhaps, with no long term effects.

So you think that what is effectively a 4+ hour advert for Britain on TVs all over the world, isn't going to help tourism?

And then there's the government using wedding invitations as leverage to secure business contracts (same as businesses inviting clients to Wimbledon, but on a grander scale)

etc, etc.

cos everyone in the world would tune in for a 4 hour commercial.
you can't make this stuff up!

Bob.F

Was never a fan of Diana, didn't buy into the puppy eyes innocence. Wasn't sorry when she failed to belt up in the back, if she had she could of crawled out and walked away.
Good luck to them, glad to see he didn't get too dirty digging her up to get the ring back

I'll get me coat then.......

RichN95.

ratsbeyfus wrote:

Can I have my share of that (about £16) up front as I'm a bit skint at the mo'?

No, because you've shown an unwillingness to shell out the £1 the wedding will cost you - so you get nothing.

ratsbeyfus

RichN95 wrote:

ratsbeyfus wrote:

Can I have my share of that (about £16) up front as I'm a bit skint at the mo'?

No, because you've shown an unwillingness to shell out the £1 the wedding will cost you - so you get nothing.

Can I have £15 then?

berliner

Can't believe she's not been tampered with. Must be a big wad ready from The NOTW

BarryBonds

my god what a lot of bitter twisted losers you are, when given the opportunity to ride against capitalism you mock yet this 2 people getting married causes outpourings of bitterness and bile.

sad sad losers you will be the first to be thrown in a well or catapulted into tunnel walls when the revoloution comes

Crapaud

Could someone remind me ...


... which one's William?

gavintc

BarryBonds wrote:

afx237vi wrote:

gavintc wrote:

Tonymufc wrote:

What makes me laugh is some toff on the radio has just said "its just what the country needs". Feck me how out of touch are these people. The next news story was about how GMP had to save 130 million quid and the impending job losses.

I am no royalist, but I do think this will have a morale boost to the nation. The British public do like the Royals and weddings and this will go down well.

Really? Can't say I've ever met many royalists in my neck of the woods.

Join me and sit on my right side in the revoloution brother

I am a bit confused here. I thought communists supported inherited autocracy. Or is that only in the real world, not the imaginary world of student politics.

gavintc

Daily Mash has an excellent take on the impending betrothal:

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/soci ... 011163260/

northernneil

cheapskate prince didnt even fork out for a ring, palmed off a secondhand one from his dead mother

bexley5200

1981 all over again

Stewie Griffin

bexley5200 wrote:

1981 all over again

As long as Im going to be 11 again then.

Jez mon

tx14 wrote:

RichN95 wrote:

tx14 wrote:

big return over a week perhaps, with no long term effects.

So you think that what is effectively a 4+ hour advert for Britain on TVs all over the world, isn't going to help tourism?

And then there's the government using wedding invitations as leverage to secure business contracts (same as businesses inviting clients to Wimbledon, but on a grander scale)

etc, etc.

cos everyone in the world would tune in for a 4 hour commercial.
you can't make this stuff up!

The superbowl is one of the most watched sporting events in the world...and that's mainly commercials

ratsbeyfus

Stewie Griffin wrote:

bexley5200 wrote:

1981 all over again

As long as Im going to be 11 again then.

And Spurs win the cup!

Stewie Griffin

ratsbeyfus wrote:

Stewie Griffin wrote:

bexley5200 wrote:

1981 all over again

As long as Im going to be 11 again then.

And Spurs win the cup!

Indeedy Sir 8)

plowmar

If the country will benefit to the tune of £1bn if we stump up part of the costs, how much will the country get if we pay zilch?

There will still be a wedding.

Has anyone added in the sick buckets?

nicensleazy

I have had enough of this Royal wedding.........interviewing Kate's hairdress, talk about scrapping the barrel!

Frank the tank

In other news, Iran have dropped a nuclear bomb on Israel.

Frank the tank

Some royal commentator on tv this morning said they're both self made millionaires and had not inherited their wealth. Well I'd call that observation into quetion but thew fact they're millionaires more than enables them to pay for their own wedding; and the hard pressed tax payer shouldn't have to stump up a ha'penny.

tx14

Jez mon wrote:

tx14 wrote:

RichN95 wrote:

tx14 wrote:

big return over a week perhaps, with no long term effects.

So you think that what is effectively a 4+ hour advert for Britain on TVs all over the world, isn't going to help tourism?

And then there's the government using wedding invitations as leverage to secure business contracts (same as businesses inviting clients to Wimbledon, but on a grander scale)

etc, etc.

cos everyone in the world would tune in for a 4 hour commercial.
you can't make this stuff up!

The superbowl is one of the most watched sporting events in the world...and that's mainly commercials

this is a comment on sports fans.

ynyswen24

Bread and Circuses.