Chloe Victoria - X Factor contestant

northernneil
northernneil Posts: 1,549
edited September 2010 in The bottom bracket
I hated her and her attitude when I first saw her....

she emptiomised everything sh!t about society.....

she loved herself.....

and it turns out she is actualy a coke snorting, skanky hooker and now been kicked off the show.

:lol:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBISLcpTzo8&feature=related

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1315346/X-Factor-2010-Chloe-Mafia-kicked-cocaine-snorting-revelations.html
«13

Comments

  • what a hideous thing she is.
  • I would argue that paper encourages everything that is wrong with society far more than someone on a TV show.

    Of course she probably isn't the brightest tool but a national paper slating her like this is just wrong. Can't imagine what it must be like for her, especially if she is not too smart. Going overboard like this can lead to people being suicidal I can imagine. Maybe a bit over the top but you get my point.

    At the end of the day, she is no worse than many people. I know some people will slate me for this but if she wants to be a hooker then good for her, better (IMO) than a waster who lives their life on the dole, drinking and smoking in front of their kids and making no attempt to bring them up.

    The thought of some of the mail readers judging people on reality shows (or anyone else for that matter) really makes me mad. Point for note - I can't stand those TV shows!

    And breathe...
  • Gazzaputt
    Gazzaputt Posts: 3,227
    That is everything that is wrong in our society.
  • spen666
    spen666 Posts: 17,709
    I hated her and her attitude when I first saw her....

    she emptiomised everything sh!t about society.....

    she loved herself.....

    and it turns out she is actualy a coke snorting, skanky hooker and now been kicked off the show.

    :lol:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBISLcpTzo8&feature=related

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1315346/X-Factor-2010-Chloe-Mafia-kicked-cocaine-snorting-revelations.html


    Interesting (over)reaction to someone you have never apparently met. How can you hate someone you have never met?

    I dislike what I have read about her behavioour and attitude, but hate is not something I can have for someone I do not know.

    BTW, by posting this thread, you have of course given her the oxygen of publicity
    Want to know the Spen666 behind the posts?
    Then read MY BLOG @ http://www.pebennett.com

    Twittering @spen_666
  • spen666
    spen666 Posts: 17,709
    BenBlyth wrote:
    ...

    Of course she probably isn't the brightest tool but a national paper slating her like this is just wrong.
    ...

    We are in the mess as a society we find ourselves in because of this sort of attitude.

    Failing to condemn that which is wrong encourages that bad behaviour.

    We would do far better if we condemn that behaviour which offends society's morals

    BTW whilst you condemn the (right wing) Mail for this sort of story, it originated in the (Sunday) Mirror, a (so called) left wing paper
    Want to know the Spen666 behind the posts?
    Then read MY BLOG @ http://www.pebennett.com

    Twittering @spen_666
  • Total skank.
    Let's close our eyes and see what happens
  • softlad
    softlad Posts: 3,513
    that bird makes Jordan look normal.....
  • mrushton
    mrushton Posts: 5,182
    edited September 2010
    Ah but these people thrive (and their agents) on the oxygen of publicity - and the media encourage it. Don't know who she is but she is probably quite normal in certain areas of showbiz. I don't/won't watch the programme so I guess her rise/fall will pass me by - but she'll get her 15 mins

    Oh, I've watched it now. Rough Northern chavette (I'm from Mcr) who prob. spends too many nights at KarryOki. That Pussycat Doll - tho', she looks class. Pity to put them in the same show.
    M.Rushton
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Gazzaputt wrote:
    That is everything that is wrong in our society.

    But not the people who pay to sleep with her?

    :?
  • spen666 wrote:
    BenBlyth wrote:
    ...

    Of course she probably isn't the brightest tool but a national paper slating her like this is just wrong.
    ...

    We are in the mess as a society we find ourselves in because of this sort of attitude.

    Failing to condemn that which is wrong encourages that bad behaviour.

    We would do far better if we condemn that behaviour which offends society's morals

    BTW whilst you condemn the (right wing) Mail for this sort of story, it originated in the (Sunday) Mirror, a (so called) left wing paper

    I knew this would happen when I posted what I did.

    My point isn't that people shouldn't be responsible for their actions, in fact I agree that far too often people don't take responsibility. It is always someone elses fault.

    My issue is that it is totally disproportionate the criticism she is getting. If you subject someone who may not be particually bright (I don't know her, she may be very sharp) to national press hounding her, you may end with somebody's life being ruined when, in the scheme of things, other than the fact you just don't like her on Xfactor what has she really done wrong.

    My point is, is it reasonably that a young girl is ridiculed in front of the nation because she 'probably' took drugs socially and she had sex, yes sex, with somebody for money.

    Where as many middle class, maybe even mail readers spend every saturday night on drugs, going home with which ever toff takes them on the most expensive date that week.

    This is not directed at you spen but if we have a discussion about this can people please not change this to make out I am saying people are not responsible for their actions, nor do I think 'chav's are poor little lambs. I guarantee you I don't.
  • Spen - I forgot to add. Ultimately I don't care what paper it is in. I don't read the papers. I am getting at the fact that it is in a paper which in turn leads people to believe certain things.

    If the paper had written that story telling how hard a life she has had, how her father left her, how she had to provide for her little sister from the age of 7 (All made up for the point of my argument) people would have a totally differing view of exactly the same facts (i.e. none really).
  • Gazzaputt wrote:
    That is everything that is wrong in our society.

    But not the people who pay to sleep with her?

    :?

    +1
  • It's freakshow karaoke - the point is to watch this crap and feel superior.
  • Gazzaputt
    Gazzaputt Posts: 3,227
    Gazzaputt wrote:
    That is everything that is wrong in our society.

    But not the people who pay to sleep with her?

    :?

    Wasn't actually pointing at her being on the game but I suppose she needs to pay for her coke habit.

    Single mother poncing off the state but has enough time to go out lashing it up and sticking a few grams up her nose.

    Love to know who looks after the poor kid. Hopefully social services will look into this.
  • whoops sorry, I appear to have wandered into a BNP forum.
    The dissenter is every human being at those moments of his life when he resigns
    momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Gazzaputt wrote:
    Gazzaputt wrote:
    That is everything that is wrong in our society.

    But not the people who pay to sleep with her?

    :?

    Wasn't actually pointing at her being on the game but I suppose she needs to pay for her coke habit.

    Single mother poncing off the state but has enough time to go out lashing it up and sticking a few grams up her nose.

    Love to know who looks after the poor kid. Hopefully social services will look into this.

    I don't think you're in a position to suggest whether social services should look after her children.
  • Yes he is. He knowss all that needs to be known about the case...
  • bails87
    bails87 Posts: 12,998
    BenBlyth wrote:
    Spen - I forgot to add. Ultimately I don't care what paper it is in. I don't read the papers. I am getting at the fact that it is in a paper which in turn leads people to believe certain things.

    +1

    Why should left/right wing be relevant? It's a sh1t tabloid "writing" sh1t stories. Challenging tabloid lies has nothing to do with the left/right wings in principle. In reality it's often the right wing that does best off them.
    MTB/CX

    "As I said last time, it won't happen again."
  • I am sure a long, fruitful career in adult films beckons for her

    still hate her .... or is the phrase "i have an intense dislike of her" more acceptable on here :?
  • Im indifferent to her, does that mean that I win? Hate is a funny thing, she certainly isnt worth the effort that hatred needs. Unlike that berk in the tabloids last week with getting on for 15 kids from fat birds he picks up on buses.
  • BenBlyth wrote:
    spen666 wrote:
    BenBlyth wrote:
    ...

    Of course she probably isn't the brightest tool but a national paper slating her like this is just wrong.
    ...

    We are in the mess as a society we find ourselves in because of this sort of attitude.

    Failing to condemn that which is wrong encourages that bad behaviour.

    We would do far better if we condemn that behaviour which offends society's morals

    BTW whilst you condemn the (right wing) Mail for this sort of story, it originated in the (Sunday) Mirror, a (so called) left wing paper


    My issue is that it is totally disproportionate the criticism she is getting. If you subject someone who may not be particually bright (I don't know her, she may be very sharp) to national press hounding her, you may end with somebody's life being ruined when, in the scheme of things, other than the fact you just don't like her on Xfactor what has she really done wrong.

    My point is, is it reasonably that a young girl is ridiculed in front of the nation because she 'probably' took drugs socially and she had sex, yes sex, with somebody for money.

    I haven't a clue who she is and not in any hurry to find out but I'm a little baffled by the idea newspaper coverage could ruin her life as it sounds like she is already there does it not? Besides if you don't like the idea of press coverage why even go within a hundred miles of an audition for a televised 'talent' show? X factor has been going long enough (sadly) for anyone with half a functioning brain to know that if you don't want your life picked apart by the unscruplous newpapers you should leave it well alone.
  • I tell you what's worse.

    A national paper's article riddled with grammatical errors.

    Now it's that type of behaviour that's bringing this county to it's knees
    Expertly coached by http://www.vitessecyclecoaching.co.uk/

    http://vineristi.wordpress.com - the blog for Viner owners and lovers!
  • Im indifferent to her, does that mean that I win? Hate is a funny thing, she certainly isnt worth the effort that hatred needs. Unlike that berk in the tabloids last week with getting on for 15 kids from fat birds he picks up on buses.

    I'll make a note of that. Been trying to find fat slappers to shag for weeks now
    Expertly coached by http://www.vitessecyclecoaching.co.uk/

    http://vineristi.wordpress.com - the blog for Viner owners and lovers!
  • Im indifferent to her, does that mean that I win? Hate is a funny thing, she certainly isnt worth the effort that hatred needs. Unlike that berk in the tabloids last week with getting on for 15 kids from fat birds he picks up on buses.

    I'll make a note of that. Been trying to find fat slappers to shag for weeks now

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... sure-.html

    There are a few of his conquests in that article. Good luck, but please dont let us know how you are getting along :lol:
  • Im indifferent to her, does that mean that I win? Hate is a funny thing, she certainly isnt worth the effort that hatred needs. Unlike that berk in the tabloids last week with getting on for 15 kids from fat birds he picks up on buses.

    I'll make a note of that. Been trying to find fat slappers to shag for weeks now

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... sure-.html

    There are a few of his conquests in that article. Good luck, but please dont let us know how you are getting along :lol:


    good god ... there isnt enough Viagra and Beer in the world that would make me ......
  • spen666
    spen666 Posts: 17,709
    BenBlyth wrote:
    ...

    I knew this would happen when I posted what I did.

    My point isn't that people shouldn't be responsible for their actions, in fact I agree that far too often people don't take responsibility. It is always someone elses fault.

    My issue is that it is totally disproportionate the criticism she is getting. If you subject someone who may not be particually bright (I don't know her, she may be very sharp) to national press hounding her, you may end with somebody's life being ruined when, in the scheme of things, other than the fact you just don't like her on Xfactor what has she really done wrong.
    She was the one who sought the national publicity. It wasn't the press who brought her to public attention

    My point is, is it reasonably that a young girl is ridiculed in front of the nation because she 'probably' took drugs socially and she had sex, yes sex, with somebody for money
    she seeks the money and fame from publicity.She can't complain when she gets the other side of the coin as well. She can't expect the rewards without the tribulations attacxhed to fame

    Where as many middle class, maybe even mail readers spend every saturday night on drugs, going home with which ever toff takes them on the most expensive date that week.
    How many of those middle class mail readers seek the oxygen of publicity for publicity's sake?

    BTW you do know this is not first TV programme she has been on seeking fame. She was also on Snog Marry Avoid on BBC3.

    I have little sympathy with her. If you want to have the rewards of being in the public eye, you can't complain at the tribulations of being in the public eye

    This is not directed at you spen but if we have a discussion about this can people please not change this to make out I am saying people are not responsible for their actions, nor do I think 'chav's are poor little lambs. I guarantee you I don't.

    Well, if you don't want people to say that, then don't post to the effect that they are all poor little lambs. MTFU and have the courage to stand by your words.
    Want to know the Spen666 behind the posts?
    Then read MY BLOG @ http://www.pebennett.com

    Twittering @spen_666
  • spen666
    spen666 Posts: 17,709
    bails87 wrote:
    BenBlyth wrote:
    Spen - I forgot to add. Ultimately I don't care what paper it is in. I don't read the papers. I am getting at the fact that it is in a paper which in turn leads people to believe certain things.

    +1

    Why should left/right wing be relevant? It's a sh1t tabloid "writing" sh1t stories. Challenging tabloid lies has nothing to do with the left/right wings in principle. In reality it's often the right wing that does best off them.

    So what lies are these then?

    The mirror produced the photos and published them. The facebook / bebo / escort ads are there on the net for all to see.

    What lies are there?

    Interesting how you call the tabloid sh*t, yet you make the baseless accusation against that paper. it backed up its story with evidence

    Again you go onto claim left wing/ right wing is irrelevant then accuse the right wing of doing better out of these things. Despite the fact the story was broken by a left leaning paper- namely the Mirror

    Strange how truth is something you accuse other of ignoring, yet the fact sems to be that your post has less truth than most
    Want to know the Spen666 behind the posts?
    Then read MY BLOG @ http://www.pebennett.com

    Twittering @spen_666
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    Spen - isn't the issue that when the public sees someone who clearly has serious problems - problems enough that she takes to prostitution to fund a drug habbit - rather than sympathise and try to help her, they do the opposite...
  • spen666
    spen666 Posts: 17,709
    Spen - isn't the issue that when the public sees someone who clearly has serious problems - problems enough that she takes to prostitution to fund a drug habbit - rather than sympathise and try to help her, they do the opposite...

    She shows no signs of wanting help.

    Its a different matter and society would treat her differently if she was trying to do something about her drug habit.
    Want to know the Spen666 behind the posts?
    Then read MY BLOG @ http://www.pebennett.com

    Twittering @spen_666
  • rake
    rake Posts: 3,204
    what the hell do they see in him? :?
    is there no part of the blame on the other halfs either, 15 of them have que'd up. what did they expect. its irrelevant what paper its reported in. its the state of britain today.