A place becoming a cesspool .....................

13»

Comments

  • moray_gub
    moray_gub Posts: 3,328
    micron wrote:
    MG, simply pointing out the law in rebuttal to your Fabiani fuelled assertion that Landis automatically stood to gain from the whistle blower suit, which is a false assertion. I'm actually really surprised at such a rigorous poster as yourself swallowing Fabiani's spin and bluster at face value and not using a little critical thinking to decide for yourself whether his assertions are 100% accurate.

    My point regarding Fabiani was he said FL was a liar a cheat and a swindler and this is correct. As far as making money out of it we will have to wait and see on that one but i am sure Fabiani is more on the money that you . Then again maybe Dennis is right maybe you do know more than others maybe its time for you to contact Novitsky and tell him all.
    Gasping - but somehow still alive !
  • dennisn
    dennisn Posts: 10,601
    micron wrote:
    MG, simply pointing out the law in rebuttal to your Fabiani fuelled assertion that Landis automatically stood to gain from the whistle blower suit, which is a false assertion. I'm actually really surprised at such a rigorous poster as yourself swallowing Fabiani's spin and bluster at face value and not using a little critical thinking to decide for yourself whether his assertions are 100% accurate.

    I'm not sure that using using "critical thinking" is going to prove anyone's, and I mean anyone's, assertations ae 100% correct.
  • dennisn
    dennisn Posts: 10,601
    Moray Gub wrote:
    andyp wrote:
    See this page for the 'reverence';

    http://www.bikeradar.com/forum/viewtopi ... &start=220

    My quote celebrating old dopers;

    "1998 was guff? :shock: "

    The 1998 Tour was exciting in your eyes due to the use of performance enhancing drugs mainly by the winner the doped fuelled Marco Pantani. Its a bit like Wrestling you enjoy it but you know its fake.

    Now you've gone way too far MG. Wrestling is FAKE? Think what you're saying man. Have you no concern or feelings for all the Hulkamaniacs out there? :wink::wink:
  • moray_gub
    moray_gub Posts: 3,328
    dennisn wrote:
    Moray Gub wrote:
    andyp wrote:
    See this page for the 'reverence';

    http://www.bikeradar.com/forum/viewtopi ... &start=220

    My quote celebrating old dopers;

    "1998 was guff? :shock: "

    The 1998 Tour was exciting in your eyes due to the use of performance enhancing drugs mainly by the winner the doped fuelled Marco Pantani. Its a bit like Wrestling you enjoy it but you know its fake.

    Now you've gone way too far MG. Wrestling is FAKE? Think what you're saying man. Have you no concern or feelings for all the Hulkamaniacs out there? :wink::wink:

    You mean after all this time you didnt know he was really David Banner :lol:
    Gasping - but somehow still alive !
  • andyp
    andyp Posts: 10,549
    Moray Gub wrote:
    Was this EPO test conducted the normal way and in the normal timescales was the rider informed of his positive test and how did his disciplinary hearing go ? You could drive a horse and cart through that evidence the point remains at the moment he is a suspected doper. That may well change but for the now youre just gonna have to wait until you get your pound of flesh meanwhile just keep revering these exciting old dopers.

    You're very quick to throw accusations of hypocrisy and reverence around yet are guilty as any of us of exactly the same behaviour.

    Pantani, just like Armstrong, was never sanctioned for a doping offence, yet it's okay for you to call him a doper, but not for others to make the same accusation of Armstrong.


    hy·poc·ri·sy
       /hɪˈpɒkrəsi/ Show Spelled[hi-pok-ruh-see]
    –noun, plural -sies.
    1. a pretense of having a virtuous character, moral or religious beliefs or principles, etc., that one does not really possess.
    2.a pretense of having some desirable or publicly approved attitude.