Shimano Di2................

paul.d
paul.d Posts: 82
edited February 2010 in Road buying advice
just had it retro fitted to my Cervelo RS-a revelation! it does everything it says on the box-the reviews don't lie-it realy is that good IMHO
«1

Comments

  • redddraggon
    redddraggon Posts: 10,862
    If I had the money I'd do it too.
    I like bikes...

    Twitter
    Flickr
  • paul.d
    paul.d Posts: 82
    Iwas really looking at a replacement second bike-but having read the reviews-and being a gadget freak!-I took the plunge-I've just got the LBS to swap the Ultegra from the RS to the second bike-Trek 1400
  • EKIMIKE
    EKIMIKE Posts: 2,232
    You must have a seriously satisfying riding experience. Lovely frame, perfect groupset. What more could anyone want? I'd love to try out Di2.
  • giant_man
    giant_man Posts: 6,878
    I don't get what the fuss is about personally. Am I right in saying that what it does is to trim the front mech for you instead of you having to do it. Is that right?

    And there's me thinking it should change gear for you depending on the gradient of the road ahead - doh! :roll:
  • rake
    rake Posts: 3,204
    it also overshoots on the shift slightly to speed up the change .
  • Add me to the don't-get-it crowd.

    Perhaps for the professionals, saving 1/5,000,000,000th of a second per gear change and the related 0.3 femtojoule saving in energy by pushing a button instead of flicking a lever is worth it.

    But mere mortals? Pointless doesn't even begin to describe it. It's the answer to a question that should never have been asked IMHO.

    Nice gadget and beautifully engineered, no doubt, but so is the electric door closing mechanism you can specify as an option on your uber-capitalist limousines these days. Equally silly!
    Open One+ BMC TE29 Seven 622SL On One Scandal Cervelo RS
  • ajb72
    ajb72 Posts: 1,178
    congrats Paul, if money were no object I'd be there too! Any chance of a pic of the complete bike?
  • Smokin Joe
    Smokin Joe Posts: 2,706
    Add me to the don't-get-it crowd.

    Perhaps for the professionals, saving 1/5,000,000,000th of a second per gear change and the related 0.3 femtojoule saving in energy by pushing a button instead of flicking a lever is worth it.

    But mere mortals? Pointless doesn't even begin to describe it. It's the answer to a question that should never have been asked IMHO.

    Nice gadget and beautifully engineered, no doubt, but so is the electric door closing mechanism you can specify as an option on your uber-capitalist limousines these days. Equally silly!
    Now where did I here those comments before?

    Ah yes, when indexed gears came out.
    Whenever an extra sprocket appeared on the rear wheel.
    And clipless pedals.
    And dual pivot brakes.
    And integrated shifters.
    And aluminium frames.
    And again with carbon fibre.

    And before my time, but doubtless when pneumatic tyres appeared.
  • inseine
    inseine Posts: 5,788
    Those who don't get it really need to try it.
    Put it this way, if electronic shifting existed before mechanical shifting would you all be saying how great the 'new' mechanical stuff was? I don't think so.
  • APIII
    APIII Posts: 2,010
    Add me to the don't-get-it crowd.

    Perhaps for the professionals, saving 1/5,000,000,000th of a second per gear change and the related 0.3 femtojoule saving in energy by pushing a button instead of flicking a lever is worth it.

    But mere mortals? Pointless doesn't even begin to describe it. It's the answer to a question that should never have been asked IMHO.

    Nice gadget and beautifully engineered, no doubt, but so is the electric door closing mechanism you can specify as an option on your uber-capitalist limousines these days. Equally silly!

    I don't think it's anything to do with speed, just flawless shifting.
  • inseine wrote:
    Those who don't get it really need to try it.
    Put it this way, if electronic shifting existed before mechanical shifting would you all be saying how great the 'new' mechanical stuff was? I don't think so.

    I tried it. I was unimpressed on the whole

    (but then I can set bikes up to shift properly)
  • Slow Downcp
    Slow Downcp Posts: 3,041
    APIII wrote:

    I don't think it's anything to do with speed, just flawless shifting.

    I get that anyway, by setting up my mechs properly.
    Carlsberg don't make cycle clothing, but if they did it would probably still not be as good as Assos
  • Yeah but you don't the thing that really impresses me about Di2 is how it only makes a shift when the cassette is in the correct orientation for the pickup, you cannot get that with a mechanical system.
  • dennisn
    dennisn Posts: 10,601
    I think electronic will be the wave of the future. Sort of like kick starters on motorcycles
    got replaced by electric. At first the purist's complained but no one's squawking now.
    Derailleur's replaced single speeds and things were better. Electronics replaces cables,
    the purist's complain, and yet there are more options with shifters, less adjustments to make, no real downsides that I can see, etc.
  • Pokerface
    Pokerface Posts: 7,960
    Smokin Joe wrote:
    Now where did I here those comments before?

    Ah yes, when indexed gears came out.
    Whenever an extra sprocket appeared on the rear wheel.
    And clipless pedals.
    And dual pivot brakes.
    And integrated shifters.
    And aluminium frames.
    And again with carbon fibre.

    Yes - but these were significant advances.

    Does Di2 make the bike faster/lighter/stronger? Easier to ride? Reduce the number of components?

    Not really. At least not as significantly as some of the things you mentioned.

    But - I still think it's a VERY cool toy and fall into the "if I could afford it I'd buy it" camp.
  • True Dennis but motorbikes are already non-human powered devices.

    I think it's actually at the other end of the market that there is the biggest benefit for electronic. Those who don't know how to/don't want to know how bikes work. They just want to press a button and the gear changes.

    In fact it should really be tied to a power meter and change gears for you based on your power output/torque and hill slope. Automatic gearboxes have to be next.

    Then all it needs is a motor ;-)

    There will always be people who like pure bikes. Just look at the love for steel bikes or fixed gears.
  • cougie
    cougie Posts: 22,512
    It does look lovely - but I'm v happy with my oldschool gears - at least until the electronic kit is the same price anyway.
  • i'm quite happy with a double fixed hub, one side for going up the alps, one for going down... :roll:
  • cougie
    cougie Posts: 22,512
    Actually I do ride fixed in the winter - I have a freewheel on the other side of the hub, but never got round to using it. New fangled technology you see...
  • giant_man
    giant_man Posts: 6,878
    cougie wrote:
    It does look lovely - but I'm v happy with my oldschool gears - at least until the electronic kit is the same price anyway.

    + 1
  • dennisn
    dennisn Posts: 10,601
    Pokerface wrote:
    Smokin Joe wrote:
    Now where did I here those comments before?

    Ah yes, when indexed gears came out.
    Whenever an extra sprocket appeared on the rear wheel.
    And clipless pedals.
    And dual pivot brakes.
    And integrated shifters.
    And aluminium frames.
    And again with carbon fibre.

    Yes - but these were significant advances.

    Does Di2 make the bike faster/lighter/stronger? Easier to ride? Reduce the number of components?

    Not really. At least not as significantly as some of the things you mentioned.

    But - I still think it's a VERY cool toy and fall into the "if I could afford it I'd buy it" camp.

    I sort of agree with "smokin..." in that I've heard this all before and sure enough things are BETTER. As for electronic shifting being a significant advantage?? Very few products ever offer significant advances over previous versions. It's all about little improvements as time goes by. Maybe cable shifting has come to as good as it's going to get(at least for now) and electronic is the way to better things or at the very least the way forward.
  • inseine
    inseine Posts: 5,788
    There are always people who think todays technology is far enough, but would you have said that 10 years ago, or 20? I think electronic shifting is a big leap or a least as big as some of the others mentioned.
    Would be go back to non hidden cables or frames with cable clips everywhere or quill stems or a dozen other things that didn't revolutionise cycling but make bikes a bit nicer in a small way?
  • paul.d
    paul.d Posts: 82
    for the poster who said "when its as cheap as a mechanical system" it is! at wiggle

    http://www.wiggle.co.uk/p/cycle/7/Focus ... 360037580/

    http://www.wiggle.co.uk/p/cycle/7/Focus ... 360037578/

    it must be a bargain for the Di2 version
  • inseine
    inseine Posts: 5,788
    Don't go posting links like that on here! Especially when some of us have just bought a new steed.......
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 43,686
    I never used to get it but then I tried it and it is brilliant. Would I spend my hard earned on it though? No, not unless money was no object. I also still have concerns about its longevity but (obviously) time will tell if these are justified!
  • Smokin Joe
    Smokin Joe Posts: 2,706
    cougie wrote:
    It does look lovely - but I'm v happy with my oldschool gears - at least until the electronic kit is the same price anyway.

    + 1
    Same here, but the price will come down. STI/Ergo were very very expensive when they first appeared but now we all use them. The electronics in Di2 are no more advanced than those in remote control toy helicopters you can buy for a tenner.
  • Pokerface
    Pokerface Posts: 7,960
    paul.d wrote:
    for the poster who said "when its as cheap as a mechanical system" it is! at wiggle

    http://www.wiggle.co.uk/p/cycle/7/Focus ... 360037580/
    it must be a bargain for the Di2 version

    My LBS had a guy bring in the Focus that you linked. The LBS was tasked with stripping the Di2 stuff off the focus and attaching it to what can only be described as a cheap-@ss winter-like frame.

    Basically the guy got the deal on the Focus - bought it so he could have the groupset - and is now selling the Focus (with the Campag parts that were attached to his cr@p frame).


    I guess it's one way to upgrade, but I would have started with the frame myself.
  • eh
    eh Posts: 4,854
    Not very green is it. Neither is it very innovative, only replicates what already happens.

    Still on the plus side you can knock a competitor out of a race using a simple pair of scissors :twisted:
  • Silly question but when the battery goes flat, do the derailleurs stay in the gear they are in?
  • rake
    rake Posts: 3,204
    Pross wrote:
    I never used to get it but then I tried it and it is brilliant. Would I spend my hard earned on it though? No, not unless money was no object. I also still have concerns about its longevity but (obviously) time will tell if these are justified!
    i dont think it will be a problem of lonevity unless its crashed or something. most of the force and stress on parts in a cable system are caused by the heavy springs that pull the cable. these are not present in the servo operated derailers it can push and pull so there is not as much effort to move like a spring. this is whythe battery can last a long time. its very nice but not at the Current porice.