Skinny or muscular legs?

akcc05
akcc05 Posts: 336
It's been bugging me for while now: Some of us cycle and have huge thighs and calves, but some of us also get super skinny legs, why is that? Is it down to the type of training and nutritions etc?

Comments

  • dewei
    dewei Posts: 172
    I think genes account for a lot of the difference. Training and nutrition are also important.
    I will always be of slight build with nice calves...unless I take drugs :wink: .

    Calves: Apparent size depends on the insertion point of the calf muscle - actual function is not affected.. There is therefore a limit to how much you can do to change the size
  • genes my friend :) maybe training methods will improve muscular performance but genes are the main thing here.
    Coveryourcar.co.uk RT Tester
    north west of england.
  • akcc05
    akcc05 Posts: 336
    I didn't know that about the calf muscle insertion point thing. I guess i will stay skinny, not that it is a bad thing. Nice to know though. Thanks guys!
  • Bhima
    Bhima Posts: 2,145
    Body fat % makes a massive difference. Mine look like sticks now, but were like tree-tunks last year, despite my muscles being smaller back then.
  • a_n_t
    a_n_t Posts: 2,011
    Bhima wrote:
    Body fat % makes a massive difference. Mine look like sticks now.


    I sometimes wonder how mine actually manage to turn the pedals!
    Manchester wheelers

    PB's
    10m 20:21 2014
    25m 53:18 20:13
    50m 1:57:12 2013
    100m Yeah right.
  • Bhima
    Bhima Posts: 2,145
    Yeah, I know...

    But if you think yours are bad Ant, have a look at this chap:

    [Pic]

    :shock: He looks about 10!
  • jgsi
    jgsi Posts: 5,062
    akcc05 wrote:
    It's been bugging me for while now: Some of us cycle and have huge thighs and calves, but some of us also get super skinny legs, why is that? Is it down to the type of training and nutritions etc?

    I stand to be corrected, but it is down to genetics what body type you 'inherit' whatever 'short term training regime 'you might undertake.
  • Bhima wrote:
    Yeah, I know...

    But if you think yours are bad Ant, have a look at this chap:

    [Pic]

    :shock: He looks about 10!

    Mine are still skinnier :o
  • What about these ones from Brad Wiggins at paris-roubaix earlier this year. Didn't he lose more wight after this? Those legs seriously look as though they are gonna snap. Brad in general looks like he needs a decent feed too.

    3434625727_bae09fb470.jpg
    Do you have any Therapeutic Use Exemptions?
    No. Never have.
    Never? What about the cortisone?
    Well, obviously there was the cortisone
  • Kléber
    Kléber Posts: 6,842
    The camera angle makes Wiggo look even thinner. Look again and his feet appear to be as long as his chest, his lower legs look longer than the distance from the ground to the top of his helmet.
  • a_n_t
    a_n_t Posts: 2,011
    Bhima wrote:

    But if you think yours are bad Ant, have a look at this chap:

    [Pic]
    !


    nowt wrong with them legs mate!
    Manchester wheelers

    PB's
    10m 20:21 2014
    25m 53:18 20:13
    50m 1:57:12 2013
    100m Yeah right.
  • freehub
    freehub Posts: 4,257
    Look at his arms though, I'd hate to have arms that thin looks like twigs.
  • rjh299
    rjh299 Posts: 721
    I've got big legs and always have, even before taking cycling more seriously. Think it must be mainly genes, but obviously training affects it. Size isn't everything. Guy from work has really prominent calve muscles but only because he's got stick thin legs.
  • The size of your muscles is also dependent on how tall you are (and the length of your limbs).

    Both examples here (The Schleck and Wiggins) are 6 foot plus.
    "A cyclist has nothing to lose but his chain"

    PTP Runner Up 2015
  • nolf
    nolf Posts: 1,287
    Tall and skinny here. Since I've started riding I've definitely got better muscle definition, but I'm not convinced they're bigger.

    But I like being tall and skinny :)
    "I hold it true, what'er befall;
    I feel it, when I sorrow most;
    'Tis better to have loved and lost;
    Than never to have loved at all."

    Alfred Tennyson
  • TommyEss
    TommyEss Posts: 1,855
    Chunky - even after losing a couple of stone, my legs are still huge - "Rugby players thighs" so I've been told. Though as I understand it, that kind of a compliment is a bit like when someone says "You've got doctors' handwriting" - which just means you've got a really scruffy indecipherable scrawl.....!
    Cannondale Synapse 105, Giant Defy 3, Giant Omnium, Giant Trance X2, EMC R1.0, Ridgeback Platinum, On One Il Pompino...
  • smithy1.0
    smithy1.0 Posts: 439
    Got big thighs here, lower legs/calves are smallish. Used to have skinnier legs until I started cycling. Bit of a pain sometimes, I find it hard to fit into some jeans etc. But I guess that's my engine. Upper body is fairly slight, but I can put on muscle there very easily too if I do any upper body work. I'm 5ft 9in, 145-150lb race weight.

    Has to do with your body type (mesomorph/ectomorph/endomorph) more than anything I believe.
  • Tonymufc
    Tonymufc Posts: 1,016
    akcc05 wrote:
    It's been bugging me for while now: Some of us cycle and have huge thighs and calves, but some of us also get super skinny legs, why is that? Is it down to the type of training and nutritions etc?

    Genetics my friend.
  • TommyEss
    TommyEss Posts: 1,855
    Tonymufc wrote:
    akcc05 wrote:
    It's been bugging me for while now: Some of us cycle and have huge thighs and calves, but some of us also get super skinny legs, why is that? Is it down to the type of training and nutritions etc?

    Genetics my friend.

    And pies....
    Cannondale Synapse 105, Giant Defy 3, Giant Omnium, Giant Trance X2, EMC R1.0, Ridgeback Platinum, On One Il Pompino...
  • Tonymufc
    Tonymufc Posts: 1,016
    TommyEss wrote:
    Tonymufc wrote:
    akcc05 wrote:
    It's been bugging me for while now: Some of us cycle and have huge thighs and calves, but some of us also get super skinny legs, why is that? Is it down to the type of training and nutritions etc?

    Genetics my friend.

    And pies....

    Oh yeah, sorry mate I forgot about the pies. :)
  • a_n_t
    a_n_t Posts: 2,011
    The size of your muscles is also dependent on how tall you are (and the length of your limbs).

    Both examples here (The Schleck and Wiggins) are 6 foot plus.


    im 6' 2", 70kg. reckon I could lose a few more pounds in the belly area!

    5732_116082811314_621311314_2699876_6396018_n.jpg
    Manchester wheelers

    PB's
    10m 20:21 2014
    25m 53:18 20:13
    50m 1:57:12 2013
    100m Yeah right.
  • ademort
    ademort Posts: 1,924
    If the size of legs had anything to do with cycling performance then i would probably be world champion. I am 5ft 8ins tall and 84Kgs. Not an ounce of fat and legs as big if not bigger than Chris Hoy. On the occasins that i have visited a gym people have always commented on the size of my legs. The only downside is very often i have to buy pants/jeans that are to big, and have them turned up at the leg and in at the waist to accomodate my thighs. According to my Dutch colleagues my legs are attributed to the climbing of big hills, which i find hilarious.Actually i have always had very big legs, even before taking up cycling at the age of 14. I am now 46 years old.
    Ademort
    ademort
    Chinarello, record and Mavic Cosmic Sl
    Gazelle Vuelta , veloce
    Giant Defy 4
    Mirage Columbus SL
    Batavus Ventura
  • isn't it more to do with the fast twitch v slow twitch fibres? Slow twitch fibres (marathon runners) give you skinny legs, fast twitch fibres (sprinters) bigger -[http://sportsmedicine.about.com/od/anatomyandphysiology/a/MuscleFiberType.htm]
    [/url]
  • Gav888
    Gav888 Posts: 946
    OMG Andy and Brad look SO skinny, how on earth do they develop so much power out of those twigs!! LOL
    Cycling never gets any easier, you just go faster - Greg LeMond
  • carrock
    carrock Posts: 1,103
    that photo of wiggins is photoshopped. deffo. no way he looked like that
  • Gav888
    Gav888 Posts: 946
    I dunno, if it was they did a very good job, plus they did another angle here... either covering their back to make it look real using 2 pictures, or it is real?

    http://autobus.cyclingnews.com/photos/2 ... IC20455761
    Cycling never gets any easier, you just go faster - Greg LeMond
  • hopper1
    hopper1 Posts: 4,389
    The photo taken from an awkward angle, but Wiggo's 'physique' is certainly not helped by the way the road dirt has stuck to his legs, creating false shadow.
    He is very lean, though... :roll:
    Start with a budget, finish with a mortgage!
  • holmeboy
    holmeboy Posts: 674
    Gav888 wrote:
    OMG Andy and Brad look SO skinny, how on earth do they develop so much power out of those twigs!! LOL

    The fact that there total weight would be about 4 stone?