My Mountain bike pics

AndyKing
AndyKing Posts: 29
edited August 2009 in MTB general
I decided to reupload my pictures because many of you said that they was to small or that you wasn't able to view them. So here you go =]


2ldc4de.jpg

^^ Stood up no handed

2zy8zvd.jpg
Black and white small table top

vhao8p.jpg

Approaching a berm

2j4sh6t.jpg

4ft drop off


34zk3ew.jpg

Downhill part

r94gah.jpg

About to jump

vpdlqu.jpg

Approaching a berm

vxndwk.jpg

Jump :)

11jugjb.jpg

Frost
«1

Comments

  • compo
    compo Posts: 1,370
    ok..... :roll:
  • Danlube
    Danlube Posts: 454
    We have already seen them once :wink:
    Kona Tanuki Deluxe
  • canada16
    canada16 Posts: 2,360
    Wow riding downhill with no hands :shock:
  • AndyKing
    AndyKing Posts: 29
    Danlube wrote:
    We have already seen them once :wink:

    Yeah I know but some people couldn't view them so I made them bigger
  • xtreem
    xtreem Posts: 2,965
    They are better now. :)
  • AndyKing
    AndyKing Posts: 29
    Xtreem wrote:
    They are better now. :)
    Yeah lol

    What you think?
  • xtreem
    xtreem Posts: 2,965
    AndyKing wrote:
    Xtreem wrote:
    They are better now. :)
    Yeah lol

    What you think?
    Well the first two are a bit blurry, those with the approaching berm it would be really nice
    if you can pull some nice angle in the berms, and well done if you did a 4ft drop. :o

    But I still think you should aquire a decent camera. :lol: :oops:
  • joshtp
    joshtp Posts: 3,966
    i dont like to be harsh, but they arnt that good :cry: , the one aproaching the berm is OK, but a better camera would realy help. Sorry!
    I like bikes and stuff
  • AndyKing
    AndyKing Posts: 29
    i dont like to be harsh, but they arnt that good :cry: , the one aproaching the berm is OK, but a better camera would realy help. Sorry!


    Whats wrong with the camera? It's fine. Its just we had to alter the shutter speed because of lack off sunlight to try and get the picture, and I had to upload them via tinypic to get them on forums and that may have blurred them a bit.
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    Use photobucket to upload. Add if you edit beforehand make sure the JPEG compression is on the best possible setting.
  • missmarple
    missmarple Posts: 1,980
    Whats wrong with the camera? It's fine. Its just we had to alter the shutter speed because of lack off sunlight to try and get the picture, and I had to upload them via tinypic to get them on forums and that may have blurred them a bit.

    They're ok-ish photos, what he means by suggesting a better camera is that you get a more capable camera. A small compact or mobile phone is really going to struggle in dim light - hence the reason you've had to adjust the shutter speed to suit. If you got a better camera you'd give yourself more options, you'd have a bigger lens and sensor which would allow more light in, thus making it much easier to take much better photos at a much higher quality.

    Simples. :wink:
  • need a wider pic of you on the drop... so we can actually see the drop? kinda looks like you're just rolling down a grassy verge!
  • AndyKing
    AndyKing Posts: 29
    missmarple wrote:
    Whats wrong with the camera? It's fine. Its just we had to alter the shutter speed because of lack off sunlight to try and get the picture, and I had to upload them via tinypic to get them on forums and that may have blurred them a bit.

    They're ok-ish photos, what he means by suggesting a better camera is that you get a more capable camera. A small compact or mobile phone is really going to struggle in dim light - hence the reason you've had to adjust the shutter speed to suit. If you got a better camera you'd give yourself more options, you'd have a bigger lens and sensor which would allow more light in, thus making it much easier to take much better photos at a much higher quality.

    Simples. :wink:


    Its not a compact or mobile phone its an actualy camera, used in proper photograpy, I explained the reasons. It cost about £240 but it was really dark. The first photo was taken with my crappy camera but you are still able to see what they are. Anyway, I don't want people to judge on camera quality..its a mountain bike forum not a photograpy forum correct?
  • AndyKing
    AndyKing Posts: 29
    bigbenj_08 wrote:
    need a wider pic of you on the drop... so we can actually see the drop? kinda looks like you're just rolling down a grassy verge!


    Well you can sorta see the drop..if you look closely enough. We gave up on that picture eventually though, if we move to far back theres to much sunlight and it reflects...and to close and its to dark so we had to keep changing shutter speed etc. So we left it as it was lol
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    I think most people inferred from your post it was about the photography itself.

    Your trails look fine but hard to see much.
  • AndyKing wrote:
    bigbenj_08 wrote:
    need a wider pic of you on the drop... so we can actually see the drop? kinda looks like you're just rolling down a grassy verge!


    Well you can sorta see the drop..if you look closely enough. We gave up on that picture eventually though, if we move to far back theres to much sunlight and it reflects...and to close and its to dark so we had to keep changing shutter speed etc. So we left it as it was lol

    Hense needing a bit of a better camera :wink:

    Photo's in this thread http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtop ... t=12643728 were taken on a cheap D-SLR.
  • I remember you, didnt you post some pics and videos not so long ago?
  • AndyKing
    AndyKing Posts: 29
    I remember you, didnt you post some pics and videos not so long ago?

    Erm, I posted these pics but a smaller version..no videos though
  • stev0
    stev0 Posts: 131
    is this thread a joke?? am i missing the sarcasism?
  • RealMan
    RealMan Posts: 2,166
    Sorry, but you have to remove that front light for photos! And there's something about the image of a full face helmet and a saddle bag that doesn't quite work.. :D

    #3 and #7 are the best, but ruined by that front light..
  • Doombrain
    Doombrain Posts: 360
    AndyKing wrote:


    Its not a compact or mobile phone its an actualy camera, used in proper photograpy, I explained the reasons. It cost about £240 but it was really dark. The first photo was taken with my crappy camera but you are still able to see what they are. Anyway, I don't want people to judge on camera quality..its a mountain bike forum not a photograpy forum correct?

    The photos are very poor, and you did ask what people thought of them and there are a lot of serious and talented riders in a forum like this, don't act bemused when you get peoples honest opinion, mate :)

    Other than that, the place looks like it could be fun and you seem to be enjoying it, ride on!

    Just to give you an idea of what an "actual camera, used in proper photography" is, this is one of mine used for location shoots, weddings, portrait work etc etc.

    3831778900_2595ec9642.jpg

    You're looking at around £4k for this setup and it's not even what I would consider an expensive camera. Expensive cameras start at around £30k, yes that's £30'000.
    LOL road riding.
  • lugsey2k5
    lugsey2k5 Posts: 960
    although a good camera would help you can still take decent quality pictures with cheap gear. this was taken on my 8mp camera phone:
    DSC00289.jpg
    assuming that works.
  • AndyKing
    AndyKing Posts: 29
    Well im not on about the camera quality anyway, I can't do anything about that, we don't have enough money to afford bills let alone a new camera...
  • AndyKing
    AndyKing Posts: 29
    I'm not removing the bag...ill probably get rid of the light as i need new ones but in the bag i have medical stuff and puncture kit so im not risking not having it their. Im sure you can understand that.
  • Mccraque
    Mccraque Posts: 819
    I think you chaps are being a little harsh! It's about getting out on the bike, enjoying it and if you want to get some photos then great.

    little tip for some good shots in lower light

    If you have an SLR, use a slightly longer exposure and a rear curtain sync - and pan with your subject. That way you'll get the motion blur and a fairly crisp image (but still with blurred wheels etc...gives a great effect.

    Or if you want everything crisp and frozen, just stick the flash on, and get as close to your subject as possible.

    don't use zoom if you can help it in low light....less light in the lens due to smaller aperture, therefore slacker shutter speed. = blurry.

    If your camera has a night mode...it will give you a longer exposure but mean you have to pan with your subject else background is ok and subject blurry!

    Anyway...a few very basic tips to help you on your way.
  • jairaj
    jairaj Posts: 3,009
    Sorry Andy I agree with some of the others, the photos aren't that good, not doing a lot for me.

    But I think your camera should be OK. A £240 camera can still produce good images. OK not professional quality images but still adequate images.

    Maybe invest in a photography book that will teach you how to use your camera better? Or maybe people who know more about photography can give you more tips on how to get better results next time.

    well done for getting out on your bike tho :)
  • Doombrain
    Doombrain Posts: 360
    That's a good point.

    Andy, what model is it? Maybe we can offer some settings for you to try out.
    LOL road riding.
  • Pete-C
    Pete-C Posts: 353
    anybody else getting flashbacks of "xcmtbkingy"? :lol:
    "Its all fun and games till someone gets hurt, then its hilarious"
    Pitch Comp
  • AndyKing
    AndyKing Posts: 29
    Doombrain wrote:
    That's a good point.

    Andy, what model is it? Maybe we can offer some settings for you to try out.

    Well I don't know, its my dads.
  • AndyKing
    AndyKing Posts: 29
    Doombrain wrote:
    That's a good point.

    Andy, what model is it? Maybe we can offer some settings for you to try out.

    Well I don't know, its my dads.