Cadence

Need help.
Been a keen cyclist for a while now and have decided to get some training in this year prior to really hitting the sportives in 2010.
As part of my training, myself and 3 mates did the 100mile Norwich Charity ride on Sunday which we completed in a time of 6hrs 23mins which i thought was quite good for my first 100.
However, one of my mates that was riding behind me mentioned the fact that i was pedalling twice as fast as him to maintain the same speed.
Am i doing something wrong?
I'm sure i've read somewhere that if cardiovascular fitness is to par, you can increase your cadence to ease the amount of work your legs have to do. If your fitness isn't quite there, you would ride using the bigger chain ring and you would get more 'bang for your buck' so to speak.
Am i speaking complete sh*t and am i riding wrong. Does it even matter. I finished the 100 miles and other than being a bit knackered, my legs were pretty ok. Is it simply a case of peoples different riding styles. I stayed on the lower chainring for the majority of the ride while my mate never came of his larger one.
Can someone please clear this up for me? Should i be using the larger Chainring :?
Been a keen cyclist for a while now and have decided to get some training in this year prior to really hitting the sportives in 2010.
As part of my training, myself and 3 mates did the 100mile Norwich Charity ride on Sunday which we completed in a time of 6hrs 23mins which i thought was quite good for my first 100.
However, one of my mates that was riding behind me mentioned the fact that i was pedalling twice as fast as him to maintain the same speed.
Am i doing something wrong?
I'm sure i've read somewhere that if cardiovascular fitness is to par, you can increase your cadence to ease the amount of work your legs have to do. If your fitness isn't quite there, you would ride using the bigger chain ring and you would get more 'bang for your buck' so to speak.
Am i speaking complete sh*t and am i riding wrong. Does it even matter. I finished the 100 miles and other than being a bit knackered, my legs were pretty ok. Is it simply a case of peoples different riding styles. I stayed on the lower chainring for the majority of the ride while my mate never came of his larger one.
Can someone please clear this up for me? Should i be using the larger Chainring :?
History will be kind to me for i intend to write it!
Fortune Favours the Bold!
Fortune Favours the Bold!
0
Posts
To help him to answer, it might be an idea if you tell us exactly how many bananas you are eating at the moment?
But I wouldn't worry, it's not so much of an issue.
PTP Runner Up 2015
there's your answer
Pretty much.
@ShockeSoShocked,
Nice to see another Jam fan around here :-)
http://www.53x12.com/do/show?page=article&id=15
http://www.53x12.com/do/show?page=article&id=27
http://www.53x12.com/do/show?page=article&id=36
If you sign up for his web/email/cheap training program then I suspect that most of the work is based on cadence
follow on
Of course I don't know if that's because I just kept trying to up the cadence because it was supposed to be good for me, and it might just be an overall fitness improvement that would have happened even if I had kept in the high gears.
I think it's a self fulfilling prophecy, if you like riding with a specific cadence (either high or low or whatever), you're more likely to ride at that cadence, which makes you better at that cadence, which makes you like riding at that cadence etc etc
People have had success at every level of the sport with all types of cadences, no one cadence style is better than the other.