Demographic research part 1

2»

Comments

  • Littigator wrote:
    Am female and have been posting here since it was C+, though not as frequently as some.

    'bout time you changed your name then

    :lol::lol::lol: I'm frickin hiLArious me!

    Ahhhh we've missed you Litts, and your razor-sharp wit... :D
  • sc999cs
    sc999cs Posts: 596
    Littigator wrote:
    Am female and have been posting here since it was C+, though not as frequently as some.

    'bout time you changed your name then

    :lol::lol::lol: I'm frickin hiLArious me!

    Ahhhh we've missed you Litts, and your razor-sharp wit... :D

    don't lie. :wink:
    Steve C
  • Littigator
    Littigator Posts: 1,262
    passout wrote:
    There's a flaw in the poll.

    How do we know that there aren't loads of female lurkers out there just reading the results?

    Yes, your sample is not representive. It's like asking all those who aren't here to raise their hands! People who don't contribute won't contribute to your poll. So your figures are skewed and therefore meaningless. Without a representative sample you cannot adopt a quantitative (statistical) approach like this. But you could use a qualitative approach and get opinions about 'why' people don't contribute - kind of like a focus group. You'd need less respondents but longer answers. Anyway, I guess it all depends on how bothered you are about having a valid methodology & at what level your research is at. At University or in Market Research companies a valid methodology is the only way to enable valid results. Hope that helps - good luck.

    wha' ? :? :shock:
    Roadie FCN: 3

    Fixed FCN: 6
  • passout
    passout Posts: 4,425
    I'll type slowly :lol: ......he is asking a certain group of people (those who cast votes or post) rather than a representative sample (those who use the forum). His results don't represent his 'target sample'. Simple......?
    'Happiness serves hardly any other purpose than to make unhappiness possible' Marcel Proust.
  • biondino
    biondino Posts: 5,990
    Actually passout I was assuming that even the most terrified lurker would feel able to click a radio button and vote. But perhaps you're right.
  • passout
    passout Posts: 4,425
    Yeah...in reality (not the world of stats) you are probably right but if you wanted to publish it or use it in an academic journal etc you'd have to be very sure and spend time clearly defining your sample. You'd have to be able to prove your assumption in other words. I'm probably taking this far too seriously (sorry).....but I spend all day doing this kind of thing.
    'Happiness serves hardly any other purpose than to make unhappiness possible' Marcel Proust.
  • Littigator wrote:
    Am female and have been posting here since it was C+, though not as frequently as some.

    'bout time you changed your name then

    :lol::lol::lol: I'm frickin hiLArious me!

    On other fora I am Notsototalnewbie

    I know, I need to think of something better but can't quite be arsed.
  • passout
    passout Posts: 4,425
    Post-Newbie?
    'Happiness serves hardly any other purpose than to make unhappiness possible' Marcel Proust.
  • Kaydee
    Kaydee Posts: 16
    biondino wrote:
    Actually passout I was assuming that even the most terrified lurker would feel able to click a radio button and vote. But perhaps you're right.

    Hi - you've prompted me to become a member and post after a couple of months lurking, as lurkers can't vote unless they're members. I felt the need to boost the female numbers :lol:

    I hadn't been on a bike for 36 years until July when my better half and I bought ourselves secondhand bikes to see how we got on with them. I started doing the 5 mile commute about a month ago, then last week we picked up our new bikes - his'n'hers Pashleys 'cause comfort is more important than speed at our age :wink: I've learned at lot from you, particularly about what I'm going to need to keep going through the winter, so thanks for that and keep up the good work!
  • passout
    passout Posts: 4,425
    Kaydee wrote:
    biondino wrote:
    Actually passout I was assuming that even the most terrified lurker would feel able to click a radio button and vote. But perhaps you're right.

    Hi - you've prompted me to become a member and post after a couple of months lurking, as lurkers can't vote unless they're members. I felt the need to boost the female numbers :lol:

    I hadn't been on a bike for 36 years until July when my better half and I bought ourselves secondhand bikes to see how we got on with them. I started doing the 5 mile commute about a month ago, then last week we picked up our new bikes - his'n'hers Pashleys 'cause comfort is more important than speed at our age :wink: I've learned at lot from you, particularly about what I'm going to need to keep going through the winter, so thanks for that and keep up the good work!

    That's nice!
    'Happiness serves hardly any other purpose than to make unhappiness possible' Marcel Proust.
  • moonio
    moonio Posts: 802
    Hi i am one of the 8 (so far) women on the forum, not been posting for the past week or so but I've nearly finished making my cycling skirt and dress!!!! :lol:
  • Jen J
    Jen J Posts: 1,054
    I'm a girl!

    And new.

    Yet seem to have racked up a lot of posts over just a couple of days... :roll:
    Commuting: Giant Bowery 08
    Winter Hack: Triandrun Vento 3
    Madone

    It's all about me...
  • biondino
    biondino Posts: 5,990
    Hi Kaydee! Glad I've led you astray :)

    Sometimes I feel baffled that roadie ponces like me and Jash ride incredibly light, featherweight bikes that actually float off if you don't tie them down, while people like Kaydee who want an easy ride choose half-ton jalopies like her Pashley. And yet we're the ones who fancy ourselves as the hardcore. :roll:
  • Gigatickle
    Gigatickle Posts: 2
    edited October 2008
    I post therefore I read therefore I lurk therefore I read therefore I post therefore I read therefore I lurk therefore I read therefore I post therefore I read therefore I lurk therefore I I read therefore I lurk therefore I read therefore I .........NEED.............HELP :twisted: :evil:
  • Jay dubbleU
    Jay dubbleU Posts: 3,159
    I post occasionally but mainly lurk because thanks to the Cycle2Work scheme and H******ds I still don't have a bike - even when I do no doubt Greg T and L_i_T will pour scorn as I'm a hybrid riding yokel :roll:
  • Kaydee
    Kaydee Posts: 16
    biondino wrote:
    Hi Kaydee! Glad I've led you astray :)

    Sometimes I feel baffled that roadie ponces like me and Jash ride incredibly light, featherweight bikes that actually float off if you don't tie them down, while people like Kaydee who want an easy ride choose half-ton jalopies like her Pashley. And yet we're the ones who fancy ourselves as the hardcore. :roll:

    LOL There's no accounting for taste is there! I've been lusting after a Pashley for ages. :D

    But seriously, think of it this way; if I had a light, fast bike my commute would take maybe 20 minutes each way instead of 35 and I would get only a fraction of the exercise time I'm getting now. I'm diabetic and overweight and I need as much exercise as I can get :oops: