Excessive Calorie Burn
jordanweeks
Posts: 13
Hi Folks,
I have a quick question regarding calories I burn during a cycle ride.
I recently read that it was normal to burn around 300 calories per hour on a bike ride.
However, I use two types of heart rate monitors, a polar f5 and also a garmin edge 305 (I dont use them at the same time)
My calories burnt during a ride are always in the region of 800 +/- per hour. This seems a little excessive..?!
Is this normal, or do HRM's have a tendancy to over estimate calories burnt?
STATS:
I am reasonably fit and think nothing of rides in the 50 mile region.
6' 3"
175lb
Male
I hope someone can help me...
Thanks
I have a quick question regarding calories I burn during a cycle ride.
I recently read that it was normal to burn around 300 calories per hour on a bike ride.
However, I use two types of heart rate monitors, a polar f5 and also a garmin edge 305 (I dont use them at the same time)
My calories burnt during a ride are always in the region of 800 +/- per hour. This seems a little excessive..?!
Is this normal, or do HRM's have a tendancy to over estimate calories burnt?
STATS:
I am reasonably fit and think nothing of rides in the 50 mile region.
6' 3"
175lb
Male
I hope someone can help me...
Thanks
0
Comments
-
IME with power meters and HRM's that measure calories, +/-800 is a better estimation.
It is dependent upon the intensity of the ride though.0 -
1000 calories per hour on a hilly ride is very common for me! six three as well and 13 stone.0
-
I read on the cyclingnews.com fitness Q&A page a whole ago that it was approx. 12 cal per hour per kg of body weight for a ride at about 16-18 mph. Obviously terrain is key here, as a ride of that speed on the flat would burn far fewer calories than a very hilly ride averaging the same speed. But it seems a good ballpark figure to me.Le Blaireau (1)0
-
The search engine is your friend.
Try a search for the recent thread using the words "garmin calorie" for a discussion on this.0 -
500-1000 kcal depending on speed & fitness. I manage 500 - 600 at best - almost 50, lardy girly. 1000 would be unusual I think!0
-
I cant see how just a HRM can accurately work out calorie burn.
1000 seems very high - and 500 low - so prob 750 would be not too far wide of the mark.0 -
cougie wrote:I cant see how just a HRM can accurately work out calorie burn.
You need a power meter or a lab gas analysis to measure calories with any reasonable accuracy.0