Off the Bike Training
Comments
-
Mike Willcox1 wrote:Ric_Stern/RST wrote:Mike Willcox1 wrote:Ric_Stern/RST wrote:Mike Willcox1 wrote:I wouldn't worry too much about what Ric says. He is so caught up in objective data he can't see the wood for the trees.
i.e. the bigger picture
Think what you like, but you're completely wrong.
ric
I will believe what I like and continue to train in the way I know works for me.
So be it. You can think what you like, along with the world being flat. It's up to you.
Everyone know the earth is flat. Come on now!
adding to that, have a word with Sir Isac Newton. we all know that weight/mass has nothing to do with climbing, gravity does't exist for cycdlistshttp://twitter.com/mgalex
www.ogmorevalleywheelers.co.uk
10TT 24:36 25TT: 57:59 50TT: 2:08:11, 100TT: 4:30:05 12hr 204.... unfinished business0 -
Mark Alexander wrote:[
adding to that, have a word with Sir Isac Newton. we all know that weight/mass has nothing to do with climbing, gravity does't exist for cycdlists
:?:
........and what about descending, absolute power, power/weight ratio etc. etc.........
The winner of a race is the one with the fastest time from start to finish which includes going up as well as sometimes going down, and sometimes going along on the flat. (in case you hadn't noticed)
What has just climbing go to do with the benefit of off the bike exercises?0 -
Ric, what we want to REALLY know is are you taking your SRM's with you??? Will Mrs Ric understand, if so then this coaching lark might be on to something...0