Forum Rules on deciding who is clean
Comments
-
Hold on;
In connection with his doping case from 2002, in June, the French State Council cleared him stating that he had been treated with a product containing cortisone, however, his doctor had not noted this in his medical record. (source: cyclingnews.com)
[tongue in cheek]Case dismissed![tongue in cheek]
Any others?___________________
Strava is not Zen.0 -
26) The "halo effect" - a rider is assumed to be clean if another rider, meeting the criteria already laid down, makes some statement to that effect. So if , for example, Thomas Voeckler states that Di Luca is clean, then its true.
27) The Room-mates rule - riders who room together can declare each other to be clean. "I spend 20 hours a day in X's company and have never seen him take anything" (Note that when X is caught trying to inject himself with 5 litres of cheetah blood using a Zefal HPX, the room-mate must change his statement to "I can't be keeping an eye on him all the time")
28 ) Active or ex-track racers do not take drugs.'This week I 'ave been mostly been climbing like Basso - Shirley Basso.'0 -
29) Never having been within 50 miles of St Moritz. Even when competing in a Grand Tour.0
-
30) Not have a gynaecologist as your 'training advisor' and being able to account for large currency transfers for undefined servicesMake mine an Italian, with Campagnolo on the side..0
-
31) Not being the spokesman of a protest during a Grand Tour stage complaining that the course is 'unsafe' whilst at the same time being quite happy to regularly inject drugs designed for chronic kidney disease patients into their body, despite having no illness or prescription.0
-
32) Not having to withdraw from a race in France because it passes through Italy. Or vice versa
33) Having an anti-doping tattoo. Or not. I'm not sure.
34) Contracting the same illnesses as the rest of us, not rare viruses. Twice.'This week I 'ave been mostly been climbing like Basso - Shirley Basso.'0 -
le patron wrote:31) Not being the spokesman of a protest during a Grand Tour stage complaining that the course is 'unsafe' whilst at the same time being quite happy to regularly inject drugs designed for chronic kidney disease patients into their body, despite having no illness or prescription.
in search for best excuses i read this thread. this is best comment. is so true i laugh into my testobix breakfast0 -
35) All riders from scandanavia are clean (except Danes)0
-
36) Never excite the fansContador is the Greatest0
-
0 - not have asthma0
-
69) have no emotionally blind acolytes on this forum - the mention of your name elicits a clear 'meh'"I get paid to make other people suffer on my wheel, how good is that"
--Jens Voight0 -
frenchfighter wrote:36) Never excite the fans
Arse.....0 -
Sorry, unless I have missed something the most obvious sign of being clean is
39. Wears white socks. Anyone who wears black socks is just trying to cover up blood spots.0 -
40. Having a sick mother in law or dog.0
-
"On a serious note: very few riders call dopers 'cheats'. Those who do repeatedly I tend to feel are clean (e.g. Evans)"
Agreed.
Jerome Pineau, Sylvain Chavannel. Not shy in calling a cheat a cheat. Ergo, clean.0 -
If they appear in FFs signature strip then they are either clean or only doping a little bit to make racing more enjoyable to watch. However, they are absolutely, definately, not drugs cheats0
-
calvjones wrote:25) (building on 3) Be a French registered and France-resident racer on a French team.
I genuinely can't think of any riders fulfilling this description who've had any doubt cast on them in the last decade - unless during the Cofidis scandal?
Can anyone enlighten me?
Michael Larpe of VC Roubaix this year, for EPO.0