Forum home Road cycling forum Road buying advice

Sizing querry

If you're bang on the cusp between two sizes which one is the generally advised to go for?

eg Canyon Endurance. I'm 177cm and the Small tops out at that, while the Medium starts at that.

Canyons own sizing advise (including inside leg) points me towards the Small.

Posts

  • pblakeneypblakeney Posts: 21,891
    Smaller will be marginally lighter.
    Either will fit with the correct component choices, stem length for example.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • seanoconnseanoconn Posts: 10,143
    JimD666 said:

    If you're bang on the cusp between two sizes which one is the generally advised to go for?

    eg Canyon Endurance. I'm 177cm and the Small tops out at that, while the Medium starts at that.

    Canyons own sizing advise (including inside leg) points me towards the Small.

    I’m at the very top end of a medium (6ft 89cm inside leg) Canyon Endurance and prefer the feel and adjustability of a smaller frame if there’s a choice. If you’re relatively slim and flexible, saddle height to bars shouldn’t be an issue. The only slight problem is I run my cleats quite far back and get a little toe overlap in slow tight turns because of the shorter wheel base.
    Pinno, מלך אידיוט וחרא מכונאי
  • First.AspectFirst.Aspect Posts: 11,463
    Normal advice is size down, but there's no right or wrong answer. I've done that on rental bikes and felt like I'm riding a circus clown bike.

    Hazard of mail ordering is that you are going to have to take an educated guess. Its going to depend how much drop you want from the seat to the bars, and how much reach or ett difference there is between the two sizes, among other things. You shouldn't assume they all scale together with one another.

    How do you measure up on the hypothetical ideal frame size for your height on other bikes? How does your current bikes measurement match the two sizes and which is closer?
  • rick_chaseyrick_chasey Posts: 65,328 Lives Here
    Extending the stem etc is easier than the other way around.

    Most pros are on tiny tiny frames, so it is doable.
  • First.AspectFirst.Aspect Posts: 11,463

    Extending the stem etc is easier than the other way around.

    Most pros are on tiny tiny frames, so it is doable.

    Absolutely, and judicious selection of the bars can also help, but both within reason. If you are looking at anything over 120mm to get the bars where you want them, perhaps the next size frame would have been better.
  • drhaggisdrhaggis Posts: 970
    Do you have a road bike to compare? Do you know your inseam or saddle height? That'd make things much easier.

    Manufacturers' size guides aren't all that great. I'm 176 cm, inseam of 82 cm, and my Giant Defy M feels a touch on the smaller side. At those numbers, Canyon does recommend an S. However, the stack of the Endurace is 1 cm less than the giant, and the effective reach will be another cm shorter, because the stem is 90 mm (vs 100 on the Giant). So the position will not be identical.

    It seem a medium Endurace and a 90 mm stem would more closely resemble a medium Defy. But what do I know...

    TL;DR: If you already have a bike, it's much easier for random strangers on the interenet to advise you.
  • JimD666JimD666 Posts: 1,208
    Thanks all. It wasn't the best worded question to be honest. Was more aiming at a general Larger/Smaller question than specific advise.

    The Canyon was used as an example as they've seem to of reduced UK prices, so was having a quick gander at them.

    Seems smaller is easier to adjust up than larger is to go down. Which was kind of what I was wanting to know.

    My Merlin is a Large, my Synapse is a Medium. One of these days I'll have to do a bike fit on them both because neither feel quite right. Though the Synapse is closest.
Sign In or Register to comment.