Rate the Giro 2022
Comments
-
Perhaps one reason why the GC battle was so muted
https://cyclingtips.com/2022/06/why-has-worldtour-racing-gotten-so-fast-an-investigation/0 -
I'll give it a 9...because it went through a little village called Ari for the first time ever!
(Yes, fireworks in the daytime. No, I have no idea why)
1 -
-
I'd give it a 0 if possible or a 1. Isn't that the point of a scoring system from 1-10?RichN95. said:The problem with these scores is people are calibrated differently. What would people score the worst GT they have seen. Some would only go as low as a five but others would go down to a one. I used to be the former, but now I'm more the latter
PTP Champion 2019, 2022 & 20230 -
-
I am going 6 . As for unpredictability no one had jai down to win . It was a very very hard race . Perhaps so hard it stunted the GC battle"If I was a 38 year old man, I definitely wouldn't be riding a bright yellow bike with Hello Kitty disc wheels, put it that way. What we're witnessing here is the world's most high profile mid-life crisis" Afx237vi Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:43 pm0
-
Looking back, I've rated it a bit better than 2021 and 2019, and not as good as 2020. Feels right, but I've enjoyed them all.
If you're judging them with the late 90s as a reference point, you're never going to rate them highly unless the race changes and isn’t so hard that in the gc it rewards staying power and energy management.0 -
I probably wouldn't go 1 because the worst I've seen isn't the worst I could imagine. Maybe a 2 or a 3.RichN95. said:The problem with these scores is people are calibrated differently. What would people score the worst GT they have seen. Some would only go as low as a five but others would go down to a one. I used to be the former, but now I'm more the latter
[Castle Donington Ladies FC - going up in '22]0 -
My calibration is TdF 98 = 0
Never seen a perfect 10Warning No formatter is installed for the format0 -
Just shows the subjectivity I suppose, as it was Pantani's riding in that Tour that really got me hooked on the sport. All of the rest faded into the background compared to his exciting attacking.No_Ta_Doctor said:My calibration is TdF 98 = 0
Never seen a perfect 100 -
Yeah 98 was when I really got hooked in on the Tour as I loved the way that Pantani raced
The 05 Giro was a perfect balance of attack vs defence, and the 2016 and 2018 Giri built to a crescendo in a better way than this year's.
The 03 Tour is probably the best one I can remember in the 25 years or so of watching them0 -
Better than ‘11?takethehighroad said:Yeah 98 was when I really got hooked in on the Tour as I loved the way that Pantani raced
The 05 Giro was a perfect balance of attack vs defence, and the 2016 and 2018 Giri built to a crescendo in a better way than this year's.
The 03 Tour is probably the best one I can remember in the 25 years or so of watching them0 -
I quite enjoyed 98 tdf despite the winner was the guy who didn't get arrested ... I would give it a 2 or 3No_Ta_Doctor said:My calibration is TdF 98 = 0
Never seen a perfect 10
"If I was a 38 year old man, I definitely wouldn't be riding a bright yellow bike with Hello Kitty disc wheels, put it that way. What we're witnessing here is the world's most high profile mid-life crisis" Afx237vi Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:43 pm0 -
Norick_chasey said:
Better than ‘11?takethehighroad said:Yeah 98 was when I really got hooked in on the Tour as I loved the way that Pantani raced
The 05 Giro was a perfect balance of attack vs defence, and the 2016 and 2018 Giri built to a crescendo in a better way than this year's.
The 03 Tour is probably the best one I can remember in the 25 years or so of watching them"If I was a 38 year old man, I definitely wouldn't be riding a bright yellow bike with Hello Kitty disc wheels, put it that way. What we're witnessing here is the world's most high profile mid-life crisis" Afx237vi Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:43 pm0 -
I don't really use 5 as average - there's no reason why it should be either, unless whoever makes the thread asks for that. For me it is "how much did I enjoy it" on a scale from 1-10, where 1 would be I hated it, 5 would be ambivalent, and 10 would be I loved every second of it. Given that I tend to prefer watching bike races to not watching bike races, most races will get over a 5.rick_chasey said:Yeah 5 is average
This is the same ranking system I use for beer on untappd as well...1 -
My main recollection of it now is that there was a lot of waiting for things to happen. Not really the sign of a cracking race, that.0
-
Not that our rankings really matter, but there are probably a number of stages in any GT that you do actively choose to watch something else (sprint stages perhaps), and we probably discount those and judge a race on the stages we do watch, even though that's probably a small proportion of the overall race.ddraver said:I concur,
Much below a 5 and I'll just be watching something else...0 -
If a "sprint" stage has a good break that needs chasing and then an exciting sprint, it's overdelivered. Either/or is par.
The stage when it was a lost cause and nobody could be bothered was an embarrassment but still had a decent sprint.0