I’m sure when I was a kid, people were scoring 30+ points. Rarely see anything above 20 these days. What’s going on there then? Are we all getting more stupid?
I think they must have reduced the time or the questions are longer. I watched a celebrity edition the other day (it amazes me how little celebs know, I don't expect much from reality 'stars' but presenters and reporters you would think would pick things up) and those who didn't pass all managed 8 questions in the allotted time for their specialist subjects.
Yeah first round I think you generally get 11 or 12 questions. General knowledge seems to be a few more - perhaps they realised the specialist subjects were often a bit tedious when the viewers can oy answer one or two.
Yeah first round I think you generally get 11 or 12 questions. General knowledge seems to be a few more - perhaps they realised the specialist subjects were often a bit tedious when the viewers can oy answer one or two.
Some of them are absurdly narrow topics too. So much so I’m surprised the hosts allow them.
Yeah first round I think you generally get 11 or 12 questions. General knowledge seems to be a few more - perhaps they realised the specialist subjects were often a bit tedious when the viewers can oy answer one or two.
Some of them are absurdly narrow topics too. So much so I’m surprised the hosts allow them.
The specialised subjects are clearly dumbed down for the celebs. They are certainly a lot less bright than normal contestants but then there's no reason why they wouldn't be. It's also noticeable on Celebrity Pointless.
Yeah first round I think you generally get 11 or 12 questions. General knowledge seems to be a few more - perhaps they realised the specialist subjects were often a bit tedious when the viewers can oy answer one or two.
Some of them are absurdly narrow topics too. So much so I’m surprised the hosts allow them.
To be fair, it doesn't matter how narrow the topic appears to be; you can still ask difficult questions. No subject is that narrow if you delve deeply enough. But for the celebs they don't.
I love this - which is why I was a bit surprised when he showed up on the alumni edition of University Challenge. He looked like he'd taken a wrong turn and ended up in the studio - like Guy Goma.
I love this - which is why I was a bit surprised when he showed up on the alumni edition of University Challenge. He looked like he'd taken a wrong turn and ended up in the studio - like Guy Goma.
I love this - which is why I was a bit surprised when he showed up on the alumni edition of University Challenge. He looked like he'd taken a wrong turn and ended up in the studio - like Guy Goma.
University Challenge is OK but after a while you realise the art and classical music questions are drawn from a fairly small pool of composers and artists - my knowledge of either subject is close to nil but I can still guess around 1 in 5 of those questions - if in doubt Beethoven or Matisse are a fair shout. If it's a British composer it's a 1 in 3 between Britten, Elgar or Vaughan Williams.
I mentioned this a little while ago, in 'trivial things that annoy you'.
The questions have become much more convoluted, and especially so in the specialist round. This means that they get less questions and also that the contestants have often lost the thread by the time they get to the point of the actual question.
The example i quoted then was ...
"Kenneth Williams grew up in xyz, he had a difficult relationship with his father, but got on very well with his mother, what was her maiden name?"
At one time it would have been "What was Kenneth Williams' mother's maiden name?", and in those days we had scores up in the 30s
I mentioned this a little while ago, in 'trivial things that annoy you'.
The questions have become much more convoluted, and especially so in the specialist round. This means that they get less questions and also that the contestants have often lost the thread by the time they get to the point of the actual question.
The example i quoted then was ...
"Kenneth Williams grew up in xyz, he had a difficult relationship with his father, but got on very well with his mother, what was her maiden name?"
At one time it would have been "What was Kenneth Williams' mother's maiden name?", and in those days we had scores up in the 30s
Yeah they're easier questions.
Same with uni-challenge. They usually give you a couple or a few stabs at answering it - if you know one bit of the question but not the answer you can usually be sensible and deduce.
I think some of the lower scores on Mastermind are down to the fact that they now don't seem allowed to interrupt and give the answer prior the the whole of the question being read out - the quicker you can get the answer, the more questions you will be asked and subsequently score higher - I guess this is the producers trying to "even it up" by ensuring everyone has the same number of questions asked in a round
I mentioned this a little while ago, in 'trivial things that annoy you'.
The questions have become much more convoluted, and especially so in the specialist round. This means that they get less questions and also that the contestants have often lost the thread by the time they get to the point of the actual question.
The example i quoted then was ...
"Kenneth Williams grew up in xyz, he had a difficult relationship with his father, but got on very well with his mother, what was her maiden name?"
At one time it would have been "What was Kenneth Williams' mother's maiden name?", and in those days we had scores up in the 30s
They should just accumulate the response time. Some topics could require more complex questions.
Posts
I got a load right on one person's specialist subject, Euro 2016.
Uni Challenge FTW.
Decent level of difficulty, good satisfaction level if you get it right, good range etc.
I mentioned this a little while ago, in 'trivial things that annoy you'.
The questions have become much more convoluted, and especially so in the specialist round. This means that they get less questions and also that the contestants have often lost the thread by the time they get to the point of the actual question.
The example i quoted then was ...
"Kenneth Williams grew up in xyz, he had a difficult relationship with his father, but got on very well with his mother, what was her maiden name?"
At one time it would have been "What was Kenneth Williams' mother's maiden name?", and in those days we had scores up in the 30s
The older I get, the better I was.
Same with uni-challenge. They usually give you a couple or a few stabs at answering it - if you know one bit of the question but not the answer you can usually be sensible and deduce.
Now, University Challenge i always enjoyed and think i could get a decent score most weeks.
Felt Z6 2012
Red Arthur Caygill steel frame
Tall....
www.seewildlife.co.uk
Felt Z6 2012
Red Arthur Caygill steel frame
Tall....
www.seewildlife.co.uk