Consumer Rights - Proving a bike part was faulty (Ultegra crank failure)

in Road general
Hi, I have a 3.5 year old bike that has done 8,600km from a well known online bike retailer. This week my Ultegra FC-6800 cranks failed and had to be replaced. Shimano offer a 2 year warranty on Ultegra stuff but have been known to replace ones older than 3 years. This issue is know to Shimano, e.g:
https://carlinthecyclist.com/epic-failure-ultegra-6800-11-speed-crank/
I have raised the issue with the retailer but they are refusing to help as they are older than 2 years (they have suggested I try direct with Madison, the UK distributor, whom I have no contract with). Under Consumer Law I can expect the cranks to be fit for purpose and of satisfactory quality for up to 6 years, however it is now up to me to prove that the part was faulty or had a known defect.
The opinion of an 'expert' is what I need and possibly I can get this from a LBS, but I guess they would be reluctant to do this for many reasons - perhaps someone would do it personally (I would be happy to pay).
Does anyone have any experience of proving a bike part was faulty? Or any other suggestions as to how to proceed? I appreciate a set of cranks is 'only' £150, but the principle of this is important to me.
Thanks
https://carlinthecyclist.com/epic-failure-ultegra-6800-11-speed-crank/
I have raised the issue with the retailer but they are refusing to help as they are older than 2 years (they have suggested I try direct with Madison, the UK distributor, whom I have no contract with). Under Consumer Law I can expect the cranks to be fit for purpose and of satisfactory quality for up to 6 years, however it is now up to me to prove that the part was faulty or had a known defect.
The opinion of an 'expert' is what I need and possibly I can get this from a LBS, but I guess they would be reluctant to do this for many reasons - perhaps someone would do it personally (I would be happy to pay).
Does anyone have any experience of proving a bike part was faulty? Or any other suggestions as to how to proceed? I appreciate a set of cranks is 'only' £150, but the principle of this is important to me.
Thanks
0
Posts
Looking at the web for reported failures doesn't really help because for every failure there is likely to be many thousands of happy consumers who have not experienced any failures. Very few people will ever jump onto a cycling forum to tell us all that there cranks are still performing well after 3.5 years and 8,600km of riding.
Many legal websites offer snippets of advice for free so worth having a Google at the likes of this:
https://www.daslaw.co.uk/blog/your-rights-and-options-if-you-buy-faulty-goods
Good luck but life is too short to pursue these principles IMHO.
BTW he was aware of the issue and confirmed that Shimano have replaced cranks beyond the 2 year warranty previously.
Navrig2, thanks for your input. I agree it is impossible to tell failure rates from the internet and Shimano sells thousands of these each year. I know what you mean about life being too short, but I feel sometimes it's worth the fight - especially if you can share it with others so that they can benefit from it.
I will keep you posted!
There was a similar post on Roadcc a month ago (I think it was) got into an argument with some guy who said the problem was caused by Turbo use. My bike had never been on a turbo!
Here he is on cyclechat (username 'racing roadkill') using his own posts on road.cc as evidence. You couldn't make it up - except he is. https://www.cyclechat.net/threads/turbo-trainer-hybrids.256356/
@davep1 Thanks for the road.cc post. So you got a replacement dealing directly with Madison? How did you make contact with them? They have a contact-us form that is very basic and only allows ~200 characters. I have messaged them but I wasn't hopeful.
They eventually said as a goodwill gesture they would replace the crankset. They sent it to my LBS who fitted it for me.