Nutters, Drones, Cranes and Chaos.

124»

Comments

  • Bungle73 wrote:
    Bungle73 wrote:
    awavey wrote:
    if it didnt seem bizarre enough the police are now suggesting there may not have been a drone at all :shock:

    That's a total twisting of the facts. All that has been said is that it is possible there was no drone - that is not the sane as saying there wasn't one.

    He added there was "always a possibility that there may not have been any genuine drone activity in the first place",

    The word may being operative in both the post and report

    Nope. It was claimed that police have suggested there there was no drone. They have suggested no such thing. All they have done is present the possible scenarios that they are looking at. Very clearly not the same thing.

    Awavey said:

    "if it didnt seem bizarre enough the police are now suggesting there may not have been a drone at all."

    The police said:

    "always a possibility that there may not have been any genuine drone activity in the first place",

    Now, you can argue about drone activity but it seems both post and report postulate the possibility of there being no drone, not that there WAS no drone.
    My blog: http://www.roubaixcycling.cc (kit reviews and other musings)
    https://twitter.com/roubaixcc
    Facebook? No. Just say no.
  • robert88
    robert88 Posts: 2,696
    Maybe they need to get Specsavers in?

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.standa ... html%3famp
  • Pross
    Pross Posts: 41,115
    Bungle73 wrote:
    Bungle73 wrote:
    awavey wrote:
    if it didnt seem bizarre enough the police are now suggesting there may not have been a drone at all :shock:

    That's a total twisting of the facts. All that has been said is that it is possible there was no drone - that is not the sane as saying there wasn't one.

    He added there was "always a possibility that there may not have been any genuine drone activity in the first place",

    The word may being operative in both the post and report

    Nope. It was claimed that police have suggested there there was no drone. They have suggested no such thing. All they have done is present the possible scenarios that they are looking at. Very clearly not the same thing.

    Someone needs reading glasses for Christmas.
  • briantrumpet
    briantrumpet Posts: 18,270
    Pross wrote:
    Bungle73 wrote:
    Bungle73 wrote:
    awavey wrote:
    if it didnt seem bizarre enough the police are now suggesting there may not have been a drone at all :shock:

    That's a total twisting of the facts. All that has been said is that it is possible there was no drone - that is not the sane as saying there wasn't one.

    He added there was "always a possibility that there may not have been any genuine drone activity in the first place",

    The word may being operative in both the post and report

    Nope. It was claimed that police have suggested there there was no drone. They have suggested no such thing. All they have done is present the possible scenarios that they are looking at. Very clearly not the same thing.

    Someone needs reading glasses for Christmas.
    Blimey. At least Trump got someone to do the 'comprehension' bit of Mattis's letter for him. Eventually.
  • orraloon
    orraloon Posts: 12,802
    Me-109 wrote:
    These are not the drones you are looking for [/Obi-wan]
    :)
  • I guess it's fortunate Muse have moved onto their Simulation Theory tour..
    My blog: http://www.roubaixcycling.cc (kit reviews and other musings)
    https://twitter.com/roubaixcc
    Facebook? No. Just say no.