Forum home Road cycling forum The bottom bracket

Re: The 'big' girls thread...

nolancenolance Posts: 79
edited March 2019 in The bottom bracket
What's happened to it??
«1

Posts

  • pinnopinno Posts: 42,789
    ...and to keep it international, 'Enhanced techniques for sheep shaggers'.
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • orraloonorraloon Posts: 8,984
    edited December 2018
    To start off our new all inclusive Big insert as appropriate Thread, I offer

    1y8et.jpg

    Please PM with your grounds for taking offence at this example of inclusivity in action.
  • bompingtonbompington Posts: 7,674
    orraloon wrote:
    insert as appropriate
    I'd rather not, thanks.
  • imposter2.0imposter2.0 Posts: 11,386
    This is like some sort of loop.

    Says the guy who's been banned six times, then immediately rejoins and is now on his seventh new user account. Now that's what I call a loop... :lol:
  • orraloon wrote:
    To start off our new all inclusive Big insert as appropriate Thread, I offer

    1y8et.jpg

    Please PM with your grounds for taking offence at this example of inclusivity in action.


    I find this offensive because it does not reflect the true demographics of modern cycling. It under represents ethnic groups and positively discriminates against other forms of floral tributes.
  • Vino'sGhostVino'sGhost Posts: 4,129
    I cannot believe this thread has been deleted.

    No doubt people have been offended because they think they should be or theyre protecting those who might be.

    TWUNTS
  • imposter2.0imposter2.0 Posts: 11,386
    I'm mainly offended by the black socks...
  • photonic69photonic69 Posts: 1,251
    orraloon wrote:
    To start off our new all inclusive Big insert as appropriate Thread, I offer

    1y8et.jpg

    Please PM with your grounds for taking offence at this example of inclusivity in action.

    The best way of a man getting into the ladies changing rooms if ever there was one! :lol:

    Genius!
  • orraloonorraloon Posts: 8,984
    Imposter wrote:
    I'm mainly offended by the black socks...
    Gadzooks sah, I take offence at your taking offence at black socks. This is anti BAME at its most corrosive.
  • imposter2.0imposter2.0 Posts: 11,386
    orraloon wrote:
    Imposter wrote:
    I'm mainly offended by the black socks...
    Gadzooks sah, I take offence at your taking offence at black socks. This is anti BAME at its most corrosive.

    You mean BAMCS..? (Black And Minority Coloured Socks) I just think that black socks are over-represented - don't accuse me of being some kind of white-sock-supremacist.. ;)
  • MatthewfalleMatthewfalle Posts: 17,380
    Pinno wrote:
    ...and to keep it international, 'Enhanced techniques for sheep shaggers'.

    where you be to now, see?
    Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am

    De Sisti wrote:
    This is one of the silliest threads I've come across. :lol:

    Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honour :D
    smithy21 wrote:

    He's right you know.
  • pinnopinno Posts: 42,789
    No see. Confused.
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • pblakeneypblakeney Posts: 16,837
    orraloon wrote:
    Imposter wrote:
    I'm mainly offended by the black socks...
    Gadzooks sah, I take offence at your taking offence at black socks. This is anti BAME at its most corrosive.
    I am mostly offended by people taking offence.
    I am therefore offended by myself. Gawd, this get confusing...
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • pblakeneypblakeney Posts: 16,837
    In other news, a comedian has cancelled a show after being told that he had to be careful to not upset anyone. Welcome to the grey new world. :evil: PS - There is an easy way to deal with trolls. Ignore them.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • imposter2.0imposter2.0 Posts: 11,386
    PBlakeney wrote:
    PS - There is an easy way to deal with trolls. Ignore them.

    ok - how about this for a new rule - from now on, nobody call him out on any thread where he talks bollox (ie most of them) - instead, just report the post using the '!' button and explain in the text box why you are reporting it. Maybe that's the way forward?
  • orraloon wrote:
    To start off our new all inclusive Big insert as appropriate Thread, I offer

    1y8et.jpg

    Please PM with your grounds for taking offence at this example of inclusivity in action.
    Is that this Nick guy you keep mentioning?
  • imposter2.0imposter2.0 Posts: 11,386
    Is that this Nick guy you keep mentioning?

    That can't be him, because he's never actually entered a race..
  • orraloonorraloon Posts: 8,984
    Imposter wrote:
    orraloon wrote:
    Imposter wrote:
    I'm mainly offended by the black socks...
    Gadzooks sah, I take offence at your taking offence at black socks. This is anti BAME at its most corrosive.

    You mean BAMCS..? (Black And Minority Coloured Socks) I just think that black socks are over-represented - don't accuse me of being some kind of white-sock-supremacist.. ;)
    Bzzt. Offence...Offence...Offence...

    Acceptable terminology is Socks Of Colour.
  • On the plus side the liar appears to have been eradicated. Again. But this time without trace, whatever that might mean.
  • orraloon wrote:
    To start off our new all inclusive Big insert as appropriate Thread, I offer

    1y8et.jpg

    Please PM with your grounds for taking offence at this example of inclusivity in action.
    Is that this Nick guy you keep mentioning?

    and the bird on the right has got great lung capacity.....shall I get my coat now?
  • Tyke999 wrote:
    orraloon wrote:
    To start off our new all inclusive Big insert as appropriate Thread, I offer

    1y8et.jpg

    Please PM with your grounds for taking offence at this example of inclusivity in action.
    Is that this Nick guy you keep mentioning?

    and the bird on the right has got great lung capacity.....shall I get my coat now?

    Is it acceptable to refer to transgender people as birds?
    I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles
  • :D:D:D
    orraloon wrote:
  • Can't believe this post is gone :-(
  • ballysmateballysmate Posts: 15,628
    Tyke999 wrote:
    orraloon wrote:
    To start off our new all inclusive Big insert as appropriate Thread, I offer

    1y8et.jpg

    Please PM with your grounds for taking offence at this example of inclusivity in action.
    Is that this Nick guy you keep mentioning?

    and the bird on the right has got great lung capacity.....shall I get my coat now?

    Is it acceptable to refer to transgender people as birds?

    Chicks with d1cks is recognised term, I believe.
    Mind you, I could be wrong in this new beige world that we now inhabit.
  • AberdeenAl wrote:
    Can't believe this post is gone :-(
    It was the only thing on here worth looking at.
  • big_harvbig_harv Posts: 512
    nolance wrote:
    AberdeenAl wrote:
    Can't believe this post is gone :-(
    It was the only thing on here worth looking at.

    Is that what you've been doing for 5 years (last posted before this week 2013).. :lol:
  • Tyke999 wrote:
    orraloon wrote:
    To start off our new all inclusive Big insert as appropriate Thread, I offer

    1y8et.jpg

    Please PM with your grounds for taking offence at this example of inclusivity in action.
    Is that this Nick guy you keep mentioning?

    and the bird on the right has got great lung capacity.....shall I get my coat now?
    I would say non-UCI approved fairings. I think there's a few who do approve though.
  • Another thread has gone, I was learning a lot about cranksets and semi compacts too.

    I.guess someone got offended by a motorbike on a cycling forum. It's just another two wheeled transport cars can knock you off. What's wrong with that?
  • thistle_thistle_ Posts: 5,605
    orraloon wrote:
    Acceptable terminology is Socks Of Colour.
    SOCs ? :D
Sign In or Register to comment.