Re: The 'big' girls thread...

nolance
nolance Posts: 79
edited March 2019 in The bottom bracket
What's happened to it??
«1

Comments

  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,496
    ...and to keep it international, 'Enhanced techniques for sheep shaggers'.
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • orraloon
    orraloon Posts: 13,269
    edited December 2018
    To start off our new all inclusive Big insert as appropriate Thread, I offer

    1y8et.jpg

    Please PM with your grounds for taking offence at this example of inclusivity in action.
  • bompington
    bompington Posts: 7,674
    orraloon wrote:
    insert as appropriate
    I'd rather not, thanks.
  • imposter2.0
    imposter2.0 Posts: 12,028
    Cyclopathic1 wrote:
    This is like some sort of loop.

    Says the guy who's been banned six times, then immediately rejoins and is now on his seventh new user account. Now that's what I call a loop... :lol:
  • tyke999
    tyke999 Posts: 50
    orraloon wrote:
    To start off our new all inclusive Big insert as appropriate Thread, I offer

    1y8et.jpg

    Please PM with your grounds for taking offence at this example of inclusivity in action.


    I find this offensive because it does not reflect the true demographics of modern cycling. It under represents ethnic groups and positively discriminates against other forms of floral tributes.
  • Vino'sGhost
    Vino'sGhost Posts: 4,129
    I cannot believe this thread has been deleted.

    No doubt people have been offended because they think they should be or theyre protecting those who might be.

    TWUNTS
  • imposter2.0
    imposter2.0 Posts: 12,028
    I'm mainly offended by the black socks...
  • photonic69
    photonic69 Posts: 2,962
    orraloon wrote:
    To start off our new all inclusive Big insert as appropriate Thread, I offer

    1y8et.jpg

    Please PM with your grounds for taking offence at this example of inclusivity in action.

    The best way of a man getting into the ladies changing rooms if ever there was one! :lol:

    Genius!


    Sometimes. Maybe. Possibly.

  • orraloon
    orraloon Posts: 13,269
    Imposter wrote:
    I'm mainly offended by the black socks...
    Gadzooks sah, I take offence at your taking offence at black socks. This is anti BAME at its most corrosive.
  • imposter2.0
    imposter2.0 Posts: 12,028
    orraloon wrote:
    Imposter wrote:
    I'm mainly offended by the black socks...
    Gadzooks sah, I take offence at your taking offence at black socks. This is anti BAME at its most corrosive.

    You mean BAMCS..? (Black And Minority Coloured Socks) I just think that black socks are over-represented - don't accuse me of being some kind of white-sock-supremacist.. ;)
  • Matthewfalle
    Matthewfalle Posts: 17,380
    Pinno wrote:
    ...and to keep it international, 'Enhanced techniques for sheep shaggers'.

    where you be to now, see?
    Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am

    De Sisti wrote:
    This is one of the silliest threads I've come across. :lol:

    Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honour :D
    smithy21 wrote:

    He's right you know.
  • pinno
    pinno Posts: 52,496
    No see. Confused.
    seanoconn - gruagach craic!
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,484
    orraloon wrote:
    Imposter wrote:
    I'm mainly offended by the black socks...
    Gadzooks sah, I take offence at your taking offence at black socks. This is anti BAME at its most corrosive.
    I am mostly offended by people taking offence.
    I am therefore offended by myself. Gawd, this get confusing...
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • pblakeney
    pblakeney Posts: 27,484
    In other news, a comedian has cancelled a show after being told that he had to be careful to not upset anyone. Welcome to the grey new world. :evil: PS - There is an easy way to deal with trolls. Ignore them.
    The above may be fact, or fiction, I may be serious, I may be jesting.
    I am not sure. You have no chance.
    Veronese68 wrote:
    PB is the most sensible person on here.
  • imposter2.0
    imposter2.0 Posts: 12,028
    PBlakeney wrote:
    PS - There is an easy way to deal with trolls. Ignore them.

    ok - how about this for a new rule - from now on, nobody call him out on any thread where he talks bollox (ie most of them) - instead, just report the post using the '!' button and explain in the text box why you are reporting it. Maybe that's the way forward?
  • tangled_metal
    tangled_metal Posts: 4,021
    orraloon wrote:
    To start off our new all inclusive Big insert as appropriate Thread, I offer

    1y8et.jpg

    Please PM with your grounds for taking offence at this example of inclusivity in action.
    Is that this Nick guy you keep mentioning?
  • imposter2.0
    imposter2.0 Posts: 12,028
    Tangled Metal wrote:
    Is that this Nick guy you keep mentioning?

    That can't be him, because he's never actually entered a race..
  • orraloon
    orraloon Posts: 13,269
    Imposter wrote:
    orraloon wrote:
    Imposter wrote:
    I'm mainly offended by the black socks...
    Gadzooks sah, I take offence at your taking offence at black socks. This is anti BAME at its most corrosive.

    You mean BAMCS..? (Black And Minority Coloured Socks) I just think that black socks are over-represented - don't accuse me of being some kind of white-sock-supremacist.. ;)
    Bzzt. Offence...Offence...Offence...

    Acceptable terminology is Socks Of Colour.
  • bondurant
    bondurant Posts: 858
    On the plus side the liar appears to have been eradicated. Again. But this time without trace, whatever that might mean.
  • tyke999
    tyke999 Posts: 50
    Tangled Metal wrote:
    orraloon wrote:
    To start off our new all inclusive Big insert as appropriate Thread, I offer

    1y8et.jpg

    Please PM with your grounds for taking offence at this example of inclusivity in action.
    Is that this Nick guy you keep mentioning?

    and the bird on the right has got great lung capacity.....shall I get my coat now?
  • sloppyschleckonds
    sloppyschleckonds Posts: 8,019
    Tyke999 wrote:
    Tangled Metal wrote:
    orraloon wrote:
    To start off our new all inclusive Big insert as appropriate Thread, I offer

    1y8et.jpg

    Please PM with your grounds for taking offence at this example of inclusivity in action.
    Is that this Nick guy you keep mentioning?

    and the bird on the right has got great lung capacity.....shall I get my coat now?

    Is it acceptable to refer to transgender people as birds?
    I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles
  • orraloon
    orraloon Posts: 13,269
    https://youtu.be/xaI6m2x6Nf4
  • tyke999
    tyke999 Posts: 50
    :D:D:D
    orraloon wrote:
    https://youtu.be/xaI6m2x6Nf4
  • aberdeenal
    aberdeenal Posts: 200
    Can't believe this post is gone :-(
  • ballysmate
    ballysmate Posts: 15,996
    SloppySchleckonds wrote:
    Tyke999 wrote:
    Tangled Metal wrote:
    orraloon wrote:
    To start off our new all inclusive Big insert as appropriate Thread, I offer

    1y8et.jpg

    Please PM with your grounds for taking offence at this example of inclusivity in action.
    Is that this Nick guy you keep mentioning?

    and the bird on the right has got great lung capacity.....shall I get my coat now?

    Is it acceptable to refer to transgender people as birds?

    Chicks with d1cks is recognised term, I believe.
    Mind you, I could be wrong in this new beige world that we now inhabit.
  • nolance
    nolance Posts: 79
    AberdeenAl wrote:
    Can't believe this post is gone :-(
    It was the only thing on here worth looking at.
  • big_harv
    big_harv Posts: 512
    nolance wrote:
    AberdeenAl wrote:
    Can't believe this post is gone :-(
    It was the only thing on here worth looking at.

    Is that what you've been doing for 5 years (last posted before this week 2013).. :lol:
  • tangled_metal
    tangled_metal Posts: 4,021
    Tyke999 wrote:
    Tangled Metal wrote:
    orraloon wrote:
    To start off our new all inclusive Big insert as appropriate Thread, I offer

    1y8et.jpg

    Please PM with your grounds for taking offence at this example of inclusivity in action.
    Is that this Nick guy you keep mentioning?

    and the bird on the right has got great lung capacity.....shall I get my coat now?
    I would say non-UCI approved fairings. I think there's a few who do approve though.
  • tangled_metal
    tangled_metal Posts: 4,021
    Another thread has gone, I was learning a lot about cranksets and semi compacts too.

    I.guess someone got offended by a motorbike on a cycling forum. It's just another two wheeled transport cars can knock you off. What's wrong with that?
  • thistle_
    thistle_ Posts: 7,218
    orraloon wrote:
    Acceptable terminology is Socks Of Colour.
    SOCs ? :D

Categories