Canyon Endurace AL(frame)- first hand experience?

Hi, first post here, I'm digging around the internets looking for info on the best AL road bikes around. I'm drawn to the Domane ALR, but they've discontinued the rim brake option- aka, 'progress'. I like the Emonda ALR, but to be honest, it's a bit too aggressive for me- yeah, sad I know. My dream bike is the CAAD12, but I just can't seem to contort myself to fit it... oh well, they say acceptance is important at least!
Anyway, my question in the title, does anyone have any quality experience with Canyon's Endurace AL bikes, rim brake versions? Their spec is just so good that they're impossible to ignore, but is it all at the expense of the frame? Is it a shite frame?
Anyway, my question in the title, does anyone have any quality experience with Canyon's Endurace AL bikes, rim brake versions? Their spec is just so good that they're impossible to ignore, but is it all at the expense of the frame? Is it a shite frame?
0
Posts
I'm not sure why they'd use the Domane name on their Domane Al, as there's no isospeed, but in terms of the quality of the aluminium, does the AL rate highly against other standard AL bikes, does anyone know?
It's now on permanent turbo duty as we've both got CF Enduraces based on that initial bike.
Just looking there at the Tiagra spec Endurace AL vs the similarly specced Domane Al, any thoughts on whether the Trek bike would be worth the extra hundred quid? Not even Tiagra brakes on the Trek bike...
Trek sell via retailers, so there is extra cost there to pay for those retailers. But conversely you get the in personal experience which a lot of people would put some value on.
I don't think you'd be unhappy with either. Not much difference between 105 and ultegra so far as I can tell nowadays either, I wouldn't make that the deciding factor.
Nice one, thanks for the thoughts...
Do you reckon one frame/bike is better than the other, though? Ironically, would the Ultegra Canyon be better by default due to the better components? Even though that shouldn't be the deciding factor? I guess I just don't know either way...
https://www.trekbikes.com/gb/en_GB/bike ... 5/p/23528/
and the Endurace AL 8.0:
https://www.canyon.com/en-gb/road/endur ... l-8-0.html
Just looking at the quoted weights, the trek is 9.43kg, the canyon is 8.1kg. That's a huge difference - much more than the difference between a 105 and ultegra groupset.
I mean, you shouldn't really buy on weights, but on the spec sheet, it's Canyon all day long.
Just be aware that you might have to wait a while for it to show up.....
That's not to say I only commute on it, as I did the Ride London 100 on it in sub 5hrs last year and it does club runs when the weather is less than perfect.
It's pretty upright (stack / reach ratio of around 1.6) but I've got long legs and a short body so that's what I need.
When I eventually get round to changing it, it will be for a Dolan Titanium ADX or a Kinesis Tripster ATR, both of which are around the same geometry but offer guard and and rack mounting. And the frames alone cost more than the entire Canyon including delivery.
All in, I find it difficult to knock.
Race - Fuji Norcom Straight
Sun - Cervelo R3
Winter / Commute - Dolan ADX
Asprilla, do you mind me asking what height you are and what frame size you went for? I'm just over 6 ft and come in in the L size according to Canyon, but I'm uncertain about not seeing it first. The Domane ALR is relatively local so I'll be able to check it out first, which is probably worth a few quid in itself.
Anyway, thanks for the info and taking the time...
The stack and reach of the two frames in almost identical (the Canyon is 8mm higher at the front) so take into account the number of spacers on the Domane and the stem angle when you try it.
The Canyon is slightly shorter at the back and steeper at the front so it will feel slightly less stable, but a bit more responsive. Can't say I've noticed mine being unstable though.
Race - Fuji Norcom Straight
Sun - Cervelo R3
Winter / Commute - Dolan ADX