Carbon rim brakes

ttd
ttd Posts: 17
edited October 2018 in Road general
After seeing Ciamillo Lekki8 brakes I started wondering why there are no other top-end carbon brakes options (except THM's Fibulas). Record/SR, Dura Ace, Red, etc. are all alu, not carbon. Why is that so? Is alu more reliable?

Comments

  • fenix
    fenix Posts: 5,437
    I'm more than happy with alloy brake calipers. If people wanted carbon brakes - there would be a bigger industry for it.

    And those brakes arent as sexy as Modolo Kronos.
  • super_davo
    super_davo Posts: 1,228
    I've got some carbon Tektros that came with my Boardman Pro.

    My take is there is no point. Brake parts are fairly intricate and you can machine alloys to those shapes far more easily. The difference in weight becomes tiny when you're comparing hollow alloy arms Vs carbon with metal inserts for pivots etc. Brakes are definitely something people care much more about functionality than weight. You can't really make much advantage of carbon weaving so it's stiff one way not so much another - brakes need to be stiff everywhere. And now with disk brakes there are other factors like heat dissipation etc.
  • joe_totale-2
    joe_totale-2 Posts: 1,333
    I get the whole weight weenie thing and admit to having done a bit myself. However, when it comes to brakes surely any sane person would care more about the performance than a 100g weight saving?

    Also with regards to the Ciamillo Lekki8 brakes, there's a big thread on WW about the dubious business practices of the guy who runs them with regards to previous products.
  • ryan_w-2
    ryan_w-2 Posts: 1,162
    The new THM brakes are f-ing awful. Both in build quality / design and actual braking performance.

    I have EE brakes but Dura Ace are still 100% the best you can buy from a performance perspective.
    Specialized Allez Sprint Disc --- Specialized S-Works SL7

    IG: RhinosWorkshop
  • Matthewfalle
    Matthewfalle Posts: 17,380
    super_davo wrote:
    I've got some carbon Tektros that came with my Boardman Pro.



    i've got two sets of those carbon tektros and one Boardman Pro and really like them both - the brakes work as well as ultegra, light, look cool, got them at a silly price in the sale.

    the boardman pro is and riciculously good bike for pennies as was the rrp back then
    Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am

    De Sisti wrote:
    This is one of the silliest threads I've come across. :lol:

    Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honour :D
    smithy21 wrote:

    He's right you know.
  • sungod
    sungod Posts: 17,371
    TTD wrote:
    After seeing Ciamillo Lekki8 brakes I started wondering why there are no other top-end carbon brakes options (except THM's Fibulas). Record/SR, Dura Ace, Red, etc. are all alu, not carbon. Why is that so? Is alu more reliable?
    limited market, most people will stick with the original brakes

    as above, ciamillo has reports that are really off-putting

    fibulas have had issues with the cf spring

    alloy ee brakes are light, work extremely well, waaaaaay better than sram red, and craig gives excellent support (even post-cc acquisition)
    my bike - faster than god's and twice as shiny
  • Ryan_W wrote:
    I have EE brakes but Dura Ace are still 100% the best you can buy from a performance perspective.

    Although if you ride Super Record they're 100% the best you can buy from a performance perspective.
  • trek_dan
    trek_dan Posts: 1,366
    super_davo wrote:
    I've got some carbon Tektros that came with my Boardman Pro.
    I could be wrong but I had some similar ones and I think they are carbon wrapped alloy, not full carbon like the OP is asking about.
  • fenix
    fenix Posts: 5,437
    I did think it'd be unusual to get carbon brakes so cheaply.
  • Matthewfalle
    Matthewfalle Posts: 17,380
    Just in case anyone cares, have just weighed the carbon Tektro vs 2017 Ultegra

    Ultegra 210g
    Tektro 190g

    Both weights inc pads and pad holders, nut, spacer and adjuster, so as you would fit to your bike.
    Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am

    De Sisti wrote:
    This is one of the silliest threads I've come across. :lol:

    Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honour :D
    smithy21 wrote:

    He's right you know.
  • Joe Totale wrote:
    However, when it comes to brakes surely any sane person would care more about the performance than a 100g weight saving?
    .

    Bit optimistic... the density of aluminium alloy is around 2.7 g/cm3... the density of carbon fibre composite is around 2.1 g/cm3... the only way to save 100 grams on something that weighs as little as brake calipers do is to redesign them to reduce the actual amount of material.
    Carbon fibre allows you to save a little, given it's stiffer and stronger than aluminium alloy, so you need less of it for equal performance, but I suspect you can't save much before you enter the "underengineered" territory... and of all parts that can be underengineered, brakes should probably be towards the bottom of the list.
    left the forum March 2023
  • joe_totale-2
    joe_totale-2 Posts: 1,333
    Joe Totale wrote:
    However, when it comes to brakes surely any sane person would care more about the performance than a 100g weight saving?
    .

    Bit optimistic... the density of aluminium alloy is around 2.7 g/cm3... the density of carbon fibre composite is around 2.1 g/cm3... the only way to save 100 grams on something that weighs as little as brake calipers do is to redesign them to reduce the actual amount of material.
    Carbon fibre allows you to save a little, given it's stiffer and stronger than aluminium alloy, so you need less of it for equal performance, but I suspect you can't save much before you enter the "underengineered" territory... and of all parts that can be underengineered, brakes should probably be towards the bottom of the list.

    The Ciamillo Lekki 8 brakes have been independently weighed as being 166g with pads:

    http://www.roadbikereview.com/reviews/c ... kes-review

    For comparison Dura Ace are 326g and Sram Red is 262g so it's actually a 160g saving from Dura Ace to the Ciamillo brakes. The article above claims there's good braking performance, however they sound a pain in the backside to set up.
  • cycleclinic
    cycleclinic Posts: 6,865
    very light weight brakes tend to have braking performance compromise except for EE. I'll stick the to the campagnolo brakes i have. They are not lacking so why change.
    http://www.thecycleclinic.co.uk -wheel building and other stuff.
  • First.Aspect
    First.Aspect Posts: 17,209
    I save a similar amount of weight by only filling my water bottles 80%. The bigger the bottle more weight you save.
  • I picked up some magnesium TRP979Eq brakes for very little money a while back. They neatly spilt the difference in weight between DA and Ciamillo/EE brakes after some minimal tuning, and you can pick them up cheaply if you're patient on eBay.
  • I save a similar amount of weight by only filling my water bottles 80%. The bigger the bottle more weight you save.

    Use a 5L bottle, save 1kg in weight! Winning! :lol:


    If some sexy carbon brake calipers were in the same performance and price range as Dura Ace, I'd probably buy a set. But then again I'm a bit of a sucker for that sort of stuff...