Danny Cipriani
Comments
-
Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
danny's too important to be filmed like everyone else in his opinion. or to be arrested. he's like well important.
#twatPostby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
Matthewfalle wrote:
but none of the assault?0 -
Interesting picture of the meal there in the paper. No drinks in shot. But almost everyone has their hand under the table?
Hiding the pints maybe ?
Didnt follow Stokes but he was found Innocent and the court had all of the evidence - so we have to go with what they said.
Ciprani does seem to get off lightly, but I think thats par for the course. YOu'd think he'd have learnt that he cant cope with the booze but apparently not. It does seem to be a far easier sport for a boozer to have a career in ?0 -
well given his past history with booze you'd thought he would have learnt his lesson by now. but maybe not
#notthesharpesttoolPostby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
Surrey Commuter wrote:Matthewfalle wrote:
but none of the assault?
which one? assault 1 or assault 2?
#bestcheckwiththecourtsPostby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
Surrey Commuter wrote:Matthewfalle wrote:
but none of the assault?
anyhow, mf was just wondering why you were so determined to the assaults.
two options:
1. you are a drunk brawl voyeur and get sexual satisfaction out of watching drunk idiots fight and wanted to see #cretin cipriani havue a rumble (and lose)
or
2. you are a #cretin cipriani apologist and wanted to protest his innoncence
#weirdPostby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
Matthewfalle wrote:Surrey Commuter wrote:Matthewfalle wrote:
but none of the assault?
anyhow, mf was just wondering why you were so determined to the assaults.
two options:
1. you are a drunk brawl voyeur and get sexual satisfaction out of watching drunk idiots fight and wanted to see #cretin cipriani havue a rumble (and lose)
or
2. you are a #cretin cipriani apologist and wanted to protest his innoncence
#weird
I just thought that if you had footage of big hard men pounding away at each other you should share it with the rest of the congregation
#denial0 -
Surrey Commuter wrote:Matthewfalle wrote:Surrey Commuter wrote:Matthewfalle wrote:
but none of the assault?
anyhow, mf was just wondering why you were so determined to the assaults.
two options:
1. you are a drunk brawl voyeur and get sexual satisfaction out of watching drunk idiots fight and wanted to see #cretin cipriani havue a rumble (and lose)
or
2. you are a #cretin cipriani apologist and wanted to protest his innoncence
#weird
I just thought that if you had footage of big hard men pounding away at each other you should share it with the rest of the congregation
#denial
big hard men pounding away at each other? that's fishfishfishfish and les' neck of the woods?
#pacifistPostby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
https://www.scribd.com/document/3700186 ... -to-Prison
For anyone claiming that Cipriani and Ben Stokes got off lightly because of who they are or because their wealth bought them a good defence they should read the above report which comes from Civitas.
Peter Cuthbertson has found that 70 per cent of prison sentences are imposed on criminals with at least seven previous convictions and 50 per cent are imposed on offenders with 15 or more previous crimes on their records.
Fewer than one in 12 prisoners are inside for a first offence - and where they are, it is usually a crime of extreme violence or a sex offence. An amazing 77 per cent of thefts do not result in prison time. The great majority of drug criminals in prison are there for supply, not for drug use.’
In other words, it's very difficult to get sent to prison these days.......whoever you are.0
