Cannondale supersix evo 2018 sizing advice

Perakemp

Hello

I am 193 cm with 90 cm inseam. I had issues with Cube agree GTC 2014 with this geometry-62 model:

It was small for me. I did try with longer stem but still it didnt felt good. So i sold it and decided to buy a new bike, and Cannondale supersix evo is the top option so far.

I cant figure what size should i go now with, since numbers on these links aren't matching. I guess 60 would be right choice i think?



Any help will be appreciated. Thanks

joey54321

Well, it looks like the difference in length (which is what is the metric which determines stem length) changes by 9mm between the two models so I'd say it'd likely be too short. 9mm isn't very much. Though the other thing that goes in to reach to the handlebars is the actual reach of the handlebars.

Perakemp

joey54321 wrote:

Well, it looks like the difference in length (which is what is the metric which determines stem length) changes by 9mm between the two models so I'd say it'd likely be too short. 9mm isn't very much. Though the other thing that goes in to reach to the handlebars is the actual reach of the handlebars.

If u compare last 2 pictures, data is wrong, diffrent numbers, thats why i cant figure it out...

Vino'sGhost

Perakemp wrote:

joey54321 wrote:

Well, it looks like the difference in length (which is what is the metric which determines stem length) changes by 9mm between the two models so I'd say it'd likely be too short. 9mm isn't very much. Though the other thing that goes in to reach to the handlebars is the actual reach of the handlebars.

If u compare last 2 pictures, data is wrong, diffrent numbers, thats why i cant figure it out...

cannondales view on this is that you must go and ride different sizes nad take the advice of the shop. You could always get a bike fit and given a list of frames and finishing kit that would work best for you.

joey54321

Perakemp wrote:

joey54321 wrote:

Well, it looks like the difference in length (which is what is the metric which determines stem length) changes by 9mm between the two models so I'd say it'd likely be too short. 9mm isn't very much. Though the other thing that goes in to reach to the handlebars is the actual reach of the handlebars.

If u compare last 2 pictures, data is wrong, diffrent numbers, thats why i cant figure it out...

Which bits of data are different? A quick glance looks pretty similar.

effillo

I am 6"2 and ride a 58cm.

singleton

I'm 6" (1.83m) with a and ride a 56.

Perakemp

joey54321 wrote:

Which bits of data are different? A quick glance looks pretty similar.

picture two -Seat tube on 63 model: 642

picture three - Seat tube on 63 model: 610

cannondales view on this is that you must go and ride different sizes nad take the advice of the shop. You could always get a bike fit and given a list of frames and finishing kit that would work best for you.

Option i have here is to order a model, leave deposit, wait 7 to 10 days and buy it, no test rides.

svetty

Stack and reach are the critical numbers. The 60 SS Evo is only marginally larger than the Cube for stack although a cm longer for reach.

joey54321

Perakemp wrote:

joey54321 wrote:

Which bits of data are different? A quick glance looks pretty similar.

picture two -Seat tube on 63 model: 642

picture three - Seat tube on 63 model: 610

The seat tube values are from different points on the bike, look at the diagrams.

mrb123

I'm same height as you. Once hired a 60 and it was spot on.

N0bodyOfTheGoat

Svetty wrote:

Stack and reach are the critical numbers. The 60 SS Evo is only marginally larger than the Cube for stack although a cm longer for reach.

+1