E-bikes, insurance proposal
02gf74
Posts: 1,171
Comments
-
Can kinda understand it tbh. What if, in a couple of years time, e bikes can do 50 mph. Where is the line drawn between a bike and a motorbike.0
-
danlightbulb wrote:Can kinda understand it tbh. What if, in a couple of years time, e bikes can do 50 mph. Where is the line drawn between a bike and a motorbike.
I don't own one nor will I be buying one anytime soon (never say never though), but the vehement anti ebike lobby need to be careful what they wish for. They might see this as something that will curtail ebike usage and safeguard "their" sport, but on roads and cycle paths a conventional bike is actually faster than an ebike; the additional weight and the fact pedal assist cuts out at 15.5mph means they are effectively speed limited. It is only a small leap for the regulators to realise this, at which point they might decide to require 3rd party insurance for all bikes, electrically assisted or not.Getting better slowly, one crash at a time!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Marin Hawk Hill 2 2018
Kinesis Tripster AT, SRAM Apex
Specialized Crossroads 20000 -
How will the regulation be enforced?
"Papers please!" :shock:
Can you imagine spot checks by the uniformed branch at Trail Centres up and down the country? It would cause chaos. But first they would have to enforce the road based e-bikes which is where I guess most of the e-bikes are located.
And as previously noted; why e-bikes? Road bikes are already much faster than any unmodified e-bike. The "e" runs out at 15.5 mph and most bikes (of any type) already go faster than that right now.
So what is the real concern? What has generated this need for legislation in this issue?0 -
steve_sordy wrote:What has generated this need for legislation in this issue?
It's only advisory from the EU Commission and would have to be passed as a law in each member state.0 -
steve_sordy wrote:The "e" runs out at 15.5 mph and most bikes (of any type) already go faster than that right now.
As above, this should be seen as a potential 'thin end of the wedge' to third arty liability for all bikes, as e-bikes over the 250w/25kph limits need insurance now to be ridden in a place to which the public have access (so includes trail centres) I think this is a pointless exercise and should be challenged by all cyclists.Currently riding a Whyte T130C, X0 drivetrain, Magura Trail brakes converted to mixed wheel size (homebuilt wheels) with 140mm Fox 34 Rhythm and RP23 suspension. 12.2Kg.0 -
danlightbulb wrote:Can kinda understand it tbh. What if, in a couple of years time, e bikes can do 50 mph. Where is the line drawn between a bike and a motorbike.
Someone has not done their research..
I'd not be surprised if the car lobby is behind this. E bikes must be a decent rival to cars for a lot of commuting journeys.0 -
cougie wrote:I'd not be surprised if the car lobby is behind this.Currently riding a Whyte T130C, X0 drivetrain, Magura Trail brakes converted to mixed wheel size (homebuilt wheels) with 140mm Fox 34 Rhythm and RP23 suspension. 12.2Kg.0