Part Worn Tyres

Need to get a few bits on my car done this month including the rear tyres. I normally get mid range, branded tyres when I'm buying my own (I've been spoiled for years having company cars where they have been included in the lease though). With the other bits that need doing on the car and several other one off expenses this month I'm looking to save on the tyres and was going to get budget tyres at around £55-£60 each. However, the place I'm going to also does part worns for around £35-£40 for branded tyres, all professionally checked and with a minimum of 5mm of tread (so roughly 50% of the original tread left at 25% or less of the original price). I've always been a bit wary of part worns but wondered whether anyone has any experience and whether a part worn quality tyre is a better option than a new budget tyre (especially given £20 per tyre saving).
0
Posts
Personally, I’d check how much new tyres are on blackcircles.com.
Also, budget tyres can be noisy so I’d consider part worn tyres IF they have life left in them.
As mentioned above, it's probably no different to buying a second hand car although it feels different when they've been removed. I'm going to find out more when the car goes in but from what they said on the phone there seems to be some standard they meet. My main concern is where they come from as I doubt many people replace tyres with 5mm tread remaining so presumably they are from written off vehicles.
My instinct is to opt for the new budget tyre. Oddly, the noise rating on their budget tyres was better than on the mid range branded tyres with the wet weather and economy rating being the same on them all.
But when coming to replacement I go for new tyres. Part worns with circa 5mm tread are only giving you 3mm life. Obviously any slight maladjustment of tracking or dry steering habits and you could soon be looking for more tyres.
The price I was quoted (and paid) was challenged by the bloke on the till, he thought them too cheap! About 30% of the new brand price.
And if the part-worns are older than 2010, don't even consider, whether there is enough tread on them or not.
In older tyres, after 6-10 years the rubber starts to get more rigid (effecting grip negatively and sometimes increasing noise) and the first cracks in the sidewall may start to appear (making the tyres liable to blow-outs).
I'd even wonder about tyres just 5-6 years old, since it may be more economical to buy new ones now rather than to replace the part-worns in at most 4 years time, maybe before then if the remaining tread still on them isn't generous.
Marin Nail Trail
Cotic Solaris
BTW when I attended the induction for my job with London Transport, in 1970, one of the stories we were told was that LT didn't own the tyres for its bus fleet! Apparently an early case of divestment, also all the tyres were re-moulds.
last set of part worn I had were from a set of wheels that the owner was replacing with alloys. The car was still on the ramps when I got there - a brand new mini which had been literally driven straight there from the dealer. Tyres had covered delivery mileage + about 3 more. Sometimes you just get lucky. I only went for the fronts to be replaced but wound up having all 4.
Never had any issues.
I would consider part-worn or remoulds for the rear. Good tip about checking their age though. Wife's car just had new rears for it's MOT and when he looked at the old ones the Kwik-Fit guy said he hadn't seen one of those for over 10 years. The sidewalls looked a bit scary when he showed me.
Think I'd always stick to a decent branded tyre for the front.
£108 for two new 215/15/R18s fitted isn’t bad.