Moon Rider documentary

2»

Comments

  • Matthewfalle
    Matthewfalle Posts: 17,380
    joe2008 wrote:
    Dinyull wrote:
    So, gist of this thread:

    The documentary is fine for kids, the OP's attitude isn't.

    Am I right?

    No.

    We're still no sure about the documentary as nobody who has commentated here has seen it.

    The OP's attitude is fine, as was the original question.

    Matthewfalle is being his usual obnoxious self.


    incorrect joe - MF is being his normal not putting up with rude responses to useful response to utterly, utterly bone websters question.

    as above - you reap what you sow.

    would you be happy with the complete failure of the 7Ps above being presented to your children?

    at my employment he'd still be getting screamed at for even thinking what he wanted to do. but i suppose that is the difference, hey.

    sorry if you find straight answers obnoxious, but hey, ask a question get a response. if you don't like straight talking.....
    Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am

    De Sisti wrote:
    This is one of the silliest threads I've come across. :lol:

    Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honour :D
    smithy21 wrote:

    He's right you know.
  • Is that the one with Clint Eastwood in it?
  • veronese68
    veronese68 Posts: 27,673
    Is that the one with Clint Eastwood in it?
    I think it's the one with Nicholas Cage riding a motorbike whilst on fire.
  • capt_slog
    capt_slog Posts: 3,965
    Reasonable enough question, but if there had been a bit more detail in the first post, he could have saved himself a lot of aggro (as well as £4.99). He didn't say he wasn't going to watch it, he was just asking to save himself the bother of spending £4.99 to find out that it wasn't suitable.

    People will soon stop posting anything on here because it's just met with nit-picking aggressive attitude, then what the F will we do all day?


    The older I get, the better I was.

  • Matthewfalle
    Matthewfalle Posts: 17,380
    there was no nit picking aggressive attitude until he decided to say that people were unemplyed whankerrs.

    the truth of the matter was then spelt out to him. he didn't like how the real world works.
    Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am

    De Sisti wrote:
    This is one of the silliest threads I've come across. :lol:

    Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honour :D
    smithy21 wrote:

    He's right you know.