Reason for massive difference in brake performance ?

2»

Comments

  • cld531c
    cld531c Posts: 517
    yertez wrote:
    Di2 brakes ?
    :)

    :D The bike costs £350! I have it too (as a dog trailer bike), its fine, the brakes are poo and the only thing that really let it down, but I suspect unless you throw a lot of money at it then they will always be pretty dire.
  • photonic69
    photonic69 Posts: 3,020
    You say it's your Winter/Commuter bike? Ridden in wet and greasy roads. Rims probably contaminated. Get one of these and give them a good clean with soap (washing up liquid) water. You'll notice a huge difference.

    https://www.amazon.co.uk/Garryson-Garry ... th=1&psc=1


    Sometimes. Maybe. Possibly.

  • Rolf F wrote:
    Some third party brakes are shocking. Some are also much better. The design, strength of the spring, cable pull ratio all effect a brakes ability.

    Unless over-strong, all the springs do is keep the pads away from the rims so I don't see how they can have much impact on braking effectiveness. And really, what difference does cable pull ratio make unless it gets extreme? How big a mechanical difference actually is there out there?

    If the spring is crap or fouled it can prevent the brakes returning and therefore leaving the pad in contact with the rim. Maybe it isn’t causing an issue here but on cheaper brakes they are an issue which what I was highlighting
  • Alex99
    Alex99 Posts: 1,407
    cld531c wrote:
    Or just make do with what you have!

    Come off it. I'm spending time in an internet forum thread on bike brakes.
  • davidof
    davidof Posts: 3,127
    yertez wrote:

    Any ideas what causes such a difference before I start randomly replacing bits ?

    it is an interesting question, even if it has been done to death already.

    I have bikes with the following setups

    Ultegra 6800
    Potenza
    105 5700
    Chorus
    Shimano Arabesque
    Weinmann Center Pulls

    --

    There was not a great difference between the 5700 and 6800 brakes, both are good with nice levers. 6800 are the most powerful in that list but Potenza is close with, I would say, slightly better modulation.

    The Ultegra is really a massive, stiff well designed caliper. I'm sure if you stuck one on your bike (on the front only) it would improve your braking assuming the cable pull on your levers is roughly compatible.

    Chorus, ok but it is from 1997 so has a dated lever design which requires a bit of force.

    The late 70s Arabesque is a single pull flexible caliper and even with modern brake blocks you lose a lot of power. The wheels and frame might not help despite being top of the range back in the day.

    The Weinmann center pulls with dia-compe levers are just pants, how people raced on them I don't know.
    BASI Nordic Ski Instructor
    Instagramme
  • ridgerider
    ridgerider Posts: 2,852
    The guy who puts my bikes together probably spends about 3 times longer to set up the brakes than the rear derailleur. He starts with a complete calliper disassembly, clean and re-assemble to all the right torques,, and then spends alot of time setting up the cable just right. There are a lot of variable involved with brakes.
    Half man, Half bike
  • Moonbiker
    Moonbiker Posts: 1,706
    No ones mention cable actuation/pull ratios?

    The calipers are suppose to be matched with the right compatible lvrs

    https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-mech ... atios.html

    Own brand calipers like btwin or non series long drop shimano brakes etc are made for the older shimano standards not the newer ones/etc probably
  • davidof
    davidof Posts: 3,127
    Moonbiker wrote:
    No ones mention cable actuation/pull ratios?

    Yes I did, in the post right above and I think it was mentioned further up too.
    BASI Nordic Ski Instructor
    Instagramme
  • Alex99
    Alex99 Posts: 1,407
    davidof wrote:
    Moonbiker wrote:
    No ones mention cable actuation/pull ratios?

    Yes I did, in the post right above and I think it was mentioned further up too.

    My pull ratio is about one snog to 100 f*&k offs.