saturday unexpected pineapple in nose cone
Comments
-
D. Under the rehabilitation of offenders act 1992, i'm not obliged to say.seanoconn - gruagach craic!0
-
Pinno wrote:D. Under the rehabilitation of offenders act 1992, i'm not obliged to say.
Ah yes caught with a sheep at the wrong end,thought so.0 -
It's Montalbano time!0
-
Garry H wrote:It's Montalbano time!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Just got in from black tie do and missed it. Gonna iPlayer it tomorrow.
Lots of norks out tonight but too much Oompa Loompa make up look and one pretentious red head bird in a red sequinned dress that looked very fit at first but just turned out to be pot bellied and fucking annoyingly yip like.
I looked shit hot, I must admit and TDV well was well lush pukka - best burd there.Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
Norks in Montalbano.
Ciao, for now, as they say in Llandow.0 -
Stevo 666 wrote:BelgianBeerGeek wrote:At least it's out of the way Stevo. When I had to endure my jury service I was told I would not have to do that again. That had better be true :evil:
I know people who have done it 2 or 3 times...
This. I think I've been done 3 times - once not selected, once dismissed due to concussion, once excused due to being mobilised.
Never really had the joy of being foreman of the the jury and shouting GUILTY AS FUUUUUUCCCCCCKKKKK YOU DIRTY SLAAAAAAAAG across the courtroom.Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
Garry H wrote:Norks in Montalbano.
Ciao
IPlayer deffo tomorrow then with a glass of vino rosso for me. Grazie.Postby team47b » Sun Jun 28, 2015 11:53 am
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honoursmithy21 wrote:
He's right you know.0 -
Matthewfalle wrote:Stevo 666 wrote:BelgianBeerGeek wrote:At least it's out of the way Stevo. When I had to endure my jury service I was told I would not have to do that again. That had better be true :evil:
I know people who have done it 2 or 3 times...
This. I think I've been done 3 times - once not selected, once dismissed due to concussion, once excused due to being mobilised.
Never really had the joy of being foreman of the the jury and shouting GUILTY AS FUUUUUUCCCCCCKKKKK YOU DIRTY SLAAAAAAAAG across the courtroom.
Did not make eye contact with the chav family of the accuser in the public gallery! Apparently one of them made the cut throat sign to the bloke we had just acquitted before waddling off in a right huff."I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0