What's the best power meter?

Here's some good research on power meter accuracy and precision.
Original paper
A good selection of brands tested, although only a decent number of Stages, SRM, Quarq and PowerTap.
Stages comes out worst on both precision and accuracy. Coupled with the reliability issues and then left - right issues I'm not sure how anyone could still recommend this unit.
The Power2Max which is a forum favorite (and my PM) isn't fantastic, but only two units were tested. I'd like to see more units tested before I stop recommending this unit. It is famously reliable too, although not as cheap now given the euro - £ exchange rate.
It's not clear the exact models from each brand which are tested. However, SRM, Quarq, and PowerTap come out very well. As does Verve Infocrank but with just three units.
You'd have to say relative to cost (presuming this tested their cheaper PM options) Quarq and Powertap would be very good recommendations with choice between the two probably depending on your set up (powertap wheel easier to swap between bike, but do you want the hub on your race wheel rims or training wheels?).
Original paper
A good selection of brands tested, although only a decent number of Stages, SRM, Quarq and PowerTap.
Stages comes out worst on both precision and accuracy. Coupled with the reliability issues and then left - right issues I'm not sure how anyone could still recommend this unit.
The Power2Max which is a forum favorite (and my PM) isn't fantastic, but only two units were tested. I'd like to see more units tested before I stop recommending this unit. It is famously reliable too, although not as cheap now given the euro - £ exchange rate.
It's not clear the exact models from each brand which are tested. However, SRM, Quarq, and PowerTap come out very well. As does Verve Infocrank but with just three units.
You'd have to say relative to cost (presuming this tested their cheaper PM options) Quarq and Powertap would be very good recommendations with choice between the two probably depending on your set up (powertap wheel easier to swap between bike, but do you want the hub on your race wheel rims or training wheels?).
0
Posts
This!
I agree with this ^^^ but then again I have a Stages. As long as the reading is consistent then that is what matters most, having done lots of structured training I'm confident of knowing when something might be wrong so for me personally the Stages works. Having said that, part of me just wants to ditch power altogether.
Cycling blog: https://harderfasterlonger.wordpress.com/
Blog: https://supermurphtt2015.wordpress.com/
TCTP: https://supermurph.wordpress.com/
I agree, but some people due to specifications on their bikes are forced to use multiple brands / models.
Or for convenience use two units from the same brand.
You may want to know your X Model PM on bike A isn't reading different to X Model PM on Bike B.
But yes, for the most part, precision is most important. But it seems there even stages falls down.
A like minded soul... same here... if it was not for Zwift...
( if I do go down the Eroica route, the last bleedin' thing I will have is a damn PM.)
Or how about this, for the same money get one that gives you the right numbers, time and time again?
i've got 3 quarqs now, and I'm happy with them as a vendor, and I'm confident in the numbers in every sense.
Surely they're under-reading looking at your latest stats?...
IG: RhinosWorkshop
Unless you are Pro and every accurate Watt counts then I don't see the worry? Too many Faux Pro's.
No attempt has been made to review the recording methods used, or the riders taking part.
It's well known that Stages is left hand reading only (was - they're now selling the two sided version) - which has fundimental issues with leg imbalance. If I wanted to skew a power reading on Stages then I'd ride with one leg - simple. Even if I didn't want to skew it I'd have to make sure my perceived effort was balanced - not something you generally think about whilst riding.
Looking at the article review - it's quite easy to look at the "Worst performer" stages - and chalk the entire discrepancy up to Rider leg imbalance - yet the review hasn't mentioned that posibility - is it mentioned in the original paper - I'd hope so.
Personally - I'd go back to DCRainmaker's review
https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2016/09/pow ... ition.html
He's done his testing with between 4 and 7 power meters recording simultaneously onto a Wasp unit.
I think this quote just about sums it all up:
Amateur hour over here.
Get back to me when you do it with precision calibrated instruments and precision machined testing rigs.
"To do this, riders were placed on a treadmill set to a one per cent incline – but they were facing downhill (see figure one). A cord was attached to the seatpost, which in turn was linked to a weight to hold the rider in the same position on the treadmill.
A second weight was added to the cord which, if the rider didn’t pedal, would pull them backwards up the slope. Because the mass of the additional weight was known, the researchers could then calculate power output, while also accounting for the loss of power through the drivetrain.
This setup allowed the researchers to compare the average power as recorded on the various power meters to the true value. Each power meter was tested a number of times with a number of different riders."
I also wonder how many people know how to use it properly. It's not just having accurate numbers but knowing what they actually mean. If you have 3 and see very little difference that tells me you are looking beyond the basic raw figures and are being a bit more analytical which is what power meters are designed for.
Despite what I said, your point is valid, however at the time of purchase the money wasn't the same and if you can only afford one and need to swap it between bikes then the options were limited further.
Cycling blog: https://harderfasterlonger.wordpress.com/
Blog: https://supermurphtt2015.wordpress.com/
TCTP: https://supermurph.wordpress.com/
Before I could afford to have 3 (about 5 years ago) I swapped it between bikes, it took about 90 seconds.
I prefer to have accurate numbers, allows me to compare to my peers in certain events, ride on different bikes and see where the gap between my TT position and road for example is (impossible with two powermeters that have hugely different readings), also pretty sure having the wrong numbers would give you a totally wrong CdA figure for a TT position. Which would make sense as Aerocoach will give anyone with a stages a powertap to borrow for the session to make sure that the numbers stack up.
It isn't about being a faux pro, its about buying a product that works, none of them are £50, so why accept one that is wrong, there is no point.
maybe the original paper is being misrepresented, but it's paywalled, and based on what i've seen so far, they'd have to pay me to look at it
2020 Voodoo Marasa
2017 Cube Attain GTC Pro Disc 2016
2016 Voodoo Wazoo