Stupid mountain bike wheel sizes
secretsam
Posts: 5,120
Went to buy new tubes for SecretSam jnr bike, half a dozen wheel sizes. 26"? 27.5" (which is also 650b)? 29er (aka 700c aka 29")?
What a farkin' moronic mess. Someone explain to me the logic of having THREE marginally different wheel sizes.
What a farkin' moronic mess. Someone explain to me the logic of having THREE marginally different wheel sizes.
It's just a hill. Get over it.
0
Comments
-
26 is twitchy and good for complex terrain
29 is better for rolling over everthing and generally quicker on trails
27.5 is the bastard love child of the above, is probably sterile and just plain weird.
Also - 29er bikes look stupid when you stop 'cos you can't stay on the saddle and look like a short-arse.Chunky Cyclists need your love too! :-)
2009 Specialized Tricross Sport
2011 Trek Madone 4.5
2012 Felt F65X
Proud CX Pervert and quiet roadie. 12 mile commuter0 -
Kieran_Burns wrote:26 is twitchy and good for complex terrain
29 is better for rolling over everthing and generally quicker on trails
27.5 is the bastard love child of the above, is probably sterile and just plain weird.
Also - 29er bikes look stupid when you stop 'cos you can't stay on the saddle and look like a short-arse.
Track stand like a boss?FCN 9 || FCN 50 -
Kieran_Burns wrote:Also - 29er bikes look stupid when you stop 'cos you can't stay on the saddle and look like a short-arse.0
-
It wouldn't be a problem if each size wasn't then called in other 3 ways... and each size actually meant something... 29 inch what? 700 c what? They are both in fact 622, which is the diameter at the beadleft the forum March 20230
-
I stuck 26" inner tubes into my 27.5/650b wheels, reasoning that they'll expand to fit. Not died yet.Location: ciderspace0
-
it doesn't impact tube sizes but they also have 'boost' or 'plus/+' wheel sizes now which are the same circumference but with wider hubs.
It's a total minefield and all driven by sales generation.FCN = 40 -
lets not forget axle standards whilst we are on the wheels topic.
9mm? 15? 20? 12? maxle ? q-loc ? syntace x-12? even my CX bike hasn't escaped the madness with it's 10mm offering..0 -
i struggled to even find cheap 26" disc wheels, is that market now dead?Rule #5 // Harden The Feck Up.
Rule #9 // If you are out riding in bad weather, it means you are a badass. Period.
Rule #12 // The correct number of bikes to own is n+1.
Rule #42 // A bike race shall never be preceded with a swim and/or followed by a run.0 -
reformedfatty wrote:lets not forget axle standards whilst we are on the wheels topic.
9mm? 15? 20? 12? maxle ? q-loc ? syntace x-12? even my CX bike hasn't escaped the madness with it's 10mm offering..0 -
It sucks .... I really like 26" .. they get to speed quick and are nimble, but I am sure my MTBs now have a shelf life that they didn't used to
my Klein still uses "rim" brakes, wont be long before I cant get rims or hubs that fit that0 -
These wheel sizes on MTB's have been around for a long time, back in 1986 I went out on rides from Wendover where we had people with 24", 26", 650b's and 29" wheels.
Geoff Apps built bikes with all these wheel sizes except 26" back in the 80's, Geoff has the title of the Grandfather of British Mountain Bikeing.Now where's that "Get Out of Crash Free Card"0 -
fat daddy wrote:my Klein still uses "rim" brakes, wont be long before I cant get rims or hubs that fit that0
-
robertpb wrote:These wheel sizes on MTB's have been around for a long time, back in 1986 I went out on rides from Wendover where we had people with 24", 26", 650b's and 29" wheels.
Geoff Apps built bikes with all these wheel sizes except 26" back in the 80's, Geoff has the title of the Grandfather of British Mountain Bikeing.
Back in 1986, road bikes had 700c and 27" rims, but that mess was soon resolved, 700c won. Road, cross, touring (mostly)...700c.
Bl00dy knobblists need to make up their minds. Different wheel sizes for different uses, I mean, really? There's only a few mm between them, surely?
It's just a hill. Get over it.0 -
SecretSam wrote:robertpb wrote:These wheel sizes on MTB's have been around for a long time, back in 1986 I went out on rides from Wendover where we had people with 24", 26", 650b's and 29" wheels.
Geoff Apps built bikes with all these wheel sizes except 26" back in the 80's, Geoff has the title of the Grandfather of British Mountain Bikeing.
Back in 1986, road bikes had 700c and 27" rims, but that mess was soon resolved, 700c won. Road, cross, touring (mostly)...700c.
Bl00dy knobblists need to make up their minds. Different wheel sizes for different uses, I mean, really? There's only a few mm between them, surely?
26 and 27.5 yes not much, but 29ers are a fair bit bigger, though has to be said the 3 sizes have been out for 5 years or so now, I bought a 29er 4 years ago.0 -
There's also 650c, which is a smaller road wheel. I mistakenly bought a set for my daughter's Islabike, only to discover they're not the same as the 26" it came with. They're close, within the range of adjustment of the brakes, but definitely not the same (and I'm not going to adjust two sets of canti brakes every time I switch it between CX and Road...)Pannier, 120rpm.0
-
MTB-Idle wrote:
It's a total minefield and all driven by sales generation.
This. Just like the road 'Upgrade' to 11sp.
Since I started cycling the innovations that stand out as a real step forward for the end user are decent puncture resistant tyres, brifters on road bikes, clipless pedals and disks on MTB.
Most of the rest is stuff I could happily live without.0