Taking FTP from non-FTP tests (eg races)
cgfw201
Posts: 680
Think I know what the answer is, but just checking.
I've done a load of FTP tests in the last few years, usually showing an increase on whatever platform I'm doing it on.
However since I started racing, both on Zwift and IRL, I've been smashing my previous best watts and max HR.
Is there any reason not to take what Garmin(/Training Peaks) interprets to be my new FTP based on race data from a 30/60m race effort?
Zwift races have a more tt-like even power distribution, whilst crits have more peaks and troughs, but both are spitting out FTP numbers a fair bit higher than what I get when I do a 20m test indoors.
Or should FTP only be calculated from the set 20m test setup?
Cheers
(Edit. NB I do realise that now I know I have more watts than I thought I did, I could probably to the FTP test and get a nearer number to what I get in races, but suspect the lack of adrenalin and competition would still see it come up lower.)
I've done a load of FTP tests in the last few years, usually showing an increase on whatever platform I'm doing it on.
However since I started racing, both on Zwift and IRL, I've been smashing my previous best watts and max HR.
Is there any reason not to take what Garmin(/Training Peaks) interprets to be my new FTP based on race data from a 30/60m race effort?
Zwift races have a more tt-like even power distribution, whilst crits have more peaks and troughs, but both are spitting out FTP numbers a fair bit higher than what I get when I do a 20m test indoors.
Or should FTP only be calculated from the set 20m test setup?
Cheers
(Edit. NB I do realise that now I know I have more watts than I thought I did, I could probably to the FTP test and get a nearer number to what I get in races, but suspect the lack of adrenalin and competition would still see it come up lower.)
0
Comments
-
FTP is the max power you can hold for an hour - the 20 minute test is generally used because sitting on a dumb turbo for an hour at max effort is banned by the Geneva Convention. If the Zwift effort is fairly even, I'd take that as your new FTP.0
-
Have you noticed higher power numbers on the road compared to the trainer? I think that can be the case for many people. Something also to consider..0
-
An event like a 10 mile TT (~20min) and a 25 mile TT (~1 hour) might be appropriate, but for a crits and RRs and the constant surging/lulling of both i'd personally not use them."A cyclist has nothing to lose but his chain"
PTP Runner Up 20150 -
ShockedSoShocked wrote:An event like a 10 mile TT (~20min) and a 25 mile TT (~1 hour) might be appropriate, but for a crits and RRs and the constant surging/lulling of both i'd personally not use them.
At the end of crits where I've attacked like a loon for an hour to the point of exhaustion I've found normalised power to be within a couple of watts of my FTP based on 1 hour tests... although, if I'm still not sure whether I'd use them instead of a proper test.0 -
I personally wouldnt use normalised power from a race to set zones even though during my last crit it happened to match my conventional FTP result.
I only tried to do an indoor FTP test a few times and it was nearly 20 watts lower than outside. I had two sets of zones just in case I was ever on the turbo, which wasnt often to be fair.0