New Cannondale?

I lost the cycling habit a few years back and I'm desperate to find it again. Knowing myself as I do, a new bike is a good way to do it. I've got a 2010 trek alpha 2.3 105 that has quite a few miles on it in the hallway, and I think it's time for an upgrade. Much of my riding will be a 12-mile commute, with shortish (20mi) weekend spins.
So bikes are moving on and I'm weighing up the options at around £1500. I loved my CAAD10 and I'm drawn back to cannondale.
caad12 105 disc?
Caad12 ultegra non-disc
Super six Evo 105?
Synapse 105?
I'm 40; 5'10; and too heavy (120kg - hence the urgency to cycle!). What should I be trying out and looking for? I like the idea of disc brakes but is the non-through axles on the card a real issue? And the weight?
So bikes are moving on and I'm weighing up the options at around £1500. I loved my CAAD10 and I'm drawn back to cannondale.
caad12 105 disc?
Caad12 ultegra non-disc
Super six Evo 105?
Synapse 105?
I'm 40; 5'10; and too heavy (120kg - hence the urgency to cycle!). What should I be trying out and looking for? I like the idea of disc brakes but is the non-through axles on the card a real issue? And the weight?
0
Posts
You could spend a fortune and save 3-4kg on a CAAD12 frame and light weight bits, which I have done on my summer project. Myself, I am going to lose the weight off my frame and bits ..... mostly my tummy.
The wheels are also very heavy. Saying that its a very comfortable and fairly quick bike.
I changed the brakes to Juin tech r1 with a 160 on the rear as well as the front.
Yes it is
And
What would you recommend instead - a non disc CAAD, a super six, or a disc bike from another manufacturer?
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honour
I don't believe there's a problem with qr vs thru axle tbh
Brilliant, thank you, that's reassuring and encouraging in equal measure. So as an all rounder and regular (4 season) commuter, you think it's a solid option - better for example than the tarmac comp (seeing as you're a Tarmac owner)?
So, still looking for opinions on this!
I love the evo and it just wants to make you go fast, but for a longer day in the saddle I go for the synapse every time. Granted, I get lower back pain which certainly influences the comfort factor but even though the synapse has a more relaxed geometry it is no slouch and there is no tangible difference in speed over a longer ride between it and evo. I have also raced the synapse and again haven't been disadvantaged.
Basically if I had to chose one bike (with my head) it would be the synapse due to the combination of the comfort and speed.
I am awaiting delivery of a CAAD12 Ultegra so I will hopefully be able to report back on that.
If you need motivation to get out and ride then another way to look at it is to get riding on what you have and set a target weight of 100kg. When you reach that you could buy a new bike with racier looking wheels, etc, so maybe a good target for April next year, but only if you hit the mark. That should keep you going in mid January :-)
Indeed it is heavy, which is part of the reason to get back out on the bike; I've not had problems with wheels for a while though; last time was when I was significantly lighter on my old CAAD9, when spokes kept pinging and I eventually had the wheel rebuilt.
After realising that I can legitimately put the bike through my own business and save the corporation tax, and finding a good unpublished deal on a current year bike, I've just put down for a Synapse 105 disc - which comes with 28mm tyres as standard. I'll give them a go and see where I end up.
Tried the CAAD12, which was great - really lively - but the comfort and slightly more go-anywhere nature of the synapse had me sold, plus it was available for a similar price.
Thanks for your help everyone!