Which handlebar width for my shoulders
hububalli
Posts: 26
Hi,
Just had my "bony protrusions" on my shoulders measured which were surprisingly narrow at 35.5cm. We measured it three times, relaxed position, hands by my sides.
Would people recommend I get a 36 or 38 c-c bar? I don't race or go that fast to be honest, I am more of a long distance tourer, so go for comfort more than aero. I noticed some sites say add 2cm some say use the measurement as it is.
Cheers,
Just had my "bony protrusions" on my shoulders measured which were surprisingly narrow at 35.5cm. We measured it three times, relaxed position, hands by my sides.
Would people recommend I get a 36 or 38 c-c bar? I don't race or go that fast to be honest, I am more of a long distance tourer, so go for comfort more than aero. I noticed some sites say add 2cm some say use the measurement as it is.
Cheers,
0
Comments
-
How tall are you, and what size is your bike ?0
-
5'10 (177cm) its a 58.0
-
-
ugo.santalucia wrote:hububalli wrote:5'10 (177cm) its a 58.
Too big
Been fitted to this size as my ideal size would be a custom frame apparently. I have really long arms and legs with a short torso. 56 frames are too short in the legs so the seat post is really high making the bars really low. Or I have a 58 that fits my legs perfectly but I have to use very short stems as the top tube is too long. 58s work fine for me with this method.
I am also not into the idea of fitting on the smallest possible frame you can fit on. I like my comfort.
0 -
Crikey, I'm 6' 2" and ride a 58 with a 120cm stem, just shows how different people can be. As a contrast, my wife is 5'6" and rides with a 33cm set of 3T Scattos on the track.Eddy Merckx EMX-3
Dolan L'Etape
Cougar Zero Uno
Genesis Core 50
Planet X TOR0 -
yeah it does really show there are no guaranteed magic rules to bike sizing. I went through so much pain before getting fitted and learning that I was all arms and legs. I have a positive ape index apparently which made me laugh.
I have a 60mm stem on with short reach bars and that works really well. The guy said if I had a custom frame I could have a longer stem which would improve steering at speed, but I only notice it if I am really going for it. On a 56 even with the stem flipped the saddle to handle bar drop was massive.0 -
I am also not into the idea of fitting on the smallest possible frame you can fit on. I like my comfort.
But its clearly not workng. Bar width isn't going to cause that kind of pain. The shoulder pain you describe is a classic sign that your frame is too big.
a 60mm stem on a 58cm is just plain wrong. Do you tend to do wheelies alot whilst climbing ? When you descend is the front end twitchy ?
Unless your a freak of nature i doubt you're arms and legs differ that much from the rest of us.
You need to size down a frame size or two.
Fit a seatpost with a longer setback
Fit a longer stem - should be 100-130mm ideally
Fit more spacers under the stem
What frame is it ? Geometrys can differ alot between manufacturers
Your body weight is distributed too far towards the rear wheel and your body (and shoulders) are supporting most of your weight whilst your arms are reaching further than they should need to. If you distributed that weight more equally and let your arms support you more. Your shoulder muscles will not have to work so hard.0 -
forget it, All I had was a simple question about what bar width would be best suited to someone with 35.5cm shoulders. Do I get the 36 or add the extra 2cm and get the 38.
You may not agree with what I ride but it is the results of years of trial and error, with various seat posts, set backs, stem heights, stem lengths, spacers and risers, which lead to a pro fitting, which gave me years of pain free riding over several bikes, all 58's. My latest bike is setup exactly the same as my old ones, down to the mm, apart from the handlebar width as I didn't record what that was on my old bike, but it does feel a bit wider.
The guy told me that for my height my arms and legs are very long, which is why I was having problems. He told me to get a 58, he set it up, now I ride pain free. My previous bikes have been nice to ride and are not twitchy or unbalanced at all.
So many people have told me that I should be on a 54,56 but they just don't fit! sorry!
Just looked up my inseam from my fit and it says 89cm, so yeah, they are long. A bike chart tells you an inseam that length is easily a 58.
I did actually get a 56 to fit once with a stem height extension but it looked ridiculous with my arse and bars so high up in the air.
I hope to one day to get the money together to buy the frame to fitter specified for me but its a bit expensive for the time being!
I edited my original post, to avoid the confusion.0 -
If you dont like the advice there's no need to get tetchy. You can simply ignore us
Narrower bars are not usually the go to choice for more comfort. Infact its the opposite. You''ll only be restricting your upperbody more.0 -
I prefer narrower and think it's worth getting used to them - but it's a matter of personal preference; I'd try 38 if I were you.0
-
trailflow wrote:If you dont like the advice there's no need to get tetchy. You can simply ignore us
Narrower bars are not usually the go to choice for more comfort. Infact its the opposite. You''ll only be restricting your upperbody more.
haha yeah I know, I appreciate people taking the time to respond. Its quite a repeating pattern in real life, I ask one thing and people go on about how I should be on a 54/56 etc etc I understand why they make that assumption, and they would be right if i wasn't such a weird shapeSimon Masterson wrote:I prefer narrower and think it's worth getting used to them - but it's a matter of personal preference; I'd try 38 if I were you.
I was thinking the 38 too. I cut a bit of wood at 38 and I think that felt about the same as my old bar. Not very scientific i know! My mate said bringing your arms in would release the pressure on my rhomboids which appears to be why I am feeling uncomfortable with my new bikes wider bars at 42 c-c0 -
Shoulder width is only a starting point. The correct size is the one that fits.0
-
Agreed - shoulder width is a poor guide to bar width - just ask a track rider..0
-
Why don't you just buy a set of £11.50 Bars from Wiggle (or borrow a set) and try them for a couple of rides?
If the width fits, then get some nicer ones to suit your needs.
FWIW I use 40cm with 39cm "bony protrusions"Condor Super Acciaio, Record, Deda, Pacentis.
Curtis 853 Handbuilt MTB, XTR, DT Swiss and lots of Hope.
Genesis Datum Gravel Bike, Pacentis (again).
Genesis Equilibrium Disc, 105 & H-Plus-Son.
Mostly Steel.0 -
Answer - whatever feels comfortable. I'm 5' 8" and ride a "54" bike and prefer a wider bar, typically found on large sized bikes. I found it feels more stable, so I prefer it. There is no right or wrong answer here.WyndyMilla Massive Attack | Rourke 953 | Condor Italia 531 Pro | Boardman CX Pro | DT Swiss RR440 Tubeless Wheels
Find me on Strava0 -
Imposter wrote:Agreed - shoulder width is a poor guide to bar width - just ask a track rider..
This article advises if bars are too wide it causes shoulder blades to move inwards causing neck pain and tension in shoulders:
https://roadcyclinguk.com/gear/buyers-g ... ade.html/20 -
ForumNewbie wrote:Imposter wrote:Agreed - shoulder width is a poor guide to bar width - just ask a track rider..
I said it was a 'poor guide'. But anyway, I would have thought it was reasonably simple. If your current bars feel too wide, fit narrower bars - if your current bars feel too narrow, fit wider bars.0 -
Imposter wrote:ForumNewbie wrote:Imposter wrote:Agreed - shoulder width is a poor guide to bar width - just ask a track rider..
I said it was a 'poor guide'. But anyway, I would have thought it was reasonably simple. If your current bars feel too wide, fit narrower bars - if your current bars feel too narrow, fit wider bars.
Looking at the 105 shifters on the bike, it looks just about impossible to get the allen key in to get to the screw to get them off the bars0