Cinelli Zydeco Tiagra vs 105
gdcfc1
Posts: 125
Looking to pull the trigger on cx bike. Have eye on Cinelli Zydeco.
I can get the 105 with a discount 1950 or the Tiagra for around 1620.
Dont worry about the prices - these are Euros.
Question is, is the difference worth it to spend the extra? Takes me over intended spend but if the gap is big enough will see what I can do.
Looking at sizes, seems the M is 53.5 wherreas the L is 56. At 182 (well, I always say 6 feet - and 32/33 inside leg) I think I need to go L. Am good on M Canyon Ulitmate (with 105) but think I need a bit more stretch out with Crosser as will be more touring type use....
I can get the 105 with a discount 1950 or the Tiagra for around 1620.
Dont worry about the prices - these are Euros.
Question is, is the difference worth it to spend the extra? Takes me over intended spend but if the gap is big enough will see what I can do.
Looking at sizes, seems the M is 53.5 wherreas the L is 56. At 182 (well, I always say 6 feet - and 32/33 inside leg) I think I need to go L. Am good on M Canyon Ulitmate (with 105) but think I need a bit more stretch out with Crosser as will be more touring type use....
looking into the +1
0
Comments
-
Unless you are dead set on buying a Zydeco, there are far better buys out there. Euros or not, most cross bikes with 105 can be had for significantly less than that...0
-
Good point. Head should win (at least not lose badly!). More searching and reading to do ....looking into the +10
